do you think people on welfare are. . .

United States
January 17, 2007 12:58pm CST
raising kids to live on welfare. I am not putting anyone down, but think about it. If a child sees their parent sitting around and not working, what kind of example are they setting for the child? It just seems parents that work 9this includes stay at home moms) set an example for their child, they have routines and a stable life. I just feel like people that let the government take care of their families have children who expect the same. What do you think?
16 people like this
90 responses
@misskatonic (3723)
• United States
17 Jan 07
The thing is, not all people on welfare sit around and don't work. The ones who are lazy and taking advantage of it do, but the people who really need it tend to be out looking for work or networking in hopes of a job or doing *something*. If they're physically able to, of course. Or at the very least, they'll be doing what another stay at home mom or dad does - keeping the house and taking care of the kids while their spouse is working or looking for work. The ones who abuse welfare would be raising their kids poorly anyway.
5 people like this
• United States
17 Jan 07
Sorry I guess I should hve stated it clearly. I was talking about the ones who have no desire to change their lives and expect everyone to do for them.
4 people like this
@rash219 (808)
• United States
18 Jan 07
i would have to say misskatonic came straight to the point...not all parents who stay at home are lazy...there are some ppl who work out as well as take care of their kids and house....for eg. my mom works plus takes care of the house....now adays many ppl who sit at home including those who are not physically able to do work resort to the internet on site such as myLot to earn a few cents...!!
3 people like this
@kellahinx (370)
• United States
17 Jan 07
I think that you are correctly noticing a trend, but identifying the wrong cause. I think that the welfare system itself is highly flawed and encourages this vicious cycle. People go on welfare when they are hard on luck right? Most likely they don't have a job and have children to raise. But how are they going to get a job if the money they are getting from welfare is only enough to feed the family and give them a roof? They can't put their children in childcare or afford babysitters until they have an established job that they can depend on. Also, the welfare system doesn't help with people who need more education to get a job or people who's job doesn't pay well enough to support their family. Let's say you could get a job that pays $20,000/year or you could not work and get $30,000/year from the welfare system. What would you do? Then since the parents aren't able to get out of the welfare system, they don't see the benefit of education because they don't have access to it and the jobs they can get aren't going to cut it. So the kids grow up in an environment where ways to do something for free are valued over a quality education. The kids never get the education that they need to succeed and then end up in the welfare system like their parents. So the welfare parents may not be setting a good example, but I think the actual problem lies within the welfare system.
4 people like this
@emeraldisle (13139)
• United States
18 Jan 07
I wish the welfare system down here paid more then minimum wage. My sister is fighting with SSI right now so is on welfare. She gets food stamps and medicare but cash she only gets $241 a month for her and her daughter. This is supposed to pay for her housing and all other essentials for the two of them that is not food based. Let me tell you that doesn't go far. Also for her to get that money she has to go to unemployment everyweek and do volunteer work 20 hours a week, even though her doctor says she cannot work. She actually had to volunteer at unemployment because of her meds no one else would take her. If she doesn't do the volunteer work she loses her money. So for this area it's not worth being on welfare if you don't have to be.
2 people like this
• United States
17 Jan 07
I do know that there are flaws in the system, but nothing will change if people are not working. I think it is a full time job to find work. I could not imagine setting that as an example for my kids. I do think that more grants should be available for education as well.
3 people like this
• United States
18 Jan 07
It is a cycle that never ends and that makes no sence.
1 person likes this
@itsjustmeb (1212)
• Canada
17 Jan 07
Not everyone on welfare sits around and does nothing. I don't know about where you are from, but I know here if you are a single person in reciept of welfare you have to go to information sessions, work classes ETC before they will hand you a welfare check. However with that said if you have kids, you have up until your youngest child turns 3 to just sit around on welfare, then they make you go back to work. However some people just sit there and keep having kid after kid so they don't have to work, and to me personally that is truly sad. But you can't tell a person not to have kids, and you can't take away their right to procreate. So here we have all these kids sitting on welfare. Personally I have been on welfare . I HATED IT. I hated having to report to someone every month just for the little bit of money they give you. I hated the fact that they only give you a small amount of money each month to live off of, and if something happens like a high hydro bill or phone bill, they won't help you. So you end up having to find other means to feed your kids. I haven't been on welfare in now almost 3 years, and unless something major happens, I will NEVER go back to it. Ever. But for those people who raise kids on the system, I think sometimes it can make those kids lazy but some kids (like myself) would rather have a different life. Me, i'd rather NOT raise my kids on welfare, and I have shown this to them by letting go of the system. I think they need to re vamp their rules and regulations as well, they let far too many people have the money when they don't need it. I mean what irks me is those people who walk into the welfare office with a ton of kids, and gold on every finger. If you can afford that much gold, you can get off your butt to work.
