UDRS not mandatory says ICC.is it a victory for BCCI?

Tweet

hi friends.somewhere before june this year,there was a rule that the teams playing can choose whether they want UDRS or not. since BCCI has been against it ever since the infamous 20-1 ratio during the india-srilanka series,they used this rule to make sure UDRS was not included in matches whenever india plays. after some sort of tug of war ,after many accused BCCI of using muscle power (or PAWAR ) and making ICC rule infavour of BCCI, ICC finally decided to make UDRS mandatory in al form of cricket irrespective of how the teams feels. this decision is ofcourse taken after a lengthy talk with BCCI who wanted hawk eye out. lady luck might have deserted the indian captain but not indian cricket board. ever since UDRS is made mandatory,its pretty much behaved like newly turned 18 year olds i.e. missing the obvious while enjoying freedom. hawkeye failed to track the ball accurately mnot even approximately. the ever reliable hot spot was rendered useless by vasselin. snicko can only be used in india when india is not playing ( no crowd noise ). finaly ICC must have realised its mistake and said UDRS is still in its initial stages and further improvement are necessary.so its not mandatory anymore. which almost sounded like a speech prepared by Mr.Srinivasan. to sum it up,every other nation will use UDRS as long as their opposition is not india a.k.a. BCCI