Do you think smoking should be banned everywhere?

it must.

It should not be banned much of the taxes come from cigar companies to the govt it is used for good purposes

It is very difficult to banne.

I do not smoke, and I have never smoked. I hate smoking. Still, it seems very unfair to say people can't smoke anywhere except in their homes. Very rarely (truly, I can't remember a time ever) have I really been bothered by secondhand smoke outside. Most people are very polite about not inflicting their smoke on others. I have, however, witnessed several times when non-smokers have verbally assaulted smokers who weren't even in range of the said non-smoker, just because they don't like to see people smoking. I have also seen several times when smokers going into the smoking room at work have been harrassed by the non-smokers to not go in that room. I say, "Mind your own business!"

not everywhere only public places it should b banned coz smoking is injurious not only for smoker but for others also....

any where will not banned on smoking, government achieve much economy from these.

yes, send hand smoke is also a important cause and will cause lung cancer in women. such as the adenocarcinoma lung cancer, it is the lung cancer of women who are nonsmokers but suffer from second hand smoke or cooking smoke.

yes i think smokeing should be banned every where

I myself am a non smoker however I am against banning smoking. I don't want to see that happen because then non-drinkers will want to ban drinking. It boils down to everyone losing freedom of choices. I would rather see them increase the taxes on the cost of cigarettes and hopefully the smoker will not want to pay the cost and deceide to quit for themselves. Why to many do-gooders trying to take away other peoples personal rights. People need to MYOB!