Do you believe with the history of Adam & Eve?

There are no fossils of humans that are gradually standing upright. Go read about fossils. I have. What you are conjuring, does not exists. Adaptation and evolution are not the same. Not by any stretch. Adaption is built into the DNA of an animal. It is part of their genetic design to allow them to adapt. But in every single instance of adaptation, a fly, a squirrel, or a iguana that adapts to its environment, is still exactly what it always was, a fly, a squirrel, or a iguana. All of them do so within the abilities of their DNA, which has not changed. Mantis- I noticed that you failed to present any evidence, or scientific basis for your statements. As such, I have determined that you have more of a 'faith' basis for your unscientific beliefs than do I. Fools resort to insults and ridicule when they have no science to make their claims by. Allow me to cite some educational resources to you both, since neither of you seem to know much. These are things you can look up on your own, to verify for yourself the validity of the claims. In order to be more informed, I would suggest you do this. --------------------------------------------------- “Contrary to what most scientists write, the fossil record does not support the Darwinian theory of evolution because it is this theory (there are several) which we use to interpret the fossil record. By doing so, we are guilty of circular reasoning if we then say the fossil record supports this theory." - Ronald R. West “Paleontology and Uniformitariansim.” Compass, Vol. 45 (May 1968), p. 216.] --------------------------------------------------- “Established species are evolving so slowly that major transitions between genera and higher taxa must be occurring within small rapidly evolving populations that leave no legible fossil record.” - Steven M. Stanley 'Macroevolution and the Fossil Record' Vol. 36, No. 3, 1986, p. 460. (emphasis added) --------------------------------------------------- "...Every paleontologist knows that most new species, genera, and families, and that nearly all categories above the level of family appear in the record suddenly and are not led up to by known, gradual, completely continuous transitional sequences.” - George Gaylord Simpson 'The Major Features of Evolution' New York, Columbia University Press, 1953 p. 360. --------------------------------------------------- “Few paleontologists have, I think, ever supposed that fossils, by themselves, provide grounds for the conclusion that evolution has occurred. The fossil record doesn’t even provide any evidence in support of Darwinian theory except in the weak sense that the fossil record is compatible with it, just as it is compatible with other evolutionary theories, and revolutionary theories, and special creationist theories, and even ahistorical theories.” - David B. Kitts "Search for the Holy Transformation," Paleobiology, Vol. 5 (Summer 1979), pp. 353-354. --------------------------------------------------- And I could provide dozens more from world renowned evolutionists, and paleontologists that all say exactly the same. There is no evidence, none whatsoever, in the fossil record that directly supports evolution. Only that it is comparable, just as it is compatible with dozens of other theories, including special creation. Now the question is, what will you do with this information? Ignorantly deny that the science doesn't support evolutionary myths? Or accept the fact that what you have called science for so long, is really nothing more than pseudo-faith based belief system?

he doesn't visit his nearest museum in order for him to find out the massive evidences about the prehistoric fossils of the remains of the pasts as a solid evidences..... what only have he got is a "word of mouth came from those 40 unschooled men who wrote the bible", that when heard of thunder, they immediately kneel down and pray in order for the Lord not to angry.... God show him the proof of evolution, God show him the the things evolved... God he doesn't believe in God's mysterious ways of designs...

What do you mean that they have yet to find an example? What about the fossils of humans that is gradually standing upright? And other fossils indicating the change in the animals to adapt to their certain environments.

there are already plenty of people living in the 7 continents before the birth of Adam and Eve, that is the nearest answer if you combine God and Science.... and the children's of Adam and Eve naturally will marry those people living in the other cities thus CROSSBREEDING is really happens... no such thing as INBREEDING because it only produce retarded growth.... not all but a 40% to 60% possibilities of the defected offspring....

That what I'm trying to point out. The Bible has many inaccuracies. You can't really combine God and Science when certain variables don't match, i.e. time. Bible said that God created Adam and Eve but the Bible didn't mention any other human creations by God after that.

it is because those 40 men who wrote the content of that bible doesn't even goes to school... when God said that the earth is already 4 billion years old, they interpret it as 4 thousand years.... meaning, MISINTERPRETATION is the leading cause of that 40 men (their errors) while writing the bible.... for example: a house is not a home... but a home is a house.... for example: if God said: i will give you 3 houses.... those 40 men misinterpret: Yes!!! at last, God give me 3 homes, meaning, God give us 3 kingdom as what others interpret for the 2nd error.... conclusion: house is different to compare with home home is another different to compare it with kingdom therefore: when God said i give you 3 houses... the present people as of now misinterpreted as God give us 3 kingdom of ours.... and those who shall not believe it is a "BLASPHEMY" because this is guided by the Holy Spirit, and those Holy Spirit never edited those misinterpretation issues.... what we have now is a chain of inheritant errors or misinterpretations.....

That is something I would not have a clue on.

Im trying to understand free thinker,when they rely only thru science for all explanation to believe and something are unexplainable yet, how can they deny history? When they can't deny history and all the proof that support the history facts how come they deny the story of how Adam & Eve was created..

i think the subject HISTORY is also under SCIENCE... all of the subjects learned in school are all contains SCIENCE.... even religion itself contains SCIENCE.... there is no doubt, SCIENCE and GOD is just one compatible, it doesn't make conflict... our mind and our interpretations make it conflict....

Thank you for the correction.

i have some sort of corrections: when you say "monkey" meaning, an animal who belongs to the modern year/world that we lived in... meaning.... monkey and us(humans) are both belong to the modern world that we lived in now.... meaning... humans, Adam and Eve, monkey, apes = there are all came from PREHISTORIC APE-LIKE mammal creatures.... for example: Australopithecus, an Ape-like appearance from which monkeys and humans came from...

Do you mean the story that they ate the forbidden fruits is a made off or just a myth?

about forbidden fruits? maybe it's a 75 percent MYTH.... or the remaining... 25 percent is the MISINTERPRETATION of not really a fruit but maybe something else resemblance to not following the SLAVE within it's MASTER... try not to put some blasphemy think, try to analyze something... it is easy to invent parables, myth, tales, legends, whatever, especially if the moral lessons and the content is more convincing to all of the leading other religions beliefs.... unless, no scientific solid form of evidence to support such claims, it will only remains as "subject to be proven" yet, it may only take an example of guidance, in order for the man to do good, to do good to others, and to think several times before committing any sins, the content of the parables, verses, and chapters... and it so happened that the great expeditions and conqueror of all times are the Spanish and Rome and they always carry Christian Religions as an exchange for the gold and wealth and slave of the nations invaded..... For example: here in our Country the Philippines, if not for Magellan(a Christian) killed by Philippine Hero Lapu-Lapu(Muslim)... the island of the Philippines is a Muslim Country just like majority of the Asian Countries.... Truly only Philippines remains as a majority Roman Catholic Country in Asia and never accept Divorce to be legal because Roman Catholics always do hold and disturb the government plan of Divorce to be legalized...