extreme capitalism is not about justice or freedom

@jb78000 (15139)
December 9, 2010 8:41am CST
sorry to break the bubble but not everybody has an equal chance of success. people tolerate the excesses of capitalism because they think it means hard work is rewarded and everybody has the opportunity to get a really big chunk of the pie. nope. if this were the case then a sweatshop worker would have as much chance ending up the ceo of nike as the previous ceo's child, since they work harder than everybody further up the ladder. even within one country this 'hard work leads to success' myth is not true, and in very class stratified societies (like the united states) even less true. this is my christmas present to the politics section. thought you'd like it.
4 people like this
19 responses
• United States
9 Dec 10
It is not just about working hard...it is about working smart too. If someone wants a better life than they have...yes it takes hard work. But it takes working smarter too. People need to sit down and decide what they want from life and what they want to do. Then they need a plan (write out all the steps) on how they are going to reach those goals.What they need to do. Then they need to stick with that plan and do it. Yes it is going to take a lot of hard work and sacrifice to do it but it can be done. Yes it may take longer for the poor kid than the rich kid. But it can be done. Yes a CEOs kid has a better CHANCE at a good life. They have advantages the sweat shop workers kid doesn't. But if that CEO's kid does not apply him or herself then it won't do him or her very much good will it? I know plenty of rich kids that failed in the "real world" when they grew up because they lacked ambition and drive. Yes the sweat shop workers kid will have to work harder to get a better life.Over come more and really apply themselve. But it can be done. Both of those kids will need focus, self discipline, drive and ambition to get what they want. No there is not a "level playing field" in this country. Life is not fair. Some will have it easier than others.The ones that have it easier is because their parents did what it too to make sure their kids would have it easier. But that does not stop people from succeeding. It all comes down to knowing what you want and doing what it takes it get it. Look at most rich people...how did they get that way? Most of them are very ambitious and go getters. They knew what they wanted and they went after it until they got it. If they got knocked on their butts by life they got back up and keep going. They did not give up or give in.They made sacrifices. They had self discipline. They did not wait for someone to hand them what they wanted..they went out and got it. They did not spend time talking about how "unfair" it was that someone has it easier than them. Or complian about how hard it was going to be to get what they wanted. They realistically looked at the situation, saw what it would take for them to get what they wnated...and then they went out and did it. I still believe with enough ambition, determination, drive, and self discipline ANYTHING is possible. But it is a matter of having all those things. Some people have it...some people don't.
2 people like this
• United States
9 Dec 10
If you are talking about other countries. yeah I see your point. A sweat shop workers kids in China has little chance of improving themselves. There is not that much opportunity for them no matter how bright or ambitious they are. Why do you think so many people from all over the world want to come to America? But here in America it is different. Just look in the white house. Obama grew up very poor. He had a lot of things going against him. Look where he is now. You could call him a success BEFORE he ever was elected to any public office. Why? He will be the first to tell you he worked his butt off to get where he is today. He had the drive and determination to have a better life. He had the self discipline it took to get what he wanted. We have a number of politicans that grew up poor and now are rich. Ever seen the story of Liz Murrey? She went from being a homeless teen to going to Harvard and having a good life. This country is full of rags to richces stories. Look at the all mighty Oprah.. she grew up very poor and now look at her. A lot of the super rich in this country grew up poor. A lot of the CEOs we love to hate grew up poor. What makes them so different from the ones who didn't? Their drive, determination and ambition. You know that in some cities the high school drop out rate is almost 50%. The ones that drop out will not be able to move up the economic ladder. Education is key to a better life. They are by their own decisions dooming themselves to a harder life. They lacked the self discipline to finish school. They lacked the ambition to want more from life and go after it. Could our schools be doing a better job...oh god yes. But you could put the best teachers in the world in those schools...but if the kids don't want to learn they won't. You can lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink. Oprah was asked why she opened a school in Africa instead of helping the schools here in America. YOu know what she said? Because when she asked the kids in some the worst schools in this country what they wanted they said Ipod, sneakers, toys and other material things. None of them asked for books, paper, pencils, a better education, tutors or help getting into college. She got so fustrated with it that she decided to go to Africa because those kids were asking for a better education. When 50% of the inner city school kids don't get even a basic education of course they are not going to move up the ladder...which is going to show in the statics that less are moving up which then makes it look like less can move up. When in fact in most cases (not all) it was poor decision making skills and a lack of ambition that has caused them to stay low on the economic ladder. We will have to agree to disagree on this one. I don't think it is a lack of opportunity but a lack of taking advantage of thoes opportunities that is the problem.
