Regardless of the Ability to Pay

@ParaTed2k (22940)
Sheboygan, Wisconsin
June 1, 2009 3:12pm CST
In US, We the People demand our rights to "Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness". Our Constitution establishes a government and defines the roles of the people working in it. Along the way many seem to have decided that there is no life, liberty or happiness without entitlements. The entitlements are meant to be based on "need", but in demanding entitlements for the needy, haven't we defined what needs are more important than others... but more dangerous... whose needs are more important than others? We have taxpayer funded programs that provide food, health care, transportation, heating/power/water assistance and all sorts of other things for the "needy". However but don't we all "need" food, health care, transportation, heating/power and water? Sure, some people can afford food better than others, since when do we base Constitutional Rights on the ability to pay? Where does it say, "Life, Liberty & the pursuit of happiness to those who can't afford them... the rest of you can fend for yourself". Why are the "needy" entitled to anything not freely available to all in the first place? I can see why buildings and property open to the public should be made accessible to all, but for all our talk... is it? Wheelchair ramps, braille signs, audible instructions and warnings make access available to the crippled, blind and deaf. Pictographs help the illiterate or foreign laguage speakers, and benches help the elderly or otherwise weakened among us... regardless of the ability to pay. But even in our quest for equal access, we discriminate pretty openly. People who need glasses don't have any easier time reading without glasses than the blind, illiterate or foreign speakers, yet do we furnish them with glasses? Those pictographs were meant to help people who can't read, but then we go and color code things, without regard to the "colorblind"... in fact, colorblindness isn't even a conditioned worthy of "equal access". We are not only left to fend for ourselves, but if we cause an accident, it is OUR FAULT. Our rights are ours, regardless of ability to pay, but apparently some people have more access to those rights than those with the ability to pay.
1 response
@Adoniah (7512)
• United States
1 Jun 09
Interesting topic. There have ben some concessions to the colorblind you know. Why do you think all traffic lights are exactly the same? They didn't used to be. They were made the way they are today simply BECAUSE of color blind people. That way they would always know when the light was red. I cannot think of another instance where the lack of ability to distinguish color would cause an accident. I am sorry if I am obtuse. I have even noticed that a lot of stores group clothing by color to make it easier to match items. I think that that is a good idea and very helpful. You are right about the color coding. They should stick to colors that are clear to color blind folks. That is something that should be changed. Shalom~Adoniah