Ron Paul outperformed Giuliani in New Hampshire

United States
January 13, 2008 2:46pm CST
This is related to those other posts (some I have started) that moan and complain about Ron Paul not getting enough coverage (except when they make fun of Giuliani for finishing below Paul in Iowa and barely edging him out in New Hampshire). Anyway, I was looking at the County by County results in New Hampshire and there can be made an argument that Ron Paul performed better than Giuliani. Some of these counties only had about a dozen voters, but generally, the county results went: McCain, Romney, Huckabee, Giuliani, then Paul. Sometimes Paul would be fourth to Giuliani's fifth. Here is what was interesting about the results. Giuliani didn't finish higher than third in any county, while Paul finished second a couple of times and even won a county. And while the county he won was a small one, it wasn't one of those tiny ones. I don't expect the news media to pick up on this, but even if they did, they'd probably still ignore Paul while they keep mentioning Thompson and Giuliani.
No responses