The so called "Undisputed Fact" - Evolution

Philippines
February 12, 2013 10:10am CST
Just in my observation, an atheist/evolutionist see a Bible believing person as ignorant, stupid, and/or wicked. In an article regarding the Creation-Evolution Controversy, it is stated there that evolution is an undisputed fact within the scientific community. All science books that I know now call this theory a fact. The question is, is this really science? We know science is something that we can test and demonstrate within a lab. Since evolution says that it took billions of years, that is not something testable. I don't know if there are any theistic evolutionists here but my position is that this earth was created in six literal days about 6000 years ago. 2 Peter 3 3 Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts, 4 And saying, Where is the promise of his coming? for since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation. 5 For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water. Why am I posting this? 1 Peter 3:15 But sanctify the Lord God in your hearts: and be ready always to give an answer to every man that asketh you a reason of the hope that is in you with meekness and fear. And also because I believe that this theory is dangerous.
2 people like this
6 responses
@dlr297 (5415)
• United States
12 Feb 13
Psalm 90:4 For a thousand years in thy sight are but as yesterday when it is past, and as a watch in the night. 2 Peter 3:8 But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day. It's saying that God is not controlled by time. God Created the Heaven and the Earth, and everything on it. You see when Evil takes over and tries to change the word of God. That is something that God warns us about.. When we will have to watch out for those that will try and deceive us. God said that it Happened...It happened....... Thats like the Bible talks about wonders that we will see as the end of the age gets closer..one of them would be that the water would turn red like blood. This is happening all over the world at different times this past year.. Science says it is happening because of the algae. God said that it would happen....He did not say to ignore it because the algae made it happen.....God said it would happen....It happened. But some scientist some where is trying to say that God did not make it happen. It is Science that is going to make the mark of the beast possible. Hold fast in your belief in God. Just because some Man said it is true does not make it True. Only Gods word is true........ Evil will use any means it can to try to turn you away from God. Do not let Science deceive you.
@iuliuxd (4453)
• Romania
12 Feb 13
No, it is not science`s fault, it is because the science is confiscated by atheists these days and everyone who talks about the flaws of naturalism is sent to Gulag. The science must serve the political interest and the politics must serve rich people`s interest. And they need workers not thinkers.
@dlr297 (5415)
• United States
12 Feb 13
God made the world perfect...and when evil enters into any situation. That is what distorts it...You are right it is the evil that is in the Scientist which makes the science evil. The only thing that needs to be served is the word of God. My interest is in Gods word....not science. And if you know anything about Gods word...The anti-christ will someday very soon be head of the one world government. so if science must serve the political interest.. It is not serving God...but the Anti-christ....and everything that is evil. Science is just the tool that Evil is using to try and deceive people.
• Philippines
13 Feb 13
First and foremost I would like to say that I'm not against science. dlr297, I think there's no Biblical reason that we should be against science, because science merely deals with facts. The fact is, evolution is not science because there's no scientific evidence to support it. On the other hand, there are scientific findings which support creation. Why are you blaming science? It's just like blaming the spoon and fork for making people fat.
@iuliuxd (4453)
• Romania
12 Feb 13
I know atheists see the christian this way but there is no reason to be ashamed. From my experience the atheists are more dumb than any religious person, they just take advantage of what is written on internet because they think this way the others will look at them as smart people.An internet atheist is great on copy/paste but he is unable to think. The theory is dangerous and it made tens of millions of victims but there is nothing we can do.You can read philosophy and logic books and talk with an atheist on the realm of philosophy and logic. You can`t talk with them about biology because none of you understands what`s going on there. There is a nice book written by an atheist philosopher named Thomas Nagel - Mind and Cosmos - why the materialist neo darwinian conception of nature is almost certainly false. Another good book i`ve read was Nihilism by Seraphim Rose.
• Philippines
13 Feb 13
Well, some atheists might be just doing some copy/paste methods in the Internet. The atheists I know were the ones who went and studied in different reputable universities. The question is, why can't they see the lie in this theory? The Bible says because they were are deluded (2 Thessalonians 2:11).
@iuliuxd (4453)
• Romania
13 Feb 13
When i talked about copy paste i was talking about accepting something as true without asking yourself any questions. The christians are also very good at it.
1 person likes this
• Philippines
13 Feb 13
Not all Christians you might mean.
@TwoEms (37)
• United States
8 Sep 15
Bible was written by men who were control freaks. Especially over women. Also, they wrote that God was perfect and all-loving. If that were true, why would God admit he made a mistake and murder all living things on the planet (except for one family)? Why would he express jealousy or rage or any other negative emotions that are depicted in the Bible? Why are there so many holes and unanswered questions in the Bible? If God was real, why couldn't he write the Bible himself? and why thousands of years ago? why not now in multiple languages that everyone can understand? It's all a crock and it is embarrassing that people still believe in it. They follow along like sheep. No questions asked. Very, very, dangerous...