4 people like this
• United States
18 Jan 07
I was at the dentist today, the dentist office is across the street from the welfare office. There is parking out front for the clients at the welfare office, I saw many cars -- brand new and people get out with 3, 4, 5 kids and go in. Tell me the lady driving the escalade needed the welfare check.
1 person likes this
• United States
17 Jan 07
for those not aware of the law, unless a person is classified as disabled, When President Clinton was in office he instituted the " Back To Work Program" women after having a child must return to work by the time the child is 12 months old. They can only continue getting welfare if they are earning no more than $1.00 above minimum wage. The welfare acts as a supplement for food stamps or medical. This law was enacted to prevent what you are describing. Unless the woman decides to become a baby manufacturing machine pumping ot a kid each year, she will have to return to work. Either way the program is set up to monitor through the IRS how much the welfare applicant is earning and immediately cut them off at the month they earn more than $1.00 over min wage. In addition if they are overpayed, they must then re-pay welfare the amount. So I hope I explained that the laws have chaged where women can no longer just sit around on welfare unless they are classified as disabled.
• United Kingdom
17 Jan 07
I don't know about American law but I think that's awful, being expected to go back to work by the time your child is 12 months. What's the point in having the child then? Doesn't the American government realise how important it is for children to be with their mother for the first 3 to 5 years? I understand about the benefits, obviously people shouldn't keep popping out kids just to stay on benefits, but if there's something which has happened through no fault of her own, why should both the mother and child be punished by forcing the mother to neglect her child?
3 people like this
• United Kingdom
17 Jan 07
Well, that is bad. The system isn't that friendly in the UK. You get almost enough to live on, I think it's something like an average of whatever the government thinks your bills and food might be. There is no allowance for clothes or anything else. But for the situation you just mentioned, that is bad. There is no reason why both of them should be on welfare. One of them should be made to get a job and they should have money taken away. They are obviously just playing the system and getting away with it.
2 people like this
• United States
17 Jan 07
Just to let you know that might be the law. My next door neighbor, who is also my ex -- I have 3 girls to him, the youngest is 4 -- lives off of welfare. Him and his wife of 3 years live off of welfare, they also have 3 kids together ages 2, 1, 3 mo. oops oh she just got pregnant again because welfare wasn't paying them enough. Neither of them work or have any desire to work. . . .welfare pays all of their bills. They were only name brand clothes, because welfare gave them each $150 clothing shopping allowance. Welfare has also bought them 4 cars in 3 years. . . . .Neither one is disabled, they are just attached to their bed and the baby making business. How is such a thing possible?
3 people like this
@mari61960 (4893)
• United States
17 Jan 07
I understand what you mean. There are many mothers and fathers relying on Welfare to help them through. Not all of them are sittng around collecting money and help out of need. Alot of them are just hanging out all day and making babies so they can. Those are the type of people that make it difficult for those that are really in need. I think it's fine for a single mother to remain on welfare when her child is young and she is trying to help herself and child in the meantime to better their life. But I would like to something about the abusers.
• United States
17 Jan 07
I understand about the baby makers, it upsets me. I could not imagine bringing another child into this world if I couldn't afford the first.
2 people like this
17 Jan 07
No, my parents have been on benefits (welfare) most of mu life because they have arthritis and are unable to work. As soon as I was old enough to get a paper round, and then a part time job I was encouraged to do so. I had to pay my way through university when I did my degree as they were unable to support me and now I am re-training as a operating department practitioner so I can work in making people better. It doesnt make children think it is an easy life - and my parents dont sit around either, my dad is currently studying a law degree and my mum did a history degree when i was at secondary school. I dont see how you can be happy to benefits, I was made redundant a few months ago (before I went back to university) and the amount of money they expect you to live on whilst paying all your bills is so low that you are living nothing but a life of stress and depression, the only people I can see who are genuinely comfortable living on benefits are those more than likely cheating the system.
