In case of a melt down, are nieghbors with out nuclear power plant safe ? .

Philippines
February 8, 2013 1:59am CST
Some countries don't want nuclear power plant for safety reason. In case of disaster example " melt down, is the neighboring countries like the Philippines is much safer to live as compared to their neighboring nation with nuclear power plant ? Japan, Malaysia, India. China, Indonesia are maintaining nuclear power plant. Their neighboring nation like the Philippines don't want a nuclear power plant for allegedly it is not safe for their people. Is the Philippines safe of any nuclear warhead ? in case a nuclear disaster will occur on their neighboring countries?
7 people like this
14 responses
@MoonGypsy (4606)
• United States
8 Feb 13
i really think you are right and make a very good point. your country may be safe from nuclear war if neighboring countries ever fell under attack. i heard that a nuclear war really doesn't destroy everything like people think. there will still be parts of the world unharmed. hiroshima proved that. you are very lucky. we live in the united states and it's full of that kind of stuff over here. if we had a nuclear attack, our goose would be cooked, and we have warheads.
3 people like this
@sweety_81 (2124)
• India
11 Feb 13
I have even read that the total accumulated nuclear weapons on Earth, if used, could destroy earth many times. A horrifying thought! And then, there have been movies and fiction about Nuclear winter too. Check this: " A regional exchange of relatively small nuclear weapons could plunge the world into a decade-long "nuclear winter", destroying agriculture and killing millions, according to a new study. Weapons experts to consider that small-scale nuclear exchanges are now more likely than the massive US-Soviet exchanges feared during the Cold War. In the 1980s, scientists calculated that such exchanges would put enough smoke into the atmosphere to shade the Earth from the Sun, causing a nuclear winter. Now scientists have re-calculated the likelihood of nuclear winter using modern, vastly improved climate models and a more likely modern scenario for small-scale nuclear war. ................ By contrast, a regional exchange where adversaries target each others' megacities would ignite huge urban firestorms. Toon calculates the smoke released per kilotonne of explosive yield would be 100 times greater than in the Cold War scenarios. Moreover, it lasts longer. The 1980s models, says Toon, did not extend into the upper atmosphere far enough, and could not be run long enough to discover this. " More on : http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn11287-nuclear-winter-may-kill-more-than-a-nuclear-war.html
• Philippines
8 Feb 13
I followed reading the history of America ever since my Elementary to High School, College and until to date I might be more knowledgeable in your History as compared to some true Americans I love History although it was not the course I finished in College. From the time your ancestors departed from England, George Washington, war between North and South, the creation of one United people now USA. wow !!! how amazing you've nothing to be afraid, your nation is really matured in handling crisis far from expectation. Your foundation as a nation and as a people was very strong. The buying of the State Louisiana for an amount of $ 25,000 from England was already a projection for a Centuries to come. Nuclear warfare is just a simple thing for your country to handle. I hope someday people may realize the usefulness of Atomic Energy and people may become expert in handling such a huge powerful Energy. For me it is better to study carefully this kind of Energy source than to extract oil from the ground. Feel secured your country is a century ahead in technology. What is exposed is far from what is hidden. Support the caused of your country whatever it will be and be proud.
2 people like this
@vernaC (1491)
• Romania
8 Feb 13
May not be directly but contamination spreads fast through air so somehow we have no escape. Perhaps the only advantage is we have more time to prepare or wear a mask unlike the countries who have nuclear plants but then again, we don't have masks or preparation in case of nuclear meltdown or nuclear wars like the other countries so it seems like it's all fair, die at the same time.
3 people like this
@sweety_81 (2124)
• India
8 Feb 13
Yes, nuclear radiation can spread pretty dangerously, and its effects could be devastating.
• Philippines
8 Feb 13
Yes, you will have more time to prepare but the issue is, you we are still affected and your preparation is far behind with those with nuclear power plant. For as I knew nation with nuclear power plant, include on their educational curriculum, things to do in case of nuclear mishap. Their people are more knowledgeable about nuclear warhead.
