GOD & Darwin agree. SOCIALISM IS DOOMED!
@redyellowblackdog (10629)
United States
June 29, 2008 10:46am CST
Yes, it is true.
While the proponents of Darwinism are often at odds with the proponents of God, there is an area in which they can agree. What's that? Socialism/Communism is DOOMED!
Yes, it is true.
Take a gander at these statistics, straight from that most accurate source of good information on the planet earth, the CIA.
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2127rank.html
It is usually regarded that an average birthrate of 2.1 children per woman is required to maintain population numbers at a constant level. Look down thru this list until you find the number 2.1. Are most of the Socialist/Communist countries above or below the the break even birthrate of 2.1?
Yes, it is true!
Socialism/Communism is doomed!
How could this possibly be true?
One possibiblity is having government through socialism/communism replace the family structure to a certain degree diminshes the need for couples to have children. Don't believe it? Look again at the list.
Now, let's listen to Darwin for a minute.
Darwin tells us that the most successful reproductive members of a species will crowd out the lesser successful reproductive members of the species.
Therefore, all the countries at the top of the reproduction fertility list are, in fact, taking over the world while those at the bottom are slowly being pushed out.
The process of Natural Selection works slowly, but as the Socialist/Communist countries are mostly below the magic number of 2.1 children per woman, eventually there will be no more Socialist/Communist countries. THEY ARE DOOMED!
Do you find fault with this analysis? In what way could this analysis be wrong?
1 person likes this
2 responses
@Destiny007 (5805)
• United States
29 Jun 08
This analysis fails to take into account the gradual destruction of the family unit with the introduction of rampant homosexual agenda.
Between this aspect and the constant assault on traditional family values by the different agendas, the US population is going to drop as well.
I also wonder if abortion is considered in this study, or is it confined to actual births?
As the US is becoming more Socialist all the time, it won't be long before our extinction as well.
3 people like this
@redyellowblackdog (10629)
• United States
29 Jun 08
Many believe socialism, the rampant homosexual agenda, and abortion are all attacks on the family. That is, they are part and parcel of the same thing.
Your point concerning the USA is well made and the USA is only slightly above the point where it would lose population. We are sliding down the 'slippery slope'.
There is something serious still left out of the analysis, but I'll save those thoughts for later. People will not like it.
1 person likes this
@redyellowblackdog (10629)
• United States
29 Jun 08
You have to copy and paste the link or type it in. The CIA is now using https (encrypted) instead of http. The myLot program does not recognize https as constituting a proper address for a hyperlink. Sorry.
1 person likes this
@gewcew23 (8007)
• United States
29 Jun 08
Population either means success or disaster for a country. Countries need population growth for long term projects. Growth means more taxpayers in the future so your country can offset some if not all present debt for future generations. Really this is not a bad thing even though some like to criticize this procedure, but future generations should pay for the benifets they enjoy. A new interstate will not just benifit just todays generations but will also benifits tomorrows generations. So why should not the future help in the paying of the cost to build it. Problem come up when populations do not grow, because of less taxpayer in the future. Because of this less can be passed on to then next generation. More of the debt will have to be paid by current generations. Due to this less wealth will be created, because more money is going to pay off debt. Less wealth being created in todays time, means less wealth for future generation will have to enjoy.
There is one problem with your analysis is homosexuals. Socialist and Communist countries have less homosexuals. Homosexuality has a negitive impact on population growth, because of their inablity to procreated own their own. Only lesbians can procreated but not on thier own, gays can only adopt. Adoption can only move population, and does not create poulation. Adoption is like growing your country through immigration, nothing to base the future of your country on.
Abortion is something that can be added to your analysis, though I do not know which side of the arguement has more abortions. America has had about 40 million abortion since Roe vs Wade. About 20 million of those aborted would be taxpayers right now. It takes about 19 years to create a new taxpayer.
@redyellowblackdog (10629)
• United States
29 Jun 08
19 years to create a new taxpayer or a new benefits receipant? That's part of the problem with socialism.
Your points about abortion and homosexuality are correct in that I left them out. I only wish I'd left them out on purpose, but no, I just forgot about them. They, too, are an attack on family. I wonder why there is so much to undermine the family? It is curious.
1 person likes this
@Destiny007 (5805)
• United States
30 Jun 08
Because when you undermine the family it creates a void that the government types can fill with their "It takes a village" attitudes.
When the family unit is destroyed, and family values no longer apply, then the schools and the government becomes the parents... or the mentors, if you prefer to think of it in those terms.
With the family no longer in charge of teaching the moral values, the schools are free to indoctrinate the children into whatever beliefs that the government dictates.
This has been going on for a very long time, and started with the Humanist movement.
That is why there are so many attempts to outlaw Homeschooling, because those kids can't be programmed if they are not in public school.
1 person likes this
