700 Billion Bailout
@melvinandheather1 (540)
United States
October 1, 2008 9:35pm CST
What are your opinions on the 700 Billion bailout that passed in Congress? I know that they had to revise the older one, but have just passed the new one. What exactly does this bill say? And what will the effects be on the middle class? I know that if they did not pass it we would end up being a lot worse off then if they did, but how so?
How is this bill going to change things for the average person. I am not a homeowner, although I would like to be, i can't get a loan. Is this bill going to change that? What is going to be the effects, it seems as if nothing is explained clearly enough to me on the television for me to completely understand this bill.
If anyone can help please do so, I would really like to know about it.
1 person likes this
6 responses
@mscott (1923)
• United States
2 Oct 08
I don't think the bailout will help most of us at all. The original plan was basically giving money to the people who screwed everything up in the first place and that doesn't seem to promising. I was surprised though that it got voted down. Now the senate added a bunch more money which gives extra money to all their little favorites and it looks like it will pass. Sure seems like the people who made millions off these messes are getting off pretty easily. When Enron had this mess they prosecuted people, now these guys pull this stuff with companies like Fannie and Freddie and we give them more money? Doesn't that seem fishy? 

@melvinandheather1 (540)
• United States
4 Oct 08
Hopefully this go around possibly some of the "bigtimers" will see their mistakes (unlikely) and try to make it better this go around. They are getting a second wind so to speak, but hopefully the wind doesn't get knocked out of them once more. I am hoping that they will learn and grow off the first major drop, however, I think that they are going to try to rack up as much money as possible just in case the market does crash. That's my personal opinion.
Me personally, If i was them, i would definately be taking it slower this go around. Kind of like find the errors in your work thing. Try to slow down maybe take a step back and realize there is only so much that one can do, before it can't happen anymore. But I don't think that will happen, not everyone learns from their mistakes, and I think that this bailout will bail them out for a little while so they can make more, and we will all have to pay eventually for them getting richer. Don't ya just love it (sarcastic). Thanks for the responce.
@xfahctor (14113)
• Lancaster, New Hampshire
3 Oct 08
It is ilegal. It circumvents the constitution and creates essentialy a 4th branch of government. This fourth branch is on;y checked and balanced by the executive branch. In addition, it is based on faulty data and alarmism. It has been shoved and strong-armed through the senate and the house now.

@xfahctor (14113)
• Lancaster, New Hampshire
4 Oct 08
it would be nice if it was in the same checks and balance system, unfortunately, it isn't though. I'm doing a bunch of research now and in another day or so willbe posting a detailed thread on it. It is more insidious then most people are aware.
@melvinandheather1 (540)
• United States
4 Oct 08
Very good viewpoints, however, if it is a 4th brance then it will have the same circulatory as the other branches, meaning it will have to pass through all of the other 3 before becoming something that everyone has to live with (a bill passed). The government does not relinquish a 4th post unless it is much needed, and is able to be checked by all of the other branches as well as the ones that are currently existing.
I do completely agree that it has been shoved and strong-armend through the senate and the house and was done so by the executive branch, however, something had to be done, and I believe that they had a group think to come up with it (although group thinks never have the outcomes that they origionally came for). Thanks so much for the responce.

@suspenseful (40192)
• Canada
2 Oct 08
Well the reason you cannot get a loan is because of those people who got loans who could not afford to pay back and they got loans because they used guilt to get it. They got the loans and sub prime mortgages because they were Black because if they did not get their loans, they would cry racist! So you and others are suffering because of these people who did not pay.
These people should not have gotten a loan or been able to buy a house either. The bill had to be paid because if not, America would be in worse safe. Oh it was not Bush and the Republicans to blame for this mess. It was the Democrats who persuaded that Fannie Mae and these other mortgage companies give out sub prime loan to those who could not afford it. Now house prices are going down. So if you have enough money saved for a substantial down payment, it might be a good idea to try to get a house now.