4 people like this
• United Kingdom
17 Jan 07
I'm so glad to see this! I was also brought up on benefits and, although I was on benefits myself for a while, it's not something I would choose nor choose for my children. My 7 year old already has a few ideas about what he wants to do(which, if he doesn't change his mind, will have to involve going to college and possibly university). I still stay home with the kids but my partner works so it's not too bad now, but I would never encourage my kids to be on benefits. It's certainly not the easy life some people think it is. And I definitely agree with the last part of what you said. I know some people who do seem to have everything, going on two or three holidays a year, having a nice car, etc. even though they are on benefits. I think that kind of person is a huge problem because they are obviously cheating the system but give other genuine people a bad name because they make it look as though you're better off on benefits. (Well, to be honest, I'm sure there are people who really would be better off but I would still rather my kids went to work. And as for your kids thinking your lazy, I never thought my mum was lazy for looking after me and my sisters and my kids don't think I'm lazy for staying home with them.
3 people like this
• United States
17 Jan 07
Good for both of you. I have only been on Food Stamps (and believe me it didn't begin to meet our food needs) and medical coverage for my daughter. But it was hard to get by with such a little amount of assistance. I worked and went to college (I went back to school at age 28) and when my daughter turned 12 I was still in school and "they" cut my food stamps down to $12.00 (yes twelve bucks) because my daughter was twelve....Do they stop eating at age twelve? Well I decided that it wasn't worth the hassle for that measly sum and just barely got by on child support and my student loans. I am now out of school and have my own website and work seosonally as a tax preparer. I do not recieve assistance but have applied for medicaid as I recently hurt my ankle (really bad I am on crutches and have a splint) to help with the medical bills as I don't have insurance on myself.
3 people like this
• United States
18 Jan 07
I can totally understand if people have a medical condition to be on welfare. I think welfare should be something used for only a short time.
1 person likes this
@rmuxagirl (7548)
• United States
17 Jan 07
I think sometimes children who see their parents just sitting around and living on welfare realize that is not how they want to live. I mean stay at home moms are different they do a lot of work around the house and errands during the day, take care of children and so much more.
4 people like this
• United States
17 Jan 07
More children should want to be more in life, but without the proper role model I don't see it happening. It is like the parents who drop out of high school and let their kids do the same.
2 people like this
@pumpkinjam (8539)
• United Kingdom
17 Jan 07
No, I don't think that. If you have children, assuming you are looking after them properly, you are not sitting around doing nothing all day, as is so often assumed. I know there are some people who bring their children up that way and their children follow suit because they think it is easy but they are the ones whose parents really have sat around doing nothing and not brought up their kids properly. Just because you go to work, doesn't mean your kids will anyway. I am at home with my kids, they see all the things I do, but their dad goes to work and doesn't do anything at home, so to them, he doesn't do anything. If you bring your children up properly, they will understand about getting a job. It's as simple as that. I mean, if there are two parents in the family then there is no reason for one not to work, but if you are a single parent (assuming you are a good parent of course) it's better that you are at home with your kids. You can't do that and work so if you are a single parent and you want to look after your own children then how else can you do it?
3 people like this
• United States
18 Jan 07
Well I am a single parent, I work 40+ hours a week. I also work at a tattoo and body piercing studio for extra cash on the weekends. The only way to reach success in life is to work. Ten years ago I was homeless with just the clothes on my back. I had to work to get where I am today.
1 person likes this
@disvachic (10117)
• United States
17 Jan 07
I support the system for a temporary situation and not a permanent situation like some people might use it as.There are times when people may have hard times and need the help until they are able to get on their feet.I support the government in this as a temporary situation and for those who are low income and really need the assistance to help them survive in the world.
4 people like this
• United States
17 Jan 07
I really think people who receive welfare should look at it as a gift. I agree with it being temporary, I just feel like too many take advantage of the system.