2 people like this
@agmamayo (804)
• Philippines
8 Feb 13
In case of a melt down like what happened in Fukushima Japan where nuclear leakage occurred, the possibility of the Philippines to be affected by nuclear particles is readily reduced by the distance of the site to that of the Philippines. Unless the wind direction is directed towards the Philippines then in some cases, small amounts of radioactive particles may drop in the country. However, in the case of a nuclear war, for example if the United States and China confronts each other with nuclear arms, then there is a great risk for the Philippines to be included into this war because we all know that the Philippines and the United States of America are long term allies, so the risk of China attacking our country is high. Atomic or nuclear debris may reach our country from China, likewise China might use a nuclear warhead in attacking the Philippines if ever World War 3 between China and United States occur.
@sweety_81 (2124)
• India
8 Feb 13
An armed Nuclear conflict raises the possibility of massive destruction manifold, and it is something that needs to be avoided.
1 person likes this
• Philippines
8 Feb 13
Good, what a nice explanation. If what you said is true then the Philippines is not safe in case of nuclear war nor even in case wherein there will be a disaster of nuclear plant on their neighboring countries. So the Philippines will be a setting duck in case of nuclear mishap. What a pity, a peace loving country with many intellectual individuals but yet did nothing to help prepare their country in event of disaster.
2 people like this
@sjlskl (3382)
• Singapore
8 Feb 13
While Philippines is some distance from countries like say Japan, but it there is a nuclear meltdown like the recent near meltdown at Fukishima, the pacific ocean could be contaminated. So there will be no escaping in such event. As for nuclear warfare, the world will be in deep trouble when it happen.
3 people like this
• Philippines
8 Feb 13
Yeah of course what a nice analysis, but problem is these nuclear plant contributed a lot in saving fuels and also did reduced the carbon dioxide emission to the air. It replaces a thousand tons of gas fuel extracted from the earth crush. For now we don't knew how deep is the gas mining in Arabic country. Leaving our mother into a hollow shell.
2 people like this
@Mashnn (4501)
8 Feb 13
I do not think any country it safe when it comes to nuclear power. If anything happens, I guess all countries will suffer and even it can be worse for countries without nuclear power.
3 people like this
• Philippines
8 Feb 13
So if country without nuclear plant will develop one for them it will be of their advantage. To own or not to own, they are still affected and yet they refrain from having a nuclear power plant. If we will based our assessment to the countries without nuclear power plant on this argument, then what we can say to those without nuclear plant as a country with people who refused development and don't know how to grab opportunities.
2 people like this
@else22 (4317)
• India
8 Feb 13
No,Philipins is not safe.In the face of a meltdown the couintry would have to suffer.It is just like people who don't smoke suffering from passive smoking.Any country in the neighborhood of nuclear countries would have to have the brunt in the face of a nuclear catastrophy.I am from India,a country equipped with a vast nuclear arsenal and suffering from shortage of power.Having nuclear weapons is indispensable for us as we have neighbors like China and Pakistan.So far as Pakistan is concerned,their nuclear facilities are always at a risk of going in the hands of terrorists of the Taliban.And if a nuclear disaster takes place in our country,Pakistan and China too would have to bear the brunt.
3 people like this
• Philippines
8 Feb 13
Really, is it true, then why don't Philippine Government directly face the issue of nuclear power. Educate the people on the right way to react in case of nuclear disaster. Then make use of a nuclear power plant by developing one of its own for the benefit of the people than just waiting for any nuclear mishap in the future.
2 people like this
@else22 (4317)
• India
8 Feb 13
Our government has now established a nuclear power plant in Kudunkulam,a place in southern India.The people there have been educated by opposition parties and protesting against it.
2 people like this
@chiyosan (30184)
• Philippines
8 Feb 13
I do not think that Philippines (in this case as a sample) won't be safe completely. Yes we do not have nuclear power plants turned on, and we have sacrificed the lack of energy at times because we are not ready to have this power plant up and running. But nuclear power plants are huge, strong and in cases when there are meltdowns, perhaps if it happens that most would altogether melt down, then the nuclear wastes are probably going to be absorbed in the atmosphere. there should be around a few hundreds of kilometers that is not a safe zone, but it should still scare us, after all nuclear power is a scary technology.
