Sarah Palin ABUSED HER POWER In Firing!

@anniepa (27955)
United States
October 10, 2008 7:51pm CST
This news is just in; Governor Sarah Palin abused her power in the firing of her state public safety commissioner, Walter Monegan. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27105917/ Does anyone have any thoughts on this development? Do you believe Palin's credibility has been damaged, especially considering she's been the one who has been on the campaign stump trying to convince voters Obama isn't trustworthy? Does anyone here think this will result in her being dropped from the ticket? What effect, if any, do you think this will have on the November 4 Presidential Election? Personally, I think they were already pretty much toast, but this served to burn them to a crisp! Annie
2 people like this
16 responses
• United States
11 Oct 08
I think we all knew that something wasn't right with this, and I guess we all know now that we are right. This goes back to the question of who vetted her, and what side were they on? You have to think about who would bennifit from McCain losing this election (I am sure that conservatives, and everyone that was running for president in the republican party wouldn't mind seeing McCain's campaign go down in flames). This doesn't surprise me at all.
3 people like this
• United States
11 Oct 08
What would be nice to come out of this is for it to have totally destroyed any chance for her to run for the presidency in the future - and I've seen a lot of 'McCain 2008/Palin 2012' sigs on the right-wing news sites.
2 people like this
@mcat19 (1357)
• United States
11 Oct 08
This does not surprise me. It's too late for McCain to remove her from the ticket. They just love her anyway. It doesn't look like it can hurt them anymore than they are hurt already. Check out the polls. The more negative he is, the more he stirs up hatred, the lower go his numbers. McCain is such a disappointment; he used to be an honorable guy. Palin was always a loose cannon.
@stephcjh (38473)
• United States
11 Oct 08
I think Palin's credibility has been damaged for quite some time now. I'm not sure how it will effect her votes. I know alot of people will vote for the Republican party no matter what.
2 people like this
@xfahctor (14118)
• Lancaster, New Hampshire
11 Oct 08
*gasp *smacks hands on face* *shock /sarcasm Well, imagine that, this "bipartisan" investigative body found she abused power. /sarcasm Can ANYONE honestly look me in the face and say they didn't expect this to be the outcome? Seriously? Ok, and this changed what for who? Anyone who was voting for McCain will probably still vote for McCain, anyone who wasn going to vote for Obama, will still vote for Obama. Now that we got that out of the way, can we get back to that pesky economic glitch? Or back to the fact that a multi-trillion dollar, GINORMOUS, unconstitutional, power grab was just made and that BOTH those candidates have made filthy their hands with? My FRIKKIN GOD people. Your all STILL really going to quibble and bicker over the same trivial dribble and then vote the same again, aren't you.
3 people like this
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
11 Oct 08
I agree with those who have posted that the die hard McCain supporters won't have a problem with this but I can't imagine that all those independent voters are looking the other way. Some folks take abuse of power seriously, especially when it comes to someone who could one day be sitting in the big chair in the Oval office. John McCain made a very poor choice in a running mate.
3 people like this
@ZephyrSun (7381)
• United States
11 Oct 08
I know that so many die harders will not give a crap but I think it speaks volumes to independents and undecided voters. We do not need another person in this high office that believes they are above the law, they are not. They need to do the job that is requirered of them and not break the law. If we want to complain that these people we elect to represent us are not suited for the position then we need to stop electing them. I hope my post makes some sort of sense, I've been taking cold medicine tonight and usually my fingers work slower than my brain when I do.
2 people like this
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
12 Oct 08
Actually Elaan, Obama first attacked McCain over his history with the Keating 5 in May. He didn't wait till now to bring it up.
@ZephyrSun (7381)
• United States
13 Oct 08
LOL Terry I do not consider you a die hard, you have a heart. I really hope you are doing well.
@ElaanR2 (277)
• United States
12 Oct 08
The fact of the matter is where did it all start? You can't call Obama divisive when it was Sarah Palin who decided to talk about affiliations. Now, talking about affiliations, do you know Keating? Do you know Rick Davis? And do you know John Singlaub? These are John McCain's affiliations too. But, did you hear of them before Sarah Palin talked about Ayers? You didn't because Obama did not think those affiliations are the ones who will run when a candidate wins. If it shows bad judgment, then McCain's affiliation to John Singlaub's activities are more damning than Obama's affiliation to Ayers. When Ayers was doing his 'terrorist' stuff, Obama was eight years. When Singlaub was doing his 'terrorist' stuff, McCain's name was on the letterhead of his group.
