Iran said to have enough nuclear fuel for weapon
By jfxrsch
@jfxrsch (1040)
China
December 7, 2008 2:53am CST
According to experts analyzing the last reports from global automic inspectors, Iran now produced enough materials to make a nuclear bomb.
Irans said it's only for furling reactors for nuclear power. But, as we can imagine, the rest of the world is thinking of bomb. Especial, the U.S. is making big voice trying to stop Iran.
Google it, you can read the full story on any newspaper.
My question is: why some country can have nuclear fuel while others can't have it?
I know, some countries look more like a bad guy, some countries look more like a good guy. But how can you be so sure that a good guy wouldn't make a bomb to destroy another country? how can you be so sure that a bad guy will definitely make a bomb for killing?
It's just not a fair situation. What's your true opinion?
3 responses
@murderistic (2278)
• United States
8 Dec 08
If Iran makes a nuclear weapon, which is doubtful with all the people watching their every move with a magnifying glass, I highly doubt they will use it. Because they should know by now that if they do, they will get nuked in return. Unless they manage to nuke the entire US, UK, Israel... which isn't going to happen. I say let them have one nuclear weapon, they should have the right to protect themselves, they are a sovereign nation, aren't they? By not allowing them to have a nuclear weapon they are left feeling quite vulnerable to attack (which is exactly how the rest of the world likes it lol but as I said, they are a sovereign nation). It's understandable that they want a nuclear weapon. I really don't think that they would use it unless they were justified in doing so, because as I said, they wouldn't stand a chance to the rest of the nukes in the world.
@xfahctor (14113)
• Lancaster, New Hampshire
7 Dec 08
I think it is probably inevitable that this kind of thing will continue. As technology progresses, we can expect more nations with such ambitions to develop this technology. The only real barricaid to a nuclear weapon, is the material. The rest is perportedly available technology. While I don't fear Iran being stupid enough to actualy launch a nuclear weapon, I do believe there are elements in the Iranian government that wouldn't hesitate to give such a weapon to a group to use, either in Isreal or here in the U.S.
To try and eliminate nuclear weapons from the planet, though a nice idea, is virtualy impossible, the cork is out of the bottle. What needs to happen is for the technology to be developed that disables the chain reaction that occures in a detonation, rendering such weapons virtualy inoperable.
@jfxrsch (1040)
• China
8 Dec 08
very well said! I also would add on-- It's not nice for countries bothering each other on what should the others do or not do.
Too much money has spend on their arguments. If only they spend half of that amount in other ways, our life should have been greatly improved.
@shay3434 (881)
• Israel
21 Mar 09
Hey!
It maybe sounds not fair that some countries can have a nuclear weapon whiwle other countries can't. A nuclear weapon is not good for everyone and I wish all countries won't use it nevr because it can only cause bad things.
But there are some countries that if they have this nuke ability the world will be much less safe.
Iran's leader Mahmud Ahmadinejad has already said that "Israel should be beet of the map" and the west is concerned that if Iran have this nuclear weapon, the will use it against Israel or maybe against other countries that supports Israel.
If Iran has nuclear weapon, the world will be much more dangerous.
