What do you think about the overabundance of advertising in media?!

@maezee (41997)
United States
January 25, 2013 5:12pm CST
I am just writing up a discussion on this for next week in my Intro to Mass Communications class that I am taking this semester. For one, it's a VERY interesting class - I would suggest it to anyone! I would really appreciate your input and discussion points to help me out with forming my discussion and arguments. It's a fact that (at least in the U.S., according to my professor), we passively digest anywhere between 3,000 and 6,000 advertisements per day. Sound like a lot? That's because it IS! Thinking in terms of internet, television, billboards, radio, etc - and considering the amount of time we all spend on various forms of media per day -- this is shockingly realistic. I also read that in 1994, an "hour long" program actually had about 50 hours of actual content, 10 minutes of that program would be allotted for advertising. Now, the "hour long" program has been reduced to between 42-43 minutes. That means almost a THIRD (33%) of what we watch is commercials. Not only that, but there is product placement in a lot of TV shows (I was watching a show called Pretty Little Liars the other day -- and there were TWO in ONE EPISODE!!!). How does this "impact" you? That is the question that is ultimately getting answered here. How does this impact you and the people around you? Does this make you spend more money on the things being advertised? How often do you actually buy something you see an advertisement for? Or do all of these ads just get you annoyed? What do you *do* during commercial breaks or while commercials come on the radio? Does the overabundance of ads annoy you? How do they affect you? I know this seems like twenty questions, but I would really like to hear your answers and discuss this! Do you think it's inevitable that media companies do this? To meet their "bottom line", as it were? I think for me, it causes me to stream online or stream Netflix rather than watch TV shows. I also listen to mix CDs in my car and sometimes while at work to avoid the seemingly millions of commercial breaks...What do you do?
1 person likes this
4 responses
@mariaperalta (19073)
• Mexico
25 Jan 13
I understand it.. they have to pay alot of people to make a tv program. You have office staffs, make up, costumes, props. Im sure even a 1/2 hour show takes alot of people to put it on. And look what actors make these days.
@maezee (41997)
• United States
26 Jan 13
More than that, though, is that these companies turn a rather large profit....
• Philippines
26 Jan 13
Hello Maezee, too much I say, way too much and way too many. But of course, it's one of the best ways to show what ever products or services that you are trying to promote to the public and media tv is the biggest to reach the masses. it's sad that even cable channels have now been penetrated by commercials. maybe they need a lot of money and commercials are one other income to keep the station running
@maezee (41997)
• United States
26 Jan 13
Or maybe they are turning a BIGGER profit?! I wonder at what point the commercials are necessary make them "break even" and what their profit line is?
@Adoniah (7513)
• United States
25 Jan 13
I recorded a show over the holidays and when I finally got around to watching it I counted the commercials at one point...There were 22 of them...There was at least 3 minutes of commercials to 6 minutes of the show...Even when you fast forward thru them, it still takes a while. Commercials do not induce me to buy their products...Most of the insult the intelligence. I have to admit that there are a couple of funny ones, but they are few and far between. My computer is too old to stream video and my tv is also too old to hook a DVD play up to...
@burrito88 (2774)
• United States
26 Jan 13
If you stream shows on Netflix using a Roku you will see many shows are only 44 minutes long to account for the commercials. Product placement in movies or TV has been going on for some time. I remember seeing a Burger King Store in the movie Gremlins. For ET, the novelization of the story had Eliot leading ET home with a trail of M & M's. M & M's wouldn't pay so the movie switched to Reese's pieces. One of the strangest product placements i ever saw was in John Carpenter's original movie The Thing. There's a scene where they use a flame thrower to kill part of the alien that is imitating one of the crew and the head falls off the body, sprouts legs and starts heading into another room. In that room are drums labeled "Rhoplex". This would mean nothing to a normal person but having worked for Rohm and Haas, I was struck by the insertion. Rhoplex is an additive to paint formulations. Why would there be drums of Rohplex in the Antarctic except for use as a commercial?
@maezee (41997)
• United States
26 Jan 13
That is really weird. I mean, most of us wouldn't watch that movie and then think: YES! I need an additive to paint formulations!!!! Maybe it was an accident that that was included? That doesn't really seem like a product even worth "placing" to the average viewer/consumer... Ha ha, good example though!