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
11 Oct 08
Well, their decision seems to be based on their opinions rather than fact. First, they deemed that she was within her rights to fire Monegan and that act was NOT an abuse of power. The supposed abuse of power was in allowing her husband to pressure Monegan to fire State Trooper Wooten. "Branchflower said Palin violated a statute of the Alaska Executive Branch Ethics Act. "I disagree," said Palin attorney Thomas Van Flein. "In order to violate the ethics law, there has to be some personal gain, usually financial. Mr. Branchflower has failed to identify any financial gain." The statute says "any effort to benefit a personal or financial interest through official action is a violation of that (public) trust."" Well, she clearly didn't benefit a financial interest and the personal interest was in trying to remove a criminal from the state troopers. Last time I checked removing rogue officers was in the PUBLIC interest, not just the governor's personal interest. It's their OPINION that having him fired was merely a personal interest. Hollis French had his mind made up before this even started so I think we all knew what they'd decide.
1 person likes this
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
11 Oct 08
It's not about punishment, although I'm amazed you think a 6 day suspension is adequate for tasering a 10 year old, drinking in a police car, shooting a moose without a permit, and threatening his ex-wife's family. If returning him to duty is "rightly so" in your opinion than I'd hate to have you running the police force in my town. Drinking and driving on the job makes him a danger to THE PUBLIC. Tasering a child as a training exercise makes him DANGEROUS TO EVERYONE while he's carrying a weapon. "Also, has everyone forgotten it wasn't the trooper that got fired but the Safety Commissioner? " She did not abuse her power in firing the commissioner Annie. Didn't you read the article? "Sarah Palin unlawfully abused her power as governor by trying to have her former brother-in-law fired as a state trooper, the chief investigator of an Alaska legislative panel concluded Friday." http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27105917/ That's YOUR source, and it's from MSNBC, the most anti-McCain news outlet on television. Here's another source to show you why Monegan isn't the issue anymore. "Public Safety Commissioner Walt Monegan's refusal to fire State Trooper Mike Wooten from the state police force was "likely a contributing factor" to Monegan's July dismissal, but Palin had the authority as governor to fire him, the report by former Anchorage prosecutor Stephen Branchflower states." "Stapleton called the investigation "a partisan-led inquiry" run by supporters of Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama, but hailed its finding that Monegan's firing broke no law. "Gov. Palin was cleared of the allegation of an improper firing, which is what this investigation was approved to look into," she said." http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/10/palin.investigation/index.html
2 people like this
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
11 Oct 08
How many times should that trooper be punished for the same acts? Isn't there a justice system in this country and employer guidelines? The trooper was punished and was returned to duty...and rightly so. Do you have any evidence that this trooper was a danger to the PUBLIC? This was a personal matter. Palin was angry at the trooper for personal reasons and she abused her power in an attempt to gain the personal satisfaction of having him fired.
1 person likes this
@piasabird (1737)
• United States
11 Oct 08
BURN HER AT THE STAKE! Good grief we've got some real losers running for office this year! Geez, and I had so much hope in her.
1 person likes this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
12 Oct 08
Wow, I wouldn't go THAT far, but maybe her witch hunter preacher friend would...lol! Annie
• United States
11 Oct 08
"Monegan's firing was lawful, the report found...." "...it was not the sole reason Monegan was dismissed." I read in another story that he was in trouble before Palin was even elected. "I feel vindicated," Monegan said." Sounds like someone with a grudge. This was a $100,000, 8 week, 300 page waste of taxpayers time and money. "Democrat Hollis French,[an Obama Supporter] who oversaw the investigation, predicted an "October surprise".... IOW He made sure it was wrapped up Before the election. Would it be nice if the investigation into Obama's $800,000 "Clerical error" Got his kind of attention? LOL What investigation? "The Palins said they feared for their family's safety after Wooten made threats against them." This means Nothing???? This whole issue is just more fuel for the left's hate. Barely worth a single molehill.
