Freedom of speech entails?

@Rysonia (310)
United States
May 30, 2010 10:39am CST
There are so many different ideas on what exactly Freedom of speech entails and so I decided why not ask my fellow MLers and see what all of you thought. Personally I believe Freedom of Speech covers the right to discuss your opinions, your government, etc. I do not believe it is the right to harass, threaten or force children to listen to offensive language. I think our Founding Fathers neglected something very important. They neglected to make a bill of responsibilities to go along with that bill of rights. Honestly I think what the Constitution shows us far more then anything else is the naivety of the Founding Fathers.
1 person likes this
7 responses
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
30 May 10
You've already received a civics lesson so let me just say this. There are some limitations to the Freedom of Speech that Americans enjoy and clearly you are not aware of that. Harassment and making threats are areas that are covered by law and you can be charged. As far as forcing children to listen to offensive language, that's pretty broad. There is a ratings system in place that prohibits children from watching certain movies in a theatre or buying certain music but, what one chooses to do in their own home is their business unless it crosses the line to abuse which, again, is covered under the law. I would also like to add that it's our Constitution which allows you to express views that most Americans find extremely objectionable.
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
1 Jun 10
The idea that the freedoms that are guaranteed to us should have limitations because someone doesn't particularly like them is objectionable to many Americans.
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
31 May 10
I'm lost spalladino, that last line. What do you mean, what are your refering to, what is objectionable?
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
7 Jun 10
I agree. And that is why I object so vehemently the Obama administration. I also, since joining in here have come to object to just about every politician and political party as well as the current administration. I've learned alot here spalladino...and you have something to do with that. Thank you.
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
31 May 10
I like that idea, a Bill of Responsibilities. Great Idea! I think the founding fathers neglected to do this because 99.9% of the people involved in founding our country were alread RESPONSIBLE. There was no need to spell it out. The church taught responsibility, the schools taught responsibility and most of all parents taught responsibility. The Bible was an actual source book for teaching ethics and morals and responsibility and accountability. EVERYONE knew about such things, even if a few chose not to heed the lessons, the majority of America didn't need it spelled out for them.
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
1 Jun 10
Most responsibilities are dealt with under our laws or in other ways. If you don't drive responsibly, you get a ticket. If you don't send your kids to school, don't mow your lawn for six months, don't pay your taxes, play music too loudly after a certain hour, don't show up for work there are penalties for those. If you speak or write lies about someone you can be sued for libel or slander. I just don't understand what a Bill of Responsibility would cover that isn't already covered.
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
7 Jun 10
I don't agree completely with you on this. Responsibility goes deeper than just obeying the laws or suffering the consequences. There are many problems we have as a society that are ethical and moral, not necessarily illegal goings on.
@laglen (19759)
• United States
30 May 10
I believe that a good rule of thumb or use of common sense is, your rights end where mine begin. As long as you are not infringing on somebody elses rights, you are well with in your own. For instance, harassment is NOT ok. Regrading our Constitution and our Founding Fathers, I believe they got it right! The Constitution is meant for the Federal Government, their roles and responsibilities. Each individual should know better. That society is now creating idiots at a record pace does NOT reflect on them! Our cities and states should pick up where the Constitution leaves off. THAT is the whole point. I agree slavery was wrong and Thank Goodness we got that cleared up, otherwise, it should be left alone. Any other laws that need to be made should be up to the states and local governments! That society has failed is not the fault of our founding fathers.
@cupkitties (7421)
• United States
30 May 10
I think it entails just the things you said. Another thing you can add tot that list of nots is the internet. A lot of people especially Americans seem to have a problem understanding that their laws do not necessarily apply to a website. The laws of a website depends on what the creator wants to allow.
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
30 May 10
You're correct that the administrator (or owner) of a website can dictate the behavior of the users...mylot is an excellent example of that. I don't understand why you find it necessary to single out Americans though. I have come across some very obnoxious and hateful people from all over the world on various websites and they feel free to post as they see fit just as often as Americans do.
• United States
31 May 10
I'm talking about people speaking out about what their rights are not just posting however they see fit. Thats something I see done mostly by other Americans which is why I said especially Americans. I didn't say only Americans.
@marguicha (215876)
• Chile
30 May 10
Hi friend, I am not an american citizen, so I will not comment your Constitution. But every product of humanity must be put in its context. Your constitution was made two hundred years ago. Don´t blame their naivety on them, blame it in those that live now and and haven´t changed it according to the change of the world. Two centuries ago, the relation between parents and children were a lot different. Only 50 years ago, you could not see a movie or a TV show with a foul word it it. Now, it seems noone can make a sentence without including at least once the word f*** I´m not being a prude, I´m just stating a fact. Things change, society changes and we MUST try to do it to have a better world. Freedom of speech includes (for me) the capacity to remain silent when I feel I should not talk (as, for instance, I´m not saying what I think of your Constitution). Take care!
@Rysonia (310)
• United States
30 May 10
How is the naivety and refusal to face reality of men 200 years ago the fault of current law makers? While I admit that the law makers of today in the US are not perfect I have a hard time justifying blaming them for things that should have been done correctly 200 years ago and are pretty near impossible to fix now. The men who wrote the US constitution were barbaric on a good day, but still they were naive in thinking that those who thought like they did would always be in power and they neglected to protect people in the Constitution. Nothing occurring today wasn't occurring then, in fact there is probably less occurring now then there was then.
@evepin (721)
• Philippines
31 May 10
i agree with you. freedom of speech entails accountability and responsibility as well, not just spewing out whatever comes to mind. sometimes this freedom is abused, resulting in either hurting people or damning and destroying a person's life.
@urbandekay (18278)
30 May 10
Well said, we hear a lot about rights not much about responsibilities all the best urban