2 people like this
@mystikel (577)
• Australia
17 Jan 07
I am in Australia and things are a bit different here. I am a single mum and on welfare but I also have a casual job to pay for the extra things in life like clothes etc. The government here makes you report every fortnight what you have earnt and then they decide what you get paid from the pension(welfare) They encourage you back to work once the child is 6 and started school, however my baby is only 21 months old and I have been doing casual work for nearly a year now. Cant afford the extras in life if I dont work. They also encourage study, they give you extra money if you goto TAFE or university as this will help you get a job. Of course there are people who are lazy on the system and just sit around the house drinking, smoking and the kids run wild, but me personally I couldnt do that. Have too much self respect for it.
• United States
19 Jan 07
I am glad that you are taking advantage of earning extra money. Hopefully you will be able to better your education too. Best of luck
1 person likes this
@Netsbridge (3253)
• United States
17 Jan 07
I, too, share your views on this matter and much more. Although I do not think that government should fail to help its people if need be, I, however, think there ought to be some time limit as to just how long it should assist any one person or family! I also think that government assistance should immediately seize, if a woman who came into the program with just one or two children, bears another child while still on the program and not married! I have heard several female US nationals and residents opt to have children, regardless, and do not care who the father or sperm donor is, just so they can get on welfare. There are several females in the USA who believe life will be much easier for them if they can only have children and get on welfare! Again, I believe the USA welfare is in fact a form of slavery, geared to control and keep taps on the people! Although helpful to some degree, the program truly encourages dependency and inactivity.
• United States
17 Jan 07
thank you for your input. I think something should be done about more kids being born while the parents are on welfare.
2 people like this
@gifana (4833)
• Portugal
17 Jan 07
There are also some men who have three or four single females who he keeps pregnant just so that he can get the child welfare as well as the normal welfare. I heard that the worse offenders are in California but don't quote me on it. In some of these cases I feel that perhaps one way to overcome this, in the case of very young single girls, would be to have temporary sterilization (tie the tubes). Also if a man were caught in this fraud and has a flock of kids then he should be "translated" from a tenor to a soprano forever. You can bet your bottem dollar that as long as men control this government the latter will never come to pass. We talk of the money going down the drain in Iraq....let's look at home and clean up that hole and give the ones who actually need welfare the most benefits.
@34momma (13882)
• United States
17 Jan 07
As a mother who use to collect welfare, i think there may be some truth to that but that doesn't apply to everyone. i personally did it because i was a young mother of two children on my own. I went back to school and got me a job. welfare helped me do that. they payed for child care, gave me carfare and paid for books. could i have gone to school and paid for these things without welfare, i doubt it. i am grateful they were there for me when i needed it. and now i have moved on
@gifana (4833)
• Portugal
17 Jan 07
I commend you. Would that more were like you who would use the aid that welfare provided to make a better life for yourself and your children. There are many more like you who have their pride and are only on welfare hopefully as an interim buffer until such time as they can get on their feet and hence off welfare. By doing this you have given a good example to your children of what can be done if you put your mind and your hard work into something worthwhile. I take my hat off to you.
1 person likes this
• United States
18 Jan 07
I am glad that you were helped. My post is about the people who just keep having more kids to stay on welfare and have no desire to go out of the system.
1 person likes this
• United States
19 Jan 07
People who need the help aren't sitting on their butts. My best friend is a single mom with 2 small children. Her hubby left her. She works fulltime nights and it barely covers her rent. The SYSTEM gave her $69 in food stamps per month and medical insurance for her kids. Yes, she is getting welfare but she is not sitting on her butt.
• Canada
17 Jan 07
My mother is on welfare (not by choice), and the thing it has taught me the most is that I will not rely on the government to feed or clothe me, they do not try to help people at all and I want the be the only person responsible to take care of myself.
