Isn't It Two-Faced of People/Government to Demand Separation-of-Church-&-State, and Yet to Charge Churches Money?
@mythociate (21437)
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
January 29, 2017 11:49am CST
Just a random thought here: Shouldn't 'it's for the church' be good enough to serve as payment for things?
(I know as soon as I ask that--if it were good-enough--people would misuse it enough to make it useless again 
)
It makes me think of 'the donkey used for Lord Jesus' Triumphal Entry' when Lord Jesus told His disciples just to go untie the donkey and--if anyone tried to stop them--to tell them "The LORD has need of it."
I imagine picking up a few dozen pizzas for my church and--when the workers ask me for money--just replying, "The LORD has need of them!"
Just how far do you think I'd get with them?
)
It makes me think of 'the donkey used for Lord Jesus' Triumphal Entry' when Lord Jesus told His disciples just to go untie the donkey and--if anyone tried to stop them--to tell them "The LORD has need of it."
I imagine picking up a few dozen pizzas for my church and--when the workers ask me for money--just replying, "The LORD has need of them!"
Just how far do you think I'd get with them?
If I came to you and asked if I could borrow your donkey, would you let me? You’d probably ask me what I needed him for.
1 person likes this
No responses
