(Mostly for Women) Would You Take Your Husband's Name Even If Its Horrible?

United States
July 24, 2010 10:51pm CST
Let's say you are about to marry the man of your dreams- he is the man you can definitely visualize spending the rest of your life with. However, he has an unusual/unpronounceable/embarrassing last name. It could be something like Cockman or Pflufferhagazen or Lipshitz. Would you stand by your man and his name and take his family name as your own or would you keep your own? What's the most unusual/crazy last name you've ever heard of?
2 people like this
12 responses
@sender621 (14894)
• United States
25 Jul 10
Unfortunately, we don't choose the name of the man we marry. We have to love the man for who he is, not how much we like or dislike his name. My husband had an unusual last name. I spent more time correcting people on how to say it than anything else. Still, I wouldn't trade the man for a better sounding name.
• United States
26 Jul 10
But, not choosing the name isn't the same as not choosing the man. Keeping your own name doesn't mean you haven't chosen the man or committed to him. If choosing someone or being committed requires taking the person's name, then every married couple should use both the wife and husband's last names together. I don't have a problem with a woman taking her husband's name (or a man taking his wife's, for that matter - no one ever questions a guy's love or willingness to "stand by his woman" if he keeps his name.) I just have issues with the idea that a woman who chooses to keep her own name is somehow wrong.
• United States
26 Jul 10
I think - in my country at least- there is a growing trend of society being okay with women who keep their last names. I know several women who have done this for numerous reasons (career, costs, or just did not want to change). It should be up to the couple themselves what they want to do.
• United States
25 Jul 10
That is very true. We choose the man not his last name.
@marguicha (216424)
• Chile
25 Jul 10
I did never used my husband´s last name, except to give my last name for the dry cleaners because my own last names is one of those you have to spell to people. But I thought that if I had been XXX for the first 18 years of my like, there was no point in changing it when married. When I tell my grandchildren about our family name, I talk about my husban´s and my family namr put together. Fair enough. I have never thought that there are last names more beautiful or more ugly
@marguicha (216424)
• Chile
25 Jul 10
Using my husband´s last name was realistic. Hr had a common name here so everyone could spell it right. Mine, on the oher hand, is one of those last names that are extremelly difficult to write here, in my country. I my country, most woman of my generation added their husbands last name when they got married. But it was worse than that. The use was to put "de" before their husband´s last name, meaning they belonged to their husbands. I told my husband when I got married that I´d willingly place the "de" and his last name if he did the same with mine. I think he did not even understand what I was talking about. But he did not mind my not using his last name. We belonged to each other in our hearts.
• United States
25 Jul 10
To the dry cleaners? lol. That's funny. Many women nowadays are following that trend though, sticking to the name they were given at birth- especially if they have a career.
• United States
26 Jul 10
That is so sweet :)
@salonga (27775)
• Philippines
26 Jul 10
I have not encountered such kind of horrible names yet. I believe nobody would want to have such kind of name unless he is weird. I believe the last name was chosen by our forefathers so unless they are weird and stupid they will not use stupid names like that. Anyway if they did, the law has a way of giving us the chance to have it changed. Now if it so happened that the man I love happened to have such horrible name, then I will marry him just the same but I will not assume his last name yet, instead I will first have that horrible name changed by legal means.
• United States
26 Jul 10
lol, trust me there are names like that. In fact there is a guy whose last name is Assman. I don't know how his family came about with that name, but its his to keep or change.
@ron2dmax (48)
• Philippines
25 Jul 10
oh my gosh..ahahaha...i never expected that you would ask this here in mylot...i mean, we have the same question, actually i had asked myself the same and thought its awkward to change my lastname into my man so choosing a man with a good name would be better---sounds rich, sophisticated, famous, etc. even if he doesn't belong to any of those..hmmm funny..oh well, should say my "karma" came...until i've learned to love with a man who has the most embarrassing lastname i could ever describe in my entire life (never to mention), what would i do so accept it...it happened so take it ;)
• United States
25 Jul 10
lol, I actually came up with this question because my current boyfriend. We've been talking about marriage recently and though I've always known his last name, it wasn't until recently I realized I could be taking his name. Lets just say his last name is very similar to one of the ones I used. lol.