1 person likes this
@jb78000 (15139)
9 Dec 10
so these inner city kids somehow are genetically lacking in ambition, determination and drive as opposed to those born to upper middle class families? - which is what the simplistic view that people are poor through their own lack of drive means. newsflash - they aren't. and finding 0.00001% that did manage to get to the top from the bottom doesn't change that. this is what the upperclass in victorian britain thought - to excuse to themselves an obviously unequal society. it was then, and is now, complete nonsense.
@jb78000 (15139)
9 Dec 10
the sweat shop workers kid will have to work harder to get a better life.Over come more and really apply themselve. But it can be done. snowball's chance in hell lil - sorry. the chance of a sweatshop worker or their child ever becoming even moderately successful is so small it is practically zero, no matter how hard they work and how smart they are. i know you'd like to believe that hard work will be rewarded but this is not how the world works, and unfettered capitalism is not fair. i am not saying that you shouldn't be rewarded for what you do but there should be restraints. one billion people not getting enough to eat even though there is enough food, primarily due to economics suggests to me something is wrong. when children starve in the name of abstract ideas that suggests these abstract ideas need rethinking. I still believe with enough ambition, determination, drive, and self discipline ANYTHING is possible. But it is a matter of having all those things. Some people have it...some people don't. you can believe this all you want, but for the vast majority of people, even, or especially in your country, it is simply not true.
1 person likes this
@dawnald (85135)
• Shingle Springs, California
9 Dec 10
Class stratified societies? Now that goes against everything they have taught us in history class...
1 person likes this
@dawnald (85135)
• Shingle Springs, California
9 Dec 10
Were they annoyed?
1 person likes this
@jb78000 (15139)
9 Dec 10
found out in a sociology class twelve years ago that the stereotypes americans have about relative social mobility in the uk and us is exactly the opposite of what is really the case. even more so if you compare mainland europe to the us. it hasn't changed - in fact it is more extreme now. went to get a source to annoy somebody a couple of days ago. http://www.economist.com/node/15908469
2 people like this
@jb78000 (15139)
9 Dec 10
probably . added something about the economist being too liberal and then disappeared.
1 person likes this
@djbtol (5493)
• United States
9 Dec 10
There is a difference between having equal opportunity and obtaining the goal. Equal opportunity means that someone has not established a system that holds me back and prevents me from success. A hypothetical example would be if there was a law that said a black person can never have more than $1000 in the bank. Freedom, combined with capitalism says that the black person (man or woman) has just as much opportunity and freedom to find a way to make a million dollars and be CEO. There is no guarantee he will be successful in that pursuit. Capitalism should not be confused with fairness. You can have two prosperous businessmen today, and five years from now one of them might be broke. Is that the fault of capitalism? Certainly there are all kinds of other factors that come into play. The rich get richer, because the person of wealth has more opportunities to make more wealth than does the guy with $20 dollars in his pocket. That is not a bad thing, unless the government or anyone else forces a person to stay down. The wealthy also have a different network of connections, which will enable them to further their cause. How many people have been successful because they have had a significant inheritance from family? On a smaller scale, those who graduate from college with no school loans have a significant head start on those who have the burdern of college loans. What kind of society do you want where there will not be these differences? You don't like the long-standing statement 'hard work leads to success'? Is that because you have seen exceptions? Do you have a better way (that is legal)? Would you like to teach the young that they should not bother working hard because they might not make it to the top? The people who are enjoying 'the excesses of capitalism' are in a position to improve the life of others, and they have many times. Certainly there are exceptions and that is part of the freedom package. That is how America has advanced as far as it has. Capitalism breaks down when government policy and taxes have caused the capitalist to take his money to Peru, or government wants to step in and act like private industry.