1 person likes this
@urbandekay (18278)
8 Feb 13
No, Philippines is in danger from any country that has a nuclear accident that is windward of there. No country in the world is safe in the event of a nuclear war all the best, urban
2 people like this
• Philippines
8 Feb 13
Do you mean that this country without nuclear power plant is from the beginning and refusing to own one is unreasonable country for they refused to the benefits this nuclear power plant can offer to their country that may alleviate the living condition of their citizentry.
1 person likes this
@urbandekay (18278)
8 Feb 13
No, nothing I said could ever be interpreted to mean that all the best, urban
1 person likes this
@suspenseful (40193)
• Canada
8 Feb 13
It would not be unless the other countries take stringent precautions. In the case of a war where someone bombs the plant, it might not make any difference unless the nuclear material were underground. I would not build a nuclear power plant on a country that is a small island or a series of islands. With someplace like China, you could build the plant inland in a place with a limited population. But no mater what, not near a populated area. So the Philippines and any small country would not be safe. The only place to build a nuclear plant would be in a large country away from a populated area.
@pergammano (7682)
• Canada
8 Feb 13
When it comes to nuclear activity..we are all vulnerable! A case in point, I live on the West Coast of Canada, and our beaches are laden with Nuclear active debris...and I mean laden (it is costing us a fortune to clear our beaches as special apparel/containers are needed...and disposal is costly). This debris comes from the Nuclear Power plants in Japan that melted down after the earthquake! The debris is still arriving..and our beaches are NOT safe..and we are right around the globe from Japan!
• Canada
8 Feb 13
little late now...the horse is out of the barn! There are hundreds of Nuclear Plants around t he world...now we need to ramp up the technology in cases of melt downs like Chernoble! And I don't want to think of a Nuclear War!
1 person likes this
• Philippines
8 Feb 13
Your right we are all vulnerable, so why not just study thoroughly the caused and effect of Nuclear Energy than trying to do something to prevent others from using it.
2 people like this
@sweety_81 (2124)
• India
8 Feb 13
Well, there are two aspects to this thing: 1) If there is a nuclear weapons attack on a country's border area, other countries surrounding it would be severely affected by Nuclear radiation, and winds carrying such radiation. 2)If a power plant breaks down, neighboring countries still would have chances to evacuate, and take some safety measures, or call help from countries having better expertise in dealing with such disasters. Maintaining Nuclear Power Plants or weapons is no mean deal, and needs a lot of care and planning.
@sweety_81 (2124)
• India
8 Feb 13
An armed Nuclear conflict raises the possibility of massive destruction manifold, and it is something that needs to be avoided.
2 people like this
• Philippines
8 Feb 13
That's what 100 % percent true, So if I may, we might as well help work for peace and harmony to let them all feel how we love and care all living things specially humanities flight on Earth
1 person likes this
• Philippines
8 Feb 13
So if this country without nuclear power plant can develop one for them, their people could have more time and opportunities to learn more about nuclear warhead in the real scene of actual application, To date most of the people are still ignorant of what is the true effect of a nuclear power to mankind en toto it cause and effect.
2 people like this
@vandana7 (98952)
• India
8 Feb 13
We are a nuclear nation, and our parliament has approved installation of nuclear plants, though not a single of such plants has been commissioned as of date. Given that, I dont think any nation is safe with such things. Even if we and our neighbors would not have such power units, we still cant be sure if a madman takes over the reigns of country and starts the meltdown. So given such a scenario, nuclear power is not such a bad thing. I mean, at least, we get power, and live while we can.
1 person likes this
@WakeUpKitty (8694)
• Netherlands
8 Feb 13
Each time again I think: if there is a nuclear disaster, who cares about where to be safe? A disaster is what it is, a disaster. So in most cases the end of...
2 people like this
• Philippines
8 Feb 13
So then if you can't prevent it why not make use of the nuclear power plant to ease the burden of the people on country without nuclear power plant. Are this country really that poor ? that can't afford develop a nuclear power plant, specially if they have volcanoes on their country.
1 person likes this
@kokomo (1867)
• Philippines
9 Feb 13
I think it is not safe even if there is no nuclear power plant here in the Philippines if there are a lot of nuclear power plant of the countries around the country. China for example is just near Philippines and it will not still be safe .
1 person likes this
@sweety_81 (2124)
• India
11 Feb 13
In fact, close neighbors with nuclear weapons could also be threat, or if they face weapons threat themselves.