@katiesueg (257)
• Italy
25 Jul 10
I got married in Italy, and here women do not take their husband's last name. The name you were born with remains your legal name all of your life, really much simpler for legal documents like driving licences, etc. I would have been happy to take my husbands last name, I like it better than my own, but I was not given that option.
• United States
26 Jul 10
I didn't know that. That's interesting. I wonder if other countries around Italy don't give you that option.
@spazz435 (322)
• United States
25 Jul 10
I think I would have to take his name because any man I get married to will most likely sound weird with my name. My name is Mystery. The last name that I have now sounds okay because I've lived with it ever since I was born of course. But I think that any woman should take her man's last name because why would you let a last name give you doubts about wanting to acquire it. It's not like he had a choice. If anything the man has it worse because he was born with the last name. So he had no choice. You do, and you should take it.
• United States
25 Jul 10
Wow your first name is Mystery? Very cool. Mine is Quinntessa. It means Queen of the Summer Harvest. lol. Your name is very unique too that is awesome and you should be proud. My sisters name is literally made up from parts of my name, my mum's name, my grandpa's name,and my brother's name. My mum made it up. And my da made mine up. My brother has a normal name lol.
• United States
25 Jul 10
Mystery and Quinntessa. Nice. Both of you have some really cool names, though. :)
@Angelwriter (1954)
• United States
25 Jul 10
No, if it was horrible, I wouldn't take it. My own name is bad enough (not embarrassing, just gets misspelled and mispronounced all the time) so if I was going to change it, I'd want to trade up. And, if he were the man of my dreams, he wouldn't be bothered by me keeping my own name.
• United States
25 Jul 10
Me and my boyfriend have discussed marriage so I really think he is the one and he feels the same. He is Italian and his great grandfather came with his family from Italy with the last name Conatelli. Well his grandfather wanted to get his family off to a more "American" start and changed their name to Conn. Now Conn is not a bad name on its own (it is actually more gaelic and I am half Irish). Anyway, unfortunately my boyfriend is in prison for robbing some banks. So he is a convict. Or a con. So for me its a little weird having a boyfriend who is a con with the last name Conn. That is not THAT horrible, I know but its a little ironic. He has contemplated getting his last name changed back to his great grandfather's last name Conatelli, but he will probably just keep Conn. I know there are people with really embarrassing last names. My last name is the same as a famous beauty company lol. No relation though. And yes, I would/will still take my man's last name Conn.
• United States
25 Jul 10
Wow. That is ironic. A boyfriend who is a con whose name is Conn. That is extremely ironic. It actually reminds me of what my friend told me, she knew a cop whose last name is Pigg so they call him Officer Pigg. lol.
@madteaparty (2748)
• Japan
25 Jul 10
Omg, Cockman Well, in my country, even if many people here are not aware of it -seriously, I have seen all kinds of surprised faces from people born here when they heard that-, changing your surname for your husband's one is not mandatory, and I would never change it, as it's not my name and I'm not going to lose mine and my identity just because of getting married. I have heard many funny names, but just in the native nanguage, so it might not be funny in English, sorry
• United States
25 Jul 10
You brought up a good point: Its kind of cool how names change references/meanings when you translate it into another language.
@puccagirl (7294)
• Israel
25 Jul 10
Yes, I would. I think it is a sign and commitment, and it is important to me. I think I would be a bit bummed out, but I would still do it in the end. I am old-fashioned that way!
• United States
25 Jul 10
Nothing wrong with being "old-fashioned." lol. I think many will agree with you that it is a sign of commitment.
@incus99 (1083)
• Philippines
25 Jul 10
I think the last name doesn't really count in a relationship as long as you love each other.
• United States
25 Jul 10
Well thank you for responding. Happy mylotting.
@keshia2007r (2880)
• United States
25 Jul 10
I would take the last name. Even if its something crazy. I think you get respected more for taking the man last name and not to hyphen yours. you know? At least in my church its definitely like that. But the last name don't determine the means of the relationship. at least it shouldn't. But this is all my opinion. do what's best for you. (if this is you in this situation...im not sure..or just a general question) Happy Mylotting Peace and Love!!