@djbtol (5493)
• United States
9 Dec 10
Just because there are exceptions, does not make capitalism a myth. The American dream is real and it has been lived out countless times. If it is becoming less and less, it is because it is being attacked viciously, both from without and within.
@jb78000 (15139)
9 Dec 10
i don't think you should be teaching people a myth as reality either. the american dream was never real and is becoming less and less real all the time. you can have a society where things are both fairer and hard work/drive/skills etc are rewarded. it is called a meritocracy and personally i'd aim for that. rather than the ogliarchy you've got, and seem to want to become stronger.
@jb78000 (15139)
9 Dec 10
it has been lived out perhaps once in a million. it is on a par with winning the lottery - possible but don't teach your children it is a realistic possibility if you do a, b and c. in fact you have more chance of living the american dream if you were not born in um america.
@pergammano (7682)
• Canada
9 Dec 10
OH..NO!!! I unwrapped your exquisite present with "a great flourish and applomb!" There inside, was a bubble, and it burst before my very eyes! And out came your message...OUCH, I wished I would have known you so many years before, I would have THEN known that all this hard work, labour...toil was just a never ending path...with NO rainbow at the end. Gee whiz..jb, what a rotten present...LOL! So off to work..I GO!
1 person likes this
@jb78000 (15139)
9 Dec 10
that wasn't quite my point but i am sorry your didn't like your present. here, have a christmas carrot instead.
2 people like this
@celticeagle (159227)
• Boise, Idaho
9 Dec 10
Maybe in some of their heads they think that their hard work is rewarded. In their little bubble maybe it is enough. The CEO's child probably doesn't care because he is lucky and can do as he pleases. The sweatshop worker is so busy sweating he doesn't know or care one way or the other.
@celticeagle (159227)
• Boise, Idaho
9 Dec 10
Yep. Until the end comes they won't be doing too badly.
@jb78000 (15139)
9 Dec 10
something else just occurred to me. middle class america doesn't have things that rough anyway. they might not end up with the huge piece of pie they think they will but they are still going to get a more than satisfactory chunk.
2 people like this
@marguicha (215604)
• Chile
9 Dec 10
I did it again! When I was little, I used to peak at the presents before I was supposed to open them. In this case, I have known what your present was even before you thought about giving it. Do you suppose Santa will give me another small present now that I opened the big one? I discovered a long time ago that the theory about wealth spilling (as those champagne glasses at weddings) didn´t work. Some people have stretch pockets and there´s nothing left for the rest. Merry Christmas!
@jb78000 (15139)
9 Dec 10
ok. bunnies are predictable. would you like a christmas carrot too?
2 people like this
@marguicha (215604)
• Chile
9 Dec 10
Please, friend!!! DO send me a carrot!
1 person likes this
@marguicha (215604)
• Chile
9 Dec 10
Thanks so much! The picture is awesome. But I think I will have to polish my English in order to make it. What is Demerara sugar?
@Netsbridge (3253)
• United States
9 Dec 10
No it is not, it appears! I just came from one site debating the same issue: Wealthy At the Expense of the Poor - http://www.chron.com/commons/forums.html?plckForumPage=ForumDiscussion&plckDiscussionId=Cat%3a3a6ace78-9ae1-4169-a425-36d95040c25fForum%3ab915327d-dfda-4d0e-9aa4-9f82bbbf5b62Discussion%3a0784e5ff-57fd-4cee-a673-c5451c42f858&plckCurrentPage=0
• United States
10 Dec 10
I am afraid you are not clear here. Care to be more explicit?
@jb78000 (15139)
10 Dec 10
you might enjoy playing in a couple of the previous boxes netsbridge. getting a bit too lively for my liking but you might like it.