@melvinandheather1 (540)
• United States
4 Oct 08
I really don't think that this is an issue of race. I mean referring to an ethnic group as a disclaimer in this arguement is really bias and uncalled for. If you study in any type of major degree program you will learn that it is much harder for an ethnic person of any diversity to receive any type of loan rather than someone who is caucassion. So race had nothing to do with it, and to say that it did is very bias and uncalled for.
That is not the reason everyone is looking at Fannie Mae for a quick excuse to a much larger problem. Yes Fannie Mae gives loans to underprivledged persons, however they are loans, and the ones who are lucky enough to receive something for free aren't living the dream life, they are struggling worse than you could imagine. I enjoy responces, however, next time try to make it less bias before you respond to one of my discussions.
@xParanoiax (6987)
• United States
2 Oct 08
...wasn't it passed in a night time session in the Senate? Gosh, I'm so out of the loop today. But that's what I heard. *shrugs*
From what I'm able to tell, it's very similiar to the old bail out bill, only it has alot of benefits for the upper class tacked on it now and probably other useless crap that helps nothing (like last time, with money tacked on to be spent on other things we can't afford that has nothing to do with our current economic situation).
As for what the bill will do, other than bail out banks...I think it'll end up smarting due to the fact that actually more than 700b will be the total once this is all done. And since it's likely we're gonna borrow and just print that money...this equals nothing really that good. Trading problems for more problems.
I don't know that much though, because I slept through the news and it happened too late in the day for the internet to have caught up yet. *sighs*
In the old bill, the reason why we would've been worse off was this list of reasons:
An unelected official would've been given power over the market, and in extension to the rest of us.
It'd be rewarding bad behavior from people who've put us all in danger.
And last but definitely not least: it would've put inflation through the roof which would've meant the dollar's value would've hit zero...and when you literally have no money, anywhere, because it literally becomes just a piece of paper -- the system collapses.
The affects would not have been felt immediately, but compared to some pain and regular trouble in the market...I think complete system collapse is worse, wouldn't you say?
If this does not address inflation, this bill, if it's borrowing and printing money...it doesn't really matter if oversight is tacked on and rules are applied to make sure the banks don't screw us somemore for the generosity the government's showing them. I mean of course those things are good, but if it's a giant step in the direction of destruction...obviously it doesn't matter.
I'm sure you can guess what that'd mean for you and me.
Again, I'm out of the loop though. I have no idea what the words of this bill are, none of us will probably know for awhile. All I know is what the old bill was and meant.
Mind you, I hate sounding like a doom and gloom type of person...but this is serious s***.
Mind you, I hate sounding like a doom and gloom type of person...but this is serious s***.
@xParanoiax (6987)
• United States
3 Oct 08
It doesn't help this all seems to be moving so quickly.
I've been looking for more news on all the protests going on about the bail out.
Last time, the reason why it failed was because our representatives were hounded by people telling them not to do it. Their inboxes were flooded. Lotsa phone calls. Angry people on the radio. And mass protests. Over 200 across forty states, I heard, possibly more.
Since this has started back up, there's been a scattering of other protests.
On Broadway, in different areas of New York, California, Washington.
The problem is, I don't think they're listening. I mean I thought that's why we had this whole system of government? Aren't they supposed to be listening to us? If they're getting more feedback than they can keep up with saying "DON'T DO IT" then...shouldn't they say "OK, fine, fine. I think it's a mistake..but we do work for you guys."?
This is only one of the things that's really bothering me though.
Another few things that really gets me, is how this problem gave us signs throughout this year which were...for the most part, ignored by all the bigwigs.
"It's not that bad. It's just a slowdown".
Right.
And how Paulson said that the $700b part of the bill was just a number they pulled out of the air because they "wanted a really big number"...I mean WTF.
I PRAY it's only a deep recession because that'd be bad enough...but with the stakes so high -- which more and more data is coming out to suggest that they may be even higher than we think if that's even at all possible -- the end result of what this problem may really be, may be even worse.
The problem is, not everyone has all the information...and those who could get all the information if they wanted to aren't really doing it.
And the only people who've been right about this thing, are telling us things that're enough to make everyone paranoid and fear for the worst.
