Am I just confused here?
By cortjo73
@cortjo73 (6498)
United States
March 17, 2008 5:19pm CST
Natalie, and someone else in the Ryan, Adam, Sheila, Natalie and Matt alliance has mentioned that Sharon should be ticked at her alliance because "they all rolled on her last week when she was on the block." I'm sorry! Maybe it is just me that is a complete idiot here but, when did Sharon's alliance (which includes Josh, James and Chelsia) roll on her when she was on the block last week. The only person that voted to evict her was Chelsia...and what should she have expected given her relationship with James. Josh voted to evict James. So, please...if you understand Natalie, Matt, Ryan, Adam and Sheila's thinking about "Sharon's whole alliance" "rolling on her" last week, please explain to this idiot! Cause, I really could use the enlightenment. I need to be smarter and, I am obviously struggling in the intelligence department as I can't figure this out!
1 person likes this
6 responses
@vivasuzi (4127)
• United States
18 Mar 08
No ideas here either! Of course Chelsea can't be counted b/c she would not vote for James. But everyone else was on Sharon's side and in the end, Josh and Sharon still appear to be very close. I think the Ryan alliance is probably just trying to stir up so trouble... besides being paranoid :)
1 person likes this
@cortjo73 (6498)
• United States
18 Mar 08
I think it really is about their paranoia running rampant. And, I think they know they are about to lose one of their alliance members and they are trying to make themselves feel better by talking false trash about the other group. LOL! Whatever floats their boat!
1 person likes this
@vivasuzi (4127)
• United States
19 Mar 08
Yeah it really doesn't make much sense. I feel like that group of James and friends is sticking together better than Ryan's alliance ever did. James told all his friends his plans for tonight so you can tell he trusts them all and they trust him.
However after tonight I saw that Ryan is still under the misconception that Josh has his back, so perhaps he thinks Josh is really on his side and therefore stabbing Sharon in the back.
1 person likes this
@sunshine4 (8703)
• United States
18 Mar 08
Maybe she was thinking that if Chelsia and Sharon were both kept on the block together that James and Josh had planned on voting Sharon out rather thanChelsia. That is all I can think of.
Otherwise, it is all gameplay and they will say anything to get someone mad.
@vivasuzi (4127)
• United States
18 Mar 08
Well that could be it, b/c I think James put Chelsea up as a pawn if you recall saying she would have the votes to stay. So possibly the plan was to get rid of Sharon, and then when it came to Sharon/James, they decided to get rid of James instead.
1 person likes this
@cortjo73 (6498)
• United States
18 Mar 08
I don't know. I can't remember where Josh's mind was then. I would swear that he was planning on voting out Chelsia at that point. But, people don't tend to settle on anything in the house until the Veto so, no one can be held to what they say until after the Veto is won and used or not used.
And, as far as trying to make someone mad, they were only talking amongst themselves. Natalie didn't say anything to Sharon about it. So, if anything, they were just trying to lift one another up inside their own alliance. Trying to build strength by saying something like, "We would never do that to one another." When, the truth of the matter is, heck yes they would!
1 person likes this
@starr4all (2863)
•
18 Mar 08
Well, if it's natalie saying it, it's just her being her. She's not the brightest crayon in the box.
1 person likes this
@Penguinsangel (3498)
• United States
17 Mar 08
I really couldn't tell you either. I think half of the things they say this season just don't make any sense or don't understand why they believe it.
1 person likes this
@minnie_98214 (10557)
• United States
18 Mar 08
Youre not alone lol. They will say anything at this point to try and get them on their side its silly. They know they are losing the power of having the largest alliance and they want to fix that so they are gonna say anything to break them up. The house is full of lies so many I cant keep em straight.
1 person likes this
@KrisNY (7590)
• United States
18 Mar 08
I agree with you… Who else could it have been… that is it with the alliance.. the 4 of them- and obviously Chelsia could not vote to Evict Sharon- All the votes were for James- except Chelsia… So whoever is talking smack—is just wrong. Makes no sense to me-- I can’t wait for tonight to see who wins POV… and if they use it- I’m sure you already know but I haven’t seen it yet!
1 person likes this
@cortjo73 (6498)
• United States
18 Mar 08
Oops...I thought you already knew who won POV and if it was used! I think I might have spoilered it in another response to another of your responses to me. Sorry! I hope I didn't ruin it for you!
And, I don't get their thought process because, only 2 from their side could vote and, you know that Chelsia wasn't going to vote out James and Josh, while questionable, is basically a loyal guy so, he stuck with his ex-partner Sharon. This whole bit about all of them rolling over on Sharon is just stupid. James couldn't vote. And, let's just say it had gone the other way and that Chelsia had remained on the block. Well, then the vote would still have been Josh for Sharon and James for Chelsia. So, no one rolled over on Sharon. It was split and rightfully so. Idiots!