@irisheyes (4370)
• United States
10 Dec 10
aas an American, I really want to believe that the best and the brightest and the hardest working always rise to the top. In fact, I've been conditioned to believe that. BUT within my own family we have one very rich and very sucessfl member who dispells it all. He is not the best or the brightest or the hardest working. He is just the luckiest little bugger in the gene pool. I can really relate to what you are saying here even if it's not what I've been raised to believe or what I want to believe. lol
@irisheyes (4370)
• United States
10 Dec 10
The sad and to me incredulous part of it is that many of those people in their effort to defend the work ethic of the rich, wind up voting against their own and their families best interests. They don't care about the healthcare or education of their own children so much as they care about believing in an disproved myth.
@jb78000 (15139)
10 Dec 10
well i have just come from a box load of people really kicking up a fuss because this isn't what they want to believe.
1 person likes this
@jb78000 (15139)
10 Dec 10
well conditioned eh?
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
9 Dec 10
If you really want to be successful in this country you need 4 things. Hard work, skills, ambition, and the often forgotten, persistence. Now if you're really good at one and ok at the others, you might still be successful, but you need all 4 to some degree. Slaving away flipping burgers isn't going to land you a CEO job if you never ask for a promotion or if you lack the skills to do more than flip a burger. Giving up the first time you fail to get a promotion isn't going to land you a CEO job either. If you're a sweatshop worker you've already shown that you lack ambition or any self-respect. The most ambitious thing you could do is get the he1l out, report them to the appropriate agencies, and go somewhere with potential for advancement. Sweatshops, by definition, are illegal in the US. If you are working in one, you are choosing to accept violations of labor laws and devaluing yourself. We all have equal opportunity at a good life in this country. We don't all have equal opportunity to get "Oprah-rich". Your article mentions that children to wealthier families have a better chance of being wealthy as adults. That's true simply because they have parents with the ability to teach them how to be successful and how to plan for a rainy day. I'm 32 and I have two IRAs, a 401k, an ICMARC retirement fund, and I own a fair amount of stock. If my father hadn't explained the benefits of these programs, I wouldn't have the IRAs right now and my 401k would be much smaller because it was my father's advice to contribute the maximum when I was 17 which is something I wouldn't have done on my own. Frankly, it's good to know that even those who are not succeeding realize they really do have the chance to be successful. I'm at a low point right now as I'm underemployed, didn't get the last promotion I interviewed for, and job opportunities are minimal. That said I know that it's just a matter of time before my situation improves because I do work hard, I have skills, and I won't stop trying to get a better job.
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
9 Dec 10
I'd be willing to bet that your father would have kicked your butt if you had even hinted at quitting school. I know that mine would have and I passed that expectation along to my children.
• United States
9 Dec 10
Something being more difficult to achieve, no matter how much more difficult, still doesn't qualify as impossible if it's not impossible. It's always going to be harder to reach success if you start from zero and especially if you start behind the 8 ball. Attending lesser schools, being from a poor background, not fitting into society socially - these are obstacles, for sure, many of which I can personally attest to. But they're not insurmountable. Some people having harder lives doesn't make success--the American dream--a myth, JB. There's no guarantee that you will succeed the first 20 times you try, whereas someone else might be born into circumstances where they're set up as "successful" without having to try once. You may have to scratch and claw out of the hole. But I just don't see how that counts as inequality as far as an opportunity for success is concerned. The roads to success might not be equal due to circumstance. Such is life. But success is a come one, come all destination. Some road work is needed, surely, but I just cannot fathom how it's the fault of "extreme capitalism."
@jb78000 (15139)
9 Dec 10
"We all have equal opportunity at a good life in this country" well no, you don't. but anyway i am not going to go back into the culture of stratified societies because i think spall covered it very well up there.
@p1kef1sh (45681)
1 Apr 11
So this bubble? Is it an Aero bubble? Does the sweet shop worker make it. Must be fun making chocolate covered bubbles all day. I did sociology at college. I took a positivist stance on the reality of the Aero bubble. My stance was simple. I like bubbles therefore I like the reality of the invisible over the visible. That was too deep so I transferred to philosophy. They had breakfast tutorials in philosophy. They also lacked any concept of time. Breakfast as a student was never earlier than 10am. I had to stay up all night to get there on time. Nope, i have no idea why I wrote this drivel. But your was a discussion that I did not answer at the time that you posted it.