So...blah. We need more info. I'll keep my eyes out, of course and I know everyone else is doing the same. So hopefully we won't be walking into the future of our economy blind. We can hope, right?
@melvinandheather1 (540)
• United States
3 Oct 08
I am right there with you, I am out of the loop. You are exactly correct, thisis a serious situation, and i feel that we need to be better informed about it since it will be effecting every single one of us. I feel that we are being blindsided by something that should be right in front of us. It's unfair to make people wonder exactly what our elected officials are voting on, especially when it could mean a major recession (worse than we are in now), or a complete restoration.
I would really like to know all of the facts that come along with this bill, and how it will affect, not a homeowner, not a CEO, not a Wall Street, but the average working man and woman, like my family and I. I am really concerned that we may be getting into something that we can't pay back. I hope that is not the case, but I also hope that this bill will help out families just like mine, including us. Thanks so much for the quick responce.

@sugarplum9084 (1771)
• United States
2 Oct 08
I don't see anything good about this bill, yes, it will temporarily prop up the market, but for what, a few months? Then we will be worse off. And by giving this money to the rich people on Wall-street we will lose value to our dollar, because this money is just printed, it has no actual value, so it will know down the value we have to our dollar. A depression would at least make the value of a dollar worth more, it would be a little harder to get, but at least you could get more with it and it would compete with other currencies, but we are really making it fail by all this money printing. When the bill was denied the dollar went up a lot, but it will go down I am sure while this goes through. I am really worried though, I am going to Sweden and Spain in December, and I want to buy money ahead of time (cash), but if I buy it after this bill is passed I will be screwed, so I have to somehow jump and buy it now before I will lose a lot of money. Ugh, why can't we just be what we say we are, capitalist... What happened to Economic Darwinism? Why invest in stupid companies.
@xParanoiax (6987)
• United States
2 Oct 08
Gold and campbell's chicken noodle soup.
...hm? Oh, um...that's the only things going up in value right now. They're the only things likely to still have value if things continue to climb downwards.
Well, gold anyway. Campbell's is a company, it's only safe as long as people can still afford to buy soup.
@melvinandheather1 (540)
• United States
2 Oct 08
I don't really know whats going on it seems as though the most important assets of this people, being the American people, are kept out of the loop, it throws me in a whirl. What if the bill was passed, would I have seen a difference? How is going to affect me? I think that the main effect it would have on me and my family, is running us more in the hole. I can't afford any more taxes than i have already.
Why is it that everytime a major bill is passed or in the loop the most important factor is kept out. In my opinion, we grew too fast. Americans everywhere starting splurging their money on new homes, and new this and new that, and now we don't have enough money to tend to what we have bought. I could be way off track, but something made this happen, it's not the natural course. Great points.
@psspurgeon1 (1109)
• United States
2 Oct 08
I find it sickening that the salart for a bank member of any frickin bank was a 7 digit number. It makes me sick that all of these jerks that are trying to save their a** makes more than thousands of "average" americans combined yearly income. Maybe if these banks wouldn't pay all of their employees 6 and 7 figure incomes a year they could have saved their own a**es. You know, their main concern is probably the loss of their income when the majority of Americans could live the rest of their lives comfortably on one year of one of their salaries...
@melvinandheather1 (540)
• United States
4 Oct 08
Very true. We were put in this by mistake, yet we still have to pay for it, however, i think that in a way we helped out as well. Everyone got the feeling that money was easy to come by, therefore the building of more homes, with the thought of a secure line of work. However, when some of the lines of work became unsecure, and too many people were building homes, and taking now loans, and mortgages and such then the banks lent more then they could.
When that happened I think that the bank thought that they would be receiving the money back as usual, however, the jobs that were not secure led the people into foreclosure and the banks into higher rates, and those with a flexible rate mortgage then got hit with a great increase in their monthly payment, which in turn led to more foreclosures. I think that the system or the circle as I see it as, was put out of line. Basically I think we moved too fast, and got ahead of the game, and the government wasn't able to keep up with us. That's just my personal opinion though. Thanks for the responce.







