will k+12 really produce quality graduates?

Philippines
May 25, 2011 10:45pm CST
There will be changes in the country's educational system in terms of the number of years. Before, our children attend preparatory school, then they will spend 6 or 7 years in grade school, and 4 more years in high school and they will be off to college. But some parents don't send their children to preparatory school. Needless to say, public schools don't offer grade 7. So after sixth grade, they're off to high school. Therefore, the total number of years our children normally spend in a school are 10, excluding college years. This time, kindergarten ( K1 and K2 ) is already mandatory. It is no longer an option. Though public schools still don't offer grade 7, they deemed it better to just add 2 more years to the 4 years of high school. 2 years in prep school, 6 years in elementary and another 6 years in high school, thus the name K+12. This comes with the hope to produce quality graduates and later on become productive citizens. I think the intentions are very noble. And I guess, it's about time. Almost all countries worldwide require a longer number of years to be spent in schools. So if want don't want to be left behind, we might as well make some changes. However, I don't think this will guarantee good quality of graduates. Why? Do you know that in our school, there are 65 to 70 students in a class? That in a year level, there are 20 sections? Other schools have more. Does it matter? It wouldn't matter if all of these students are cooperative, willing to learn, disciplined and equipped with basic knowledge. However, we only get this kind of students in the first two sections. The rest are a mixture of not so ideal students. Let's put it this way, you enter a room full of 65 noisy and unruly students. You have 80 minutes (science time) to spend in that class. You'll spend the first few minutes checking the attendance ( this is a must because they tend to cut classes and they are your responsibility that whenever something happened to them you will be held accountable ). You can't also let another student to check the attendance for you because some gets bullied and hated by their classmates. Another few minutes in checking the assignment then proceed to your lesson for the day. This is where the problem comes in. How will you teach your students scientific concepts when they neither understand nor speak English? If they cannot understand English, how can you ask them to make or do some observations? Much more make conclusions? We are required to teach the subject in English but if this is the case, how will you let the day pass? Translate? Yes. This slows down the learning process. The topic which you are suppose to teach in just one day will take 2 days to finish. In a quarter, half of the topics will not be introduced and this is not possible because the quarter exam is centralized and if you were not able to discuss the assigned topics for that grading period your students will most likely fail in the exam which will affect their grades. What to do? Most teachers proceed with their lesson regardless of whether the students learned the lesson or not. Where is quality there? Can you blame the teachers? Aside from poor comprehension, another problem is the inability to read. High school students but don't know how to read. Another problem? Inability to perform math operations. We, as high school teachers are not suppose to teach these basic skills anymore. Why are we getting this kind of students? How did these students graduate from grade school not learning how to read and do math? Here's how. I have a co teacher who handles the physics subject of the graduating class in high school. That school year 4 students in her class failed and definitely will not be able to graduate. She was summoned by the division supervisor and was told to take pity to the family and allow the students to graduate because times are hard and that she will ruin the lives of the students if she decides to fail them for good. But she stood her ground. Later when she passed the full scholarship program sponsored by Tan Yan Kee Foundation, her permit was not approved. She lost a big opportunity because she did what should be done. That is the main reason why we cannot produce good quality of graduates, mostly in public schools. I hope to make a difference but its so hard.
4 responses
@xtedaxcvg (3189)
• Philippines
30 May 11
I think you are attacking a different type of problem in our education system. The K+12 system affects all schools in the Philippines, not just public schools. If public school teachers-to-students ratio is not very ideal then it should be dealt with differently. The fact that almost all countries adhere to this standard is already enough to give this one a "go" signal. I for one support this and I hope this gets implemented before my baby starts school.
• United States
26 May 11
That's a tough position to be in as a teacher. We have a lot of the same problems here in the United States. I'm not saying that there are not good schools, but there are plenty of failing ones. A problem with the educational system is that they are now more concerned about training kids to on how to take a test, rather than how to learn the material. Schools are more concerned about their ratings than the student's education. There's competition between the schools. Graduation rates are important, but not for the right reasons. There are too many students who don't know how to read and do math at a decent level. Because classes are overcrowded, the students don't get the individualized attention and push that they need. They are able to hide the fact that they don't understand the material easier. Some schools don't have the best funding, and others have very good funding, and sometimes this is a result of the socioeconomic status of the students that go there. This leads to inequality in the quality of the education. It's sad that all of this is happening, and in many different countries. I think that the focus needs to be on the students and their education, not on schools and their ratings. Getting left back is looked at as embarrassing, but is it not embarrassing that someone could pass school not knowing basic things that they should know like reading? Is that not the whole point of going to school-to have those basic stepping stones to higher education and a better life? It's not helping the student to pass them to spare them embarrassment, because that child will go on to have a harder life and less opportunities available to them. It's is very sad what happened to your co-teacher. She was trying to do what is best for the child, she was being a good teacher and was punished for it. This is not how the system should work. This is why the educational system is failing so many kids. I think another thing that is very important, which isn't taught in public school, is communication skills/public speaking. I was able to hide throughout my years due to shyness. Now, as a college graduate, it's very difficult for me to communicate with people since I get very nervous. It's not that I don't have the education, but the habit of hiding followed me through college. That can make people lose out on a lot of opportunities. I know it's up to the person to be determined to change, especially if they see what they are doing wrong, but old habits die hard. It seems like you are an amazing teacher, and I hope that you are successful in touching and improving as many lives as possible. Teachers are so underrated and underpaid, even though they have probably the most important job a person can have, shaping the citizens of our future.
• Philippines
26 May 11
First, let me advise you on your structure of discussion. Frankly, you put everything in one go. I won't help your future responders in taking in a lot of text without break or partitions. I tried to read your full discussion but I have been lost in more than three times. Second, this seems to be more of a rant, rather than a discussion, revolving the educational system. I could imagine how you would deliver this in oral form. If you wish to discuss the topic, it's fine but please select and spare some details that you wish to impart. It's too much. Basically, you ask a question and you answer the question itself. What is there to discuss in the first place? Third, to answer your main question. Only time will tell. The policy had been barely been enforced. Though your question is valid, there's no point in predicting something that is happening now. Hope for the future. That's what keep human going.
• Philippines
26 May 11
I'm from Philippines, and I finished elementary in a public school...at my time there were still 40:1 ratio but now numbers are escalating, and even if the teachers right now are really trying to make a difference they sometimes get jaded in time too, like how your co-teacher was treated, they realize that the people above are not all that concern about the learning of the children but of themselves and their image, this is not true in all accounts though, but you've got to agree that it rings true...not only is the student-teacher ratio the problem, it's also lack of books, materials and really dilapidated buildings that make the students feel unmotivated... To be honest, I learned Reading and Writing when I was in elementary, Arithmetic was hard to learn when the teachers are too busy with students they see as slow learners, and since I was doing good in the two areas they just assumed I got by in Math which was not true, it was also my fault more than my teachers for not telling them though, but if happened to me it can happen to some students too, and if there are way too many students in the room learning might not really take place... English as the medium of instruction I think was made because not everyone are familiar with Filipino, and we all have our dialects...but yes, it also does present a problem... This program will produce better graduates in private schools/in public science schools, but I doubt that if no change will be done to the teaching system of the public schools then the graduates will still be the same old, same old graduates...