@p1kef1sh (45681)
1 Apr 11
I wonder if it was the South Sea Bubble? The ultimate capitalist dream. Total monopoly of the market designed to attract maximum investment by the unwary resulting in a massive crash. Whilst up North in the Americas the East India Company tries to make a cuppa.....
@jb78000 (15139)
1 Apr 11
it was lovely drivel and full of bubbles. somebody resurrected this discussion a few days ago - not sure how they found it. maybe searching for the word 'bubble'
@jb78000 (15139)
1 Apr 11
i'm going to have a cuppa.
@Hatley (163781)
• Garden Grove, California
10 Dec 10
oh blue bunny at ten fifteen in the evening and me with a headache I cannot quite get with this new bust down my America, so just am saying I am really kinda happy with my US right or wrong as its still pretty damned good anyway.sure we have our faults but so does every country on earth and ours is still free.So I just let all your frets roll off me as I am too tired and also a little ill tonight so am not into politics if I ever was. work smart not harder is my motto and it has worked in my life. so am off to bed. Merry early christmas.
@djbtol (5493)
• United States
10 Dec 10
Sorry Hatley, bunny has very nasty things to say about the US. And she/he/it has a better country?
@jb78000 (15139)
10 Dec 10
i am sorry you are feeling ill. it wasn't an american bust btw - i only put in the states as an example of a stratified country, mainly to annoy the team in here. would you like a christmas carrot pudding too?
@jb78000 (15139)
10 Dec 10
go back to your own box djbtol. i already explained to you what a 'nasty rant' was and that i wasn't making one.
11 Dec 10
No-one ever said that everyone has an equal chance of success. But capitalism - meaning an economic system where you are free to own and trade your property (including your labour) - is the only morally-correct economic system. It's also the only system that enables progress, because everyone is free to pursue their own ideas for their own profit and at their own risk. Systems based on theft and coercion, such as socialism, are the most class-ridden societies in existence. Take your hypothetical sweatshop worker. Today he's just making enough money to support himself, but who knows what he could be doing in the future? Unless he's living in a society where the state actively suppresses new enterprises, there's no hard and fast reason why he can't set up a small business at some point and build up from there. People can and do go from grinding poverty to riches through their own efforts - they just need the freedom to try.
11 Dec 10
What uncontrolled capitalism? Where? Show me an example of a country with a truly laissez faire capitalist economy and I'll move there. And who are you to say that someone you don't know has little chance of success? I don't write people off, especially when they're complete strangers to me.
@jb78000 (15139)
11 Dec 10
uncontrolled capitalism reduces freedom for all bar a very few. no, that sweatshop worker has very little chance of ever making it, and not because their governments suppresses free enterprise at all.
@jb78000 (15139)
12 Dec 10
capitalism with no restraints. on an individual country basis it doesn't exist anywhere. the closest you'll get is probably russia - want to move there? but on a global scale it needs sorting - i.e. more restraints - one billion people going hungry because of economics is simply wrong. and i am not writing people off - i have mentioned before said sweatshop workers aren't stuck in that situation because they lack intelligence, determination or drive.
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
9 Dec 10
I wrote something very long in Lil's box so I'll try to keep this one shorter. I do agree with you that not everybody has an equal chance for success here in the U.S. I have cared about this inequality and tried to do my bit to help level the playing field in the past...not because I expected anyone to be able to go from living their life changing tires to becoming the CEO of a national tire producer...but because there is an "in between" that is attainable. Even in a class stratified society like the U.S., there are subclasses where one can make great strides in their personal circumstances through education and hard work. While it is true that few go from being "poor" to "wealthy", it is possible to go from "poor" to "middle class" to "upper middle class".
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
9 Dec 10
This is true. There are many areas of the middle and basic survival is definitely not a problem in any of them. I also know that the "poor" suffer more when the country goes into a recession compared to those in any of the other classes because they tend to be more isolated in little pockets of low income communities, with little corner stores that already cost more than at the chains and are more dependent on public transportation. They're the least likely to have any kind of savings and employment opportunities are slimmer.
