Abortion ban returns to ballot in South Dakota  |
| |
| The hot political potato of abortion is again being tossed about in South Dakota. If passed, it will be a nail in the coffin of Roe V. Wade. * This second South Dakota proposal is a bit watered down as compared to the first. Women may have abortions on reported cases of rape or incest, (many are unreported, which under this proposal, would leave many victims carrying fetuses) if the pregnancy is shown to endanger the life or health of the mother, and that is it. * Some doctors fear this proposed law will interfere with patient doctor relationships. Some medical procedures would have to be delayed until approved legally. This can make some painful decisions even more difficult. An example would be being forced by law to carry a fatally ill child to term who you know would have no quality of life. * People outside of South Dakota need to be aware of this as it could in future be proposed law in the state in which you live. * It does not matter if you personally feel abortion is right or wrong. This is about the government poking it's nose in the most intimate portion of a person's life. The government is becoming more intrusive in degrees. It is taking away our rights to make decisions. First, it will be about the abortion they want to ban. It could lead into bans on certain types of birth control women use to plan the size of their families. Later, it could be about banning the homeschooling of children. Where will it stop? | | Abortion ban returns to ballot in South Dakota | | | | |
| |
| | Ask a Lawyer: Child Law A Family Lawyer Will Answer Now! Child Law Answers Today: 87. Law.JustAnswer.com/Child
| 1 Tip to Lose Stomach Fat This unusual article shows 3 veggies that fight stomach fat. TruthAboutStomachFat.com
| Coffins Looking For Coffins? Find It Nearby With Local.com! Local.com
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
1. xfahctor (7620)
|
4 years ago
| | I first want to congradulate the state of South Dakota for standing up for it's rights as a state. You stated that this is about the government poking it's nose in area's it doesn't belong. I would agreee. It is about the federal government poking it's nose in to something that should have been a state issue and the state of South Dakota telling the federal government it's nose doen't belong in the issue. That Aside, we have the supreme court case Roe v Wade. This being law of the land, the state referendum in south Dakota would be nothing more than symbolic and would have no legal standing right now as long as the R v W decision is still on the books. It will however be a good barometer to indicate how the people of South Dakota feel about the issue. I guess we'll have to wait and see what the people have to say. | | | | | | |
CraftyCorner (2983)
|
4 years ago
| | You posed a point I did not consider. I agree that state sovereignty is a good idea as the Federal Government is getting more massive by the day. | | | |
| |
| Ask a Lawyer: Child Law A Family Lawyer Will Answer Now! Child Law Answers Today: 87. Law.JustAnswer.com/Child | add comment | | |
|
|
2. ElicBxn (24681)
|
4 years ago
| | This post contains content of a mature nature. You must be Signed in or Registered to have the option to view this content. | | | | | | |
CraftyCorner (2983)
|
4 years ago
| | This post contains content of a mature nature. You must be Signed in or Registered to have the option to view this content. | | | |
ElicBxn (24681)
|
4 years ago
| | There are a few ultra's but I doubt that will ever pass in a country that isn't dominately Roman Catholic. | | | |
CraftyCorner (2983)
|
4 years ago
| | Anti-birth control measures can be sneaked into law by unclear language on the ballots and by paying off politicians to get them to vote a certain way. This method has been used numerous times to get a measure that sane people would avoid passed. * | | | |
ElicBxn (24681)
|
4 years ago
| | It has also been used to get things that no sane taxpayer would want. And sometimes they pay no attention to what the voter and tax payer wants. We voted against light rail, but they got it anyway and voted agaist toll roads, but we got them anyway. Around here they also want to give money to business like Tiffanies to come to town - if business like that think setting up a store here is good, they don't need to be "bribed" to come to town. | | | |
CraftyCorner (2983)
|
4 years ago
| | Tiffany? Good grief, who can afford that...except the fat cat bankers that got us in a fiscal mess... | | | |
ElicBxn (24681)
|
4 years ago
| | Really, tho we do have a few people that can afford to get stuff | | | |
CraftyCorner (2983)
|
4 years ago
| | What concerns me is the fact that the fancy stores will be taking president over that which is usable by the community as a whole. Libraries come to my mind, as do playgrounds. | | | |
ElicBxn (24681)
|
4 years ago
| | That is so true. I voted against with prop, I'm SO tired of this city wasting our money on things we vote against! | | | |
| |
ElicBxn (24681)
|
4 years ago
| | I just try to vote for the lesser of the two weviels | | | |
CraftyCorner (2983)
|
4 years ago
| | Indeed. I don't like abortion either, but I fear many of the people within the 'pro life' movement. | | | |
ElicBxn (24681)
|
4 years ago
| | There is much more to fear from the "pro-choice" then the "pro-life." First its the unborn, then its the elderly, then its the disabled - anyone that can't speak for themselves. Pretty soon its the unwell, the overweight, the ugly and anyone else that has less power then they have.... | | | |
CraftyCorner (2983)
|
4 years ago
