More Mistakes After Editing

Tweet

For the past four months, I have been writing for a site called Vocal. There are lots of things I like about it. It has a wide range of topics, it is easy to submit, and there is feedback (plus a chance to resubmit) for articles which don't quite cut it. I don't like that the editing process seems to consist of someone using a US spell checker, changing things which don't need to be changed, and not being given the opportunity to approve or decline the edits. For the most part, it doesn't matter too much about the US/UK spellings as long as it's consistent. I did, however, have a problem with an obviously UK-specific article about UK education being changed from a perfectly good article to an article which looked unprofessional because of the editor either not actually reading the article or not taking the subject into account. I did have word about that. They didn't change it back, despite saying that they would, but they did assure me that they'd make a point of using UK English when editing my work. That's all very well but it was specifically the education article where it mattered. It seems they have stuck to that promise. However, I've recently written a couple of other articles in which there have been mistakes. Now, it is possible that they were my own mistakes but surely that's what an editor is supposed to be checking. Apart from that, one recent mistake was a 'then' where there should be a 'than'. It is something I would have noticed in my own work because it annoys me in other people's! I know it is a common mistake but you'd think someone getting paid to be an editor would know the difference. The rare mistakes I make tend to be a result of editing software autocorrecting things because the software thinks I want a different word. I usually find them during my proof-reading and correct them, though. I have made more spelling errors since the invention of spell-check than I ever did before! Anyway, my point is that it does not give the site a good name if they have editors who make changes without proof-reading, and end up with mistakes in what was previously a perfect piece of writing. It reflects poorly on the writers. I certainly don't want people to peruse my work and assume I can't spell or that I've made a mistake when, in fact, it was another person's mistake. I like writing for the site but I am being put off by their editors' lack of editing skills. If all they're going to do is run it through Copyscape and spell-check, there seems little point in having human editors.