@jb78000 (15139)
9 Dec 10
i'd address the bottom tier mainly. to be brutally honest once you get to lower middle class/upper working class/whatever your term is for 'not quite poor' is, in most developed countries a) you don't have real problems (like no shelter/food/medical help) anyway and b) you can climb up a bit if you want. i know it is more difficult in some than others.
@andy77e (5156)
• United States
12 Dec 10
No one said everybody will have an 'equal' anything. But if you think that not everyone has the opportunity, that's wrong as well. America is filled with the stories of people who started with nothing, and made millions. Go read the stories, the biographies, and the company histories. This idea that only the wealthy kids, end up wealthy adults, is complete idiocy. Chris Gardner was homeless. Now he's a multi-millionaire. Steve Jobs was a hippy, starting a company in a garage. Alex Spanos sold sandwiches. The list of stories goes on and on and on. And no, hard work does not automatically mean success. But if you think success isn't a product of hard work, you are fooling yourself. I have read the stories of dozens of successful people. Most put in 50 to 60 hours a week. There's a publication local to my area called the "Small Business News", in which they talk to companies operating, just in my little suburb. They feature CEOs, and how they made it, and are earning a living. So no, I don't buy this socialistic crap about how 'the little guy' can't make it. It's garbage. I worked at an Advanced Auto Parts shop. A guy there saved up money from his $9/hour job, bought a carpet cleaning truck, and started his own carpet cleaning business. Now he's making some good cash. He's working hard, and it's paying off. I'm always blown away by these types of comments, because the evidence (from my point of view) is just massive. Granted I have my eye balls open to this, and most don't. But if you just look around in your own little area, I wager you'd see hundreds of examples of people working hard, and raking in the money. Oh but no no, we have to keep our political belief system which says that's not possible, so we can justify some leftist ideology.
@andy77e (5156)
• United States
13 Dec 10
This complete leftist crap just blows me away. Yet the reality of how great the Capitalist system is all around us, yet the stupid left have their head shoved so far up their lame political ideology, they can't find their rearends with both hands. Just TODAY... I listened to the most recent podcast by EconTalk, which interviewed a woman business owner named Wafaya Abdallah, who owns a salon. http://www.econtalk.org/archives/2010/12/abdallah_on_hai.html At the end of the podcast, 58 minutes, she is asked what the advantages are for someone who comes here from somewhere else, who doesn't speak English, and has no recognized education. She then talks about her father, born and raised Egyptian. In her own words, there are two classes in Egypt. Rich, and poor. If you are born poor, it doesn't matter how much education you have, you remain in the poor class. If you born rich, it doesn't matter if you are educated, you are rich. Her father comes to America, and shows up in Charlotte NC, and knows very little English nor has much money. He works in a Hardee's (a low end restaurant), and as a Janitor (garbage man) at the local hospital in 1970. Five years later, while supporting a family, he gets a masters degree (high cost), and ends up head administrator for Charlotte Community Hospital. Oh! But that can't be! He doesn't have the same opportunities as a born and raised and educated in America! Right, he didn't. But he worked hard, and used the opportunities he did have, and succeeded. Reminded me of a story I'd forgotten. Back in 1997 I was working a Wendy's (fast food joint). There was a guy there from Romania. He escaped the civil war, with his wife, and 2 children. He was so poor, he didn't even have a car, and walked to work every day. He spoke in broken English. His kids rode second hand bicycles to school. His wife walked to the store, and walked back. But he was on time every single day, which made all the kids with automobiles look really pathetic for being late. He worked hard, and was never outside for a 30 minute smoke break. Last I heard from him, he was manager of a Hertz Rent-a-Car. Not just manager, but store manager. And not just any ol Hertz in the middle of nowhere, but the biggest Hertz in central Ohio, the one by the International Airport. And yet what do we hear from the whiny left? It's not fair! There's injustice! We don't have equal opportunity! Ya'll need to grow up and get a job. Stop whining for a living, and complaining everyone isn't meeting your every want and desire, and go get a job. Grow up. Stop holding your breath and having a temper tantrum waiting for government to fix your lives. Get yourself in gear and go earn a living. Even the story of Wafaya Abdallah, is an example