"Terrorism can b eliminated only by use of sheer military force rather than...."
By btamanna
@btamanna (220)
India
July 4, 2009 1:25pm CST
FOR
1. Conciliatory measures have failed to curb the increase of terrorism as the terrorists are motivated by harrow and perverted ideologies, which are not amenable to reason. Therefore, use of force is the only way to curb terrorism.
Against
2. Political solution would alone be the lasting solution, and the use of force would only temporarily solve the problem. Even though suppressed for a while, terrorism would crop up again as the terrorists are mostly unemployed, frustrated youth, who are very much committed to the redressal of their grievances.
What do you think about how terrorism can be eliminated???
2 responses
@tonyllenium (6251)
• Italy
4 Jul 09
I think government shoudl fight terrorism considering it not as in the past such as small located group of people that projects conspiration or teroristic attempt due to different roots ideologies or practical so now the terorism should be quite global and so it should take different measures thn in the past!!i think to invade a country this is a real old fashioned tactics because it would not defeate at all all cells and organization as well..may be a strong international cooperation and good action from different intelligence can be a solution and also trying to fight from also an ideological point o view the basis of terror ideologies can eb suitable too seeeing that many organization starts from an ideological or religious poin of view and so not just strategic or military ones!!