• United States
18 Jan 07
I am unsure as to why you say they don't try to help . . .people get checks every month, free health care, foodstamps, help with child care
1 person likes this
• United States
26 Feb 07
Not everyone on welfare can get the free childcare. The checks every month do not pay for rent, electricity, heat and basic phone service, along with everything else that is necessary to run a household. Foodstamps are not enough to cover all the food you eat, even when you also have WIC. You do not necessarily get great healthcare, certainly not the best in many situations, and not the best prescriptions either. As soon as you go to work to get ahead, you lose your benenfits, sometimes even medical, so a lot of people end up evicted from their homes in the process, or right back on the state. A single mother will not always make sufficient money to support all of her children, and child support (as in my case) may be as low as only $9.00 per week. If men were forced to have to pay for half of everything their children need, and not be allowed to "get out of it" for any reason, there would not be as big a need for welfare money. I wish that people would stop putting all the blame on, and bashing, the single mom, when the father is just as responsible. More so, if he is not helping financially.
• India
18 Jan 07
i don't know whether I have understood what u are saying correctly..therefore without directly responding to the querry I would say that parents do set an example for the child and the childs learns the most from parents..so I would agree that its necessary that parents create an environment which has more good things than the bad ones..as this would help in all round growth of the child..
2 people like this
@sweetdesign (5142)
• United States
17 Jan 07
Well firstly not everyone that recieves government assistance in one form or another be it food stamps, a check, or just medical coverage are mooching off the government or not working. Some are needing help do to the amount of children they have or the poor economics of where they live and thier education level dictating what kind of job they can do. That said..... I do believe that for some (and sadly there are lots of them) that do bilk the system to thier advantage. I know of one such family. The mother got pregnant everytime the father of the children (not her husband) got out of jail to the tune of 11 times. In the state this family lived as long as you had atleast one child under 5 years old then you didn't have to seek employment.....so she kept popping them out like a pez dispencer gone berserk. She had such a horrible time delivering the last one (because her body was plain worn out) that her doctor performed a tubal ligation....so guess what in two years she has to get a job or lose her benefits. Being on the system does not automatically set your children up for failure it is how you decide to deal with your situation and how you train up your kids. Yes in many instances welfare is a "heridatary" decease but it doesn't have to be. Oh and in many cases the system it self is set up to keep the person on the system by taking away all the assistance all at once instead of gradually weaning them from it.
2 people like this
• United States
19 Jan 07
That is a shame that the family you know is doing that. I feel that people should be limited on the amount of children they can have on welfare. If someone goes on welfare with so many kids, they should not continue to keep having children they can't support.
1 person likes this
@anja31 (708)
• Canada
17 Jan 07
not everyone is lazy to work who is on welfare. SOme of the people can find a job even though they have a good education This has the same meaning as stay at home mom. I cant not understand your discussion because this make me really mad.
• United States
18 Jan 07
I didn't say taht everyone on welfare was lazy, I just think that more people should be looking for a job. I am a single parent, I work.
1 person likes this
@meme0907 (3481)
• United States
18 Jan 07
I don't follow that train of thought-children who grow up poor want more than anything not to be poor & I believe most ppl on gov assistance don't want it for themselves either-sometimes ppl get caught up in a bad situation & need help. NOBODY wants to live poor or give the gov free reign to snoop into their personal lives
2 people like this
• United States
18 Jan 07
Sorry this one is slitghtly touchy subject for me. See I was raised by a stay at home mom. She had welfare and medicaid for her three girls. When we were young she tried to work but my dad was off god knows where and it was getting difficult for her to afford daycare or a babysitter. She however taught to work for what we want, always be on time, and try to do for yourself unless absolutely necessary. I do agree that many abuse the system but there are those like my mother who used it for what is was ment for temporary assistance untill you are able to take care of yourself and children. I am appalled at those who abuse it. they're the ones who ruin it for those who really need the assistance and make it more difficult for them to recieve it. In all honesty yes I would love to be a stay at home mom some day however In this day it takes a two incomes survive. I dont expect anything for free and I've worked for everything I have.
2 people like this
• United States
18 Jan 07
Wow, tough topic. I don't see how anyone survives on welfare $ anyway, life is so expensive! Especially if one has children, it can seem more expensive TO work, having to send the kids to daycare, commuting, extra childcare (I remember having that gap in time where my work schedule ended and I knew I'd never make it to the daycare before they closed--so I had to pay someone else to pick the kids and then commute there. It was exhausting.)
2 people like this