• Philippines
8 Sep 15
You have a bigger problem than all of those things you asked. How do you stand before God on the Day of Judgment?
@TwoEms (37)
• United States
8 Sep 15
@silvercryst340v3 Every moment in our lives is judgment time. Haven't you ever heard of karma? Every one of our actions has consequences, some obvious, some not. We create our own destiny. We all are responsible for ourselves whether we like it or not. Our own causes make our own effects. It has nothing to do with some jealous, supernatural tyrant.
@salonga (27963)
• Philippines
13 Feb 13
Evolution undisputed fact? Hahaha! How could this theory be undisputed when it is totally false and unbelievable? How could a man evolve from ape? Well those who believe evolution then it is up to them to admit that their ancestors are ape. But me, mine are not apes, they are human beings and they are all good looking. Those who believe in evolution, maybe when they look at the mirror they see ape so they have good reason to believe they came from apes or their ancestors must be apes. Well indeed I agree with what you said. As for me, the Bible is the only authority that tells the truth. God is the Creator and the very reason for our existence. There are people who complicate things so they invented this evolution theor in their effort to discredit the Bible. But they will only fail. All things in the world will pass away but the Word will not.
• Philippines
13 Feb 13
They do not only believe they came from apes. They also believe that they came from a rock 4.6 billions years ago. When a frog kissed by true love turns into a prince, we call that fairy tale. But when a frog slowly turns into a prince (from frog to ape to man), they call that modern science? And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: 2 Thessalonians 2:11
@salonga (27963)
• Philippines
13 Feb 13
So all the more reasons to say that theory is simply foolishness. Only a fool could ever believe such kind of unbelievable things. Fantasy and reality are two different things. Surely this evolution is a work of Satan.
@flowerchilde (12518)
• United States
12 Feb 13
You're right! The theory (man's theory/adult fairy tale) is very dangerous. I read a book once called "Darwin's Plantation" which revealed some early actions based upon this theory and they were atrocious. (Accounts of how the Australian indigenous people were perceived and treated by scientists are quite shocking!) - I studied this issue sort of thoroughly a few years back and summarized the things I learned - http://inner-monastery.blogspot.com/p/faith-or-science.html (one has to scroll down a bit to get to the actual blog post). My study was very eye opening, though my overall opinion wasn't changed. I already knew it, I just didn't know the "facts" and supporting evidence. It too is actually quite shocking! - People like to claim Hitler was a christian, but he was heavily into the occult (and used mind control techniques and contortions to that end). I don't believe for an instant he had one christian speck within him. Don't forget his whole philosophy had to do with the superiority of races/rate of 'evolution'. What with measuring people's heads and all, obsessed with eye color and what not. - My latest thought has to do with how so many think natural selection is evolution, but what is natural "se-lec-tion"? It is the separating of traits already present. The separating of abilities already designed into and a part of and present in the dna code which is a part of all living things. It is NoT, nor has ever been the 'evolving' of new traits or from one kind of life or animal to another kind. Many types/species of dogs, but no dog-cats! At best natural "selection" is what is called micro evolution. If a tree has the ability present to grow longer roots than other types of tree, that tree will survive a drought and others won't - natural "selection". No new trait. - There are many ways of dating. Why at the rate helium rises, age much longer than the Bible sets down, would mean there never having been any helium (remaining). That's only one fact. I could go on and on, but I won't. Why the idea a flying squirrel as MrDawkins, top atheistic evolutionary writer, supposes, 'evolving' into a creature so light with hollow bones it can fly makes about as much sense as any 50's automobile being able to take off in flight with just one or two minor adjustments, and those randomless with no particular direction.. AnD mutations? p Puhlease. When will they stop teaching our citizens and tomorrow's citizens that there has ever (ever) been an upward progressing mutation? And these are but the tip of the iceberg.
• Italy
13 Feb 13
poor men, from what you are looking remain without intelligence , and that everything in the Bible and written the Gospel and true, Fi if someone asks a question, your son, for example, the origin del'uomo? What do you answer him-by the monkey or the Almighty God, because they are the image of God, I say I come from God, and you answer that you can give. here is wisdom
• Philippines
13 Feb 13
flowerchilde, you're absolutely right. I believe Hitler was considered a Christian because he was supported by the Roman Catholic institution. The very foundation of his faith is evolution. He thought that the Jews are the most inferior. Hitler believed that the Jews are predominantly ape so he murdered about six million of them. Evolution is also the very foundation of Marxism and communism. Karl Marx' goal is to dethrone God and destroy capitalism. Regarding natural selection, the creationists thought of it first. Yes it cannot be counted as an evidence for evolution because it selects and do not cause evolution. I failed to indicate in my discussion that there are six types of evolution and micro-evolution is the only one observed. The other five are purely religious.
@TwoEms (37)
• United States
8 Sep 15
Sheeple
Blind Faith