of what Americans used to be, and should be. She wanted to get a degree in law. Didn't she whine and complain, and demand government pay for her education? No, she decided to *GASP* get a job! Earn money, and pay for it herself. So she got a job at a beauty salon, but she didn't like the way it was run. Did she whine and complain, and demand government fix her problems? No, she went from place to place until she found a place she liked to work. But she still wasn't happy. Did she whine and complain about how capitalism doesn't work? No, she went to workshops and teaching classes to better her skills. And finally, she opened her own salon. Did she whine and complain and demand government give her money to do it? Did she demand government offer loans? No, she saved up her money (instead of blowing it on new cars and big screen HD Plasma TVs and crap), and used it to start the place up. Now why is it that we have to go find an immigrant from Egypt, in order to see how hard work and effort makes for success? Why? Real simple. We have too many baby leftists who never grew up, running around complaining about capitalism. Funny how in Egypt, a place closely aligned with Soviet Russia and had similar economic policies, has a system so bad, people are coming here to flourish and succeed in. These whiny complainy people, need to shut up about how unfair the world is, and go do something worth while. Stop blowing smoke about how you don't have the opportunities, when people who can't even speak the language come here and are amazingly successful. Hey, if you can't take all the amazing opportunities you DO have, feel free to go to Russia, Cuba, Venezuela, or any other non-capitalist based country, and find out what injustice really is.
@andy77e (5156)
• United States
25 Mar 11
Doesn't matter. When you whine and complain about "capitalism" you fail. FAIL! You don't have a clue what people in other countries go through. You don't have a clue what it's like to live in a government controlled economy where if you are born in the poor area, you remain poor for life. Praise the almighty equality. Equally poor for everyone born poor. You have to same opportunity to remain exactly where you are, for the rest of your miserable life. Equality, fairness, and all that crap... all result in the same thing. Poverty and hopelessness. Look at what happened in Tunisia! Why did the guy set himself on fire? What was that all about? The government controls who can open a food stand, and he didn't have a permit. Government control. Socialism. Eliminating the freedom of capitalism. He was trying to be a capitalist! Can't have that! That's unfair to others who can't open a food stand. Capitalism works every time its tried. It's working in China. Working in India. Go read what it was like under socialism in any country and compare their "Equality" you so desire to the standard of living in any capitalist based economy. There is no comparison. People are not swimming to Cuba from the US. They are swimming from the US to Cuba. You want equality? I dare you to shut up about it, and actually move to a socialistic country. Any country where they have equality as the highest ideal. Go for it. Come back in 10 years, and tell me how much better it is.
@jb78000 (15139)
25 Mar 11
what a shame i missed these two rants before. i'm not whining about anything personally incidentally.
@tarachand (3895)
• India
27 Nov 11
Though hard work is an important function for any ideology-be it capitalism or communism, it is the value that the work brings to the table, a sweeper may work hard, but, what is the end result in the value addition? What is the skill level required to clean and what are the skill levels required to run even a division of a company. Physical labor is the one factor that actually makes things happen, but there is a chance that the things are happening in an uncontrolled manner. The manager aligns the inputs and the outputs of various people who are involved in physical labor, and hence is adding more value by creating a form of a coherence. In a simple company structure, many managers are controlled by a division head and all the divisions could ultimately be controlled by one person - the ball stops there. Investors, if not involved in the running or the direct work, too have taken a risk to invest money in an enterprise that they believe will add wealth-without them, the basic laborer would not have the opportunity to work. It's a case of complete as well limited symbiosis from different points of view. A particular laborer may not be able to earn his living unless the management and the corporate structure was there, the management also can't do with out labor, but the management has the choice of employing any suitable candidate, not necessarily that particular individual. I think you get the picture - too long this response - one more condition that has a big role to play - it can make a king a beggar and a beggar a king - