This one for the ladies...

hee-hee....and think of the massive fur balls he would cough up....LOL

Tell us how you really feel already. Brosnan was a character actor for sure, but I do not believe that Ford can be compared this way. He has done too many diverse roles in movies.... Plus, it's not like there really is a man trasping around in caves, running for ancient artifacts that are boobytrapped by ancient tribes and be that afraid snakes as well as being a HOT professor who brings up class attendance by his hotness....okay what was my point...oh yeah.. Fantasy is a wonderful thing sometimes.....and Indiana fits the bill. You didn't like Patriot Games, or The Fugitive....

Hi again, Patriot Games and The Fugitive were good films, but they're also good examples of Harrison Ford's one-dimensionality. All he had to do was play his own regular serious-faced self. Which is as well, because that's about his limit. Any role which requires a bit of humor or romantic interest really strains credibility. The guy just isn't a natural actor - he's good in roles which match his limited grimacing repertoire, but is badly placed in anything with more depth than that. Similar to Pierce Brosnan - way too reserved and serious for anything more than a serious, doggedly-determined action role (which the Bond movies gave him). If you want to see a REAL actor with incredible versatility and depth, I'd suggest someone like John Lithgow or even that other old Bond favorite, Sean Connery (who managed to convincingly act the part of a Russian submarine commander, complete with Scottish accent). But I'd say Lithgow is the more talented f the two, if pressed for a choice. Ford is probably a good choice for a geriatric toy-boy, so long as it's strictly limited to the imagination. He's probably too cranky for it to work in real life.

How you know I work with old people....geriactric boy toy LOL Well, I guess I can see some of your points on depth as an actor...and mainly it was through yoiur mentioning of Lithgow. It is very hard for a comedian to cross over into serious roles....which makes me think of Steve Martin in Grand Canyon (seen that one?). It definitely says a lot about them as actors. But on Pierce he will always be and probably only be best at his Remington Steele moments (which was a tv knock off of the Bond movies.) But hey, this is the year of Retro (as I put it at work) and I am all about retro stuff. And I have to admit all things I loved as a kid are coming back not only Jones, but and you can bash me if you want New kids....haha You seem to know a little about movies and cinema stuff. You ever take a film apprec class? I loved it when I took mine....real eye opener haven't been able to just watch a movie since....