| | To some extent I agree with you. Yet something must be done for the population that is straining this planet beyond capacity. We are looking at nine billion before the end of this century. Bush is promoting this problem's continuation by denying the poorest access to birth control and promoting 'abstinence education' amongst them. After they marry, and often before, it is unrealistic for them to maintain abstinence. * Birth control must be taught everywhere so abortions and planetary death will not occur. Birth control must be both improved and made easily accessible. That is not happening in South Dakota as Planned Parenthood (a source of birth control for the poor more often than abortion) is ran out of town and pharmacists who disbelieve in birth control are now able to deny women such access. | | | |
ElicBxn (24681)
|
4 years ago
| | It is not unrealistic, I've done it just fine for all my 50 odd years. | | | |
CraftyCorner (2983)
|
4 years ago
| | The problem of obtaining birth control is most acute amongst the ultra poor, those living on $3 a day or less. * The situation has gotten so bad that a Congresswoman stepped in. * Recently, pharmacists with personal objections to birth control have imposed their beliefs on customers by refusing to fill perfectly legal birth control prescriptions and, in some cases, also refusing to return the prescription slip to the customers. * http://maloney.house.gov/... | | | |
ElicBxn (24681)
|
4 years ago
| | Now, that is wrong. I can see not filling the scrip, but returning it could be considered criminal. | | | |
CraftyCorner (2983)
|
4 years ago
| | They are doing it. And not returning the script so the woman can't turn to another pharmacist to get her script filled. Lot of people I know have had that happen to them. | | | |
ElicBxn (24681)
|
4 years ago
| | That could probably be considered stealing, as it doesn't belong to the pharmacy. Probably time to call the cops. | | | |
CraftyCorner (2983)
|
4 years ago
| | Tell me about it...then to add insult to injury by stating it was God's instruction to steal your slip. The fact it is mostly birth control meds that are being hit by this in some areas... | | | |
ElicBxn (24681)
|
4 years ago
| | see, I have less of a problem with control as abortion - although some of them are also dangerous drugs, especially things like the "morning after" pill | | | |
CraftyCorner (2983)
|
4 years ago
| | The morning after pill is not good I agree. It does have serious side effects on the body, as do some birth control tablets. Like I said, more research into birth control is needed to make the morning after pill less needed. | | | |
ElicBxn (24681)
|
4 years ago
| | This post contains content of a mature nature. You must be Signed in or Registered to have the option to view this content. | | | |
CraftyCorner (2983)
|
4 years ago
| | This post contains content of a mature nature. You must be Signed in or Registered to have the option to view this content. | | | |
ElicBxn (24681)
|
4 years ago
| | This post contains content of a mature nature. You must be Signed in or Registered to have the option to view this content. | | | |
CraftyCorner (2983)
|
4 years ago
| | This post contains content of a mature nature. You must be Signed in or Registered to have the option to view this content. | | | |
ElicBxn (24681)
|
4 years ago
| | This post contains content of a mature nature. You must be Signed in or Registered to have the option to view this content. | | | |
| |
| |
| 1 Tip to Lose Stomach Fat This unusual article shows 3 veggies that fight stomach fat. TruthAboutStomachFat.com | add comment | | |
|
|
3. piasabird (1583)
|
4 years ago
| | People are always talking about the woman's rights but when does a baby have rights? Even Roe in Roe V Wade feels that it was a mistake. I know of a woman who wanted a boy so every time she got pregnant she'd abort the baby if it was a girl. I know of a woman who has had two abortions, one when she was young and the second time both she and her 14 year old daughter were pregnant and had abortions! I commend S. Dakota for putting it on the ballot. | | | | | | |
CraftyCorner (2983)
|
4 years ago
| | I have concerns about the far right banning birth control which is the biggest stopper of abortions in this country. Quality birth control keeps conception from happening in the first place up to 99% of the time. Many ultraconservatives want to ban the ability of a woman to control family size. | | | |
| |
| Coffins Looking For Coffins? Find It Nearby With Local.com! Local.com | add comment | | |
|
|
| |
CraftyCorner (2983)
|
4 years ago
| | That is so...provided this vote doesn't bring forth repercussions within other states. * (BTW, that is a pretty cat.) | | | |
TheCatLady (2753)
|
4 years ago
| | Well then to another country. If I had gotten pregnant when I was young, I wouldn't have wanted to tell my folks because it's non of their business. But if I had to ask, they would have paid for a flight to Canada or Europe or anywhere else in the world for an abortion. That's were the banning abortion laws are unfair and won't work. People with money,(or supportive parents with money) can always get a safe abortion. The safest legal abortions pre Rowe V Wade were in Japan. Imagine the costs of going to Japan in the 60's. The poor will have fewer options. It's not just the flight or the cost of the abortion. There's the time off from work or school, hotel costs, taxi's in a strange area, eating in restaurants for several days. It adds up to a lot of money. Thanks about my kitty. That's Frankie. He's a great cat. | | | |
CraftyCorner (2983)
|
4 years ago
| | That is an excellent point that needs to be loudly expressed. More birth control means less abortions too. | | | |
| |
| Try Bentler's EQS program Easy visual Structural Equations, CFA, Path, Growth, Multilevel models www.mvsoft.com | add comment | | |
|
|
| | Try Bentler's EQS program Easy visual Structural Equations, CFA, Path, Growth, Multilevel models www.mvsoft.com
| 5 Foods to never eat Cut down a bit of your belly every day by not eating these 5 foods. Truthaboutabs.com
| Local Coupons 1 ridiculously huge coupon a day. Save 50-90% on your city's best! www.Groupon.com
|
|
| |
| |
| |