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
11 Oct 08
It was a Democratic Congressman's son, not a Senator, as I understand, he was indicted and he plead not guilty. Let's see what happens from there. If he is guilty he certainly should be punished, I'm not arguing that. Annie
• United States
11 Oct 08
Moonlite, I still ask why was it OK for Hillary to be involved up to her neck in the President's business when BJ was President, But you are getting all hot and bothered about Todd getting some emails cc'd to him? But when it comes to Obama and voter fraud you're like "meh, Maybe he will be investigated"? Yeah right. And annie, Senator, Congressman, either way that POS is not going to see a day behind bars. This is what that guy at that rally is so Mad about. And he's not alone. Republicans get pounced on and dragged through the mud and gravel for the slightest misconduct While Democrats get away with Bloody Murder. I go again back to Mark Foley. He was Smeared for two whole weeks and later cleared of all wrongdoing. Meanwhile the Democrats take over the country and drive it into the ground. At the same time William Jefferson(D-LA) is still sitting PHAT in his office with an indictment for taking $4MILLION in BRIBES. And he is RE ELECTED!!!!! When it comes to Obama you guys keep Whining about "Attacks" on his "Character", But what is this? Is this not an attack on Sarah Palin's Character? No law was Broken. But a partisan chairman who is an Obama supporter MADE DAMN SURE this was released BEFORE Election Day. And Believe me it's not the Democrats that we are MAD at. It's our own Party that are sitting on their hands and letting it happen because they are afraid to be called Politically Incorrect. Can You Say Witch Hunt? http://townhall.com/columnists/MichelleMalkin/2008/10/10/the_obama_witch_project?page=full&comments=true
• United States
11 Oct 08
Two words. Hillary Clinton. I'm not going to sit here and say that Sarah is perfect. If that really is what happened, No he shouldn't have been receiving those emails. I also don't think a Democrat Senators son should have hacked into her email account looking for dirt. He needs to serve time for that. But since he is a senators son he probably won't. I also think someone should be investigating Barack Hussein Obama's $800,000 "Clerical Error" to a group that he once represented in court against Citigroup to force them to make bad loans and is now charged with Voter fraud in 15 states and counting. Don'cha think THAT's a bigger issue?
• United States
11 Oct 08
My feas increase -- she could end up our president if some of these anti-humane right wingers have their way!
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
11 Oct 08
My fears increase as well. Remember, the worst thing the D1ck Cheney did, according to Sarah, was shoot that guy in the face. It looks like she admires people who consider themselves above the law. Annie
1 person likes this
• United States
11 Oct 08
They not only seem to consider themselves above the law; they think they're so much better than the rest of us. This country is the land of equality, and giving that concept up destroys so many of our population!
1 person likes this
@irishidid (8688)
• United States
11 Oct 08
The amount of skeletons in all the candidates closets, this is small stuff in comparison. As far as being trustworthy, since when was any politician?
1 person likes this
@philjas (1134)
• United States
11 Oct 08
What I'd like to know is if the reports that the brother-in-law threatened and physically abused members of the Palin family (including a child) have been proven. If they HAVE, it's hard to blame Gov. Palin for what she did - but at the same time it's hard to believe the man is still working and no further action has been taken against him. So that's my question, were those accusations of threats and physical abuse ever proven?
1 person likes this
• United States
11 Oct 08
I saw him admit on an interview to some of these things but the one that really caught my attention was tazering the child. He used the lame excuse "he wanted me to".
1 person likes this
• United States
11 Oct 08
You know I only ever heard that he tasered his stepson. I didn't know that he was a 10 year old kid.
• United States
11 Oct 08
In fairness, the report also stated that the firing was "procedurally correct" and that she had the right to fire Monegan, and that her personal feud with her brother-in-law was only one factor in her decision to fire him. Officially, she was found to have 'unlawfully abused the trust of her office' by allowing her personal life to interfere in her governing. I seriously doubt that they'll drop her from the ticket. They'll push the fact that the firing was upheld as being procedurally correct, and continue stating that politics tainted the process, and that they went in with a predetermined outcome in mind.
@PrarieStyle (2486)
• United States
11 Oct 08
You failed to mention that no charges will be brought against her. Even Larry King reported that part and he's clearly backing Senator Obama. She didn't break any laws. I wonder if Obama will be dropped from the ticket because of his association with Acorn?
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
11 Oct 08
PrairieStyle, you don't have to worry about your star rating on my account, I can tell you that much, unless you curse at me or threaten to PUT a curse on me...lol! Someone doesn't have to agree with me to get rated positive. I know there are some on both sides of the political aisle who don't feel that way, but I'm not one of them. Annie
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
11 Oct 08
Association with Acorn? Are you somehow implying that it's suspicious for him to give $800,000 to an organization that promotes voter fraud? You must be a racist! [/sarcasm]
1 person likes this
• United States
11 Oct 08
Hey, I know sarcasm when I see it, see my star? Watch it go lower now that I'm on this topic.
1 person likes this
@Rozie37 (15499)
• Turkmenistan
12 Oct 08
I have to say that what she did was wrong, very wrong. I feel really bad for the commissioner who got fired for doing the right thing. He is definitely owed something. As far as Palin, nothing surprises me about her. What broke my heart though, was seeing the poor defenseless animal that she had killed just for sport. I do not like it when men do that, but somehow, it is much worse when a woman does it. Call me old-fashioned or whatever you choose, but it is not ladylike. Not only that, it is a contradiction. How could she be pro-life and then kill an animal for no reason. Not only that, she had her daughter right there with her. I just don't get it.
@wa2nlinux (179)
• Indonesia
11 Oct 08
Yes .. now swe can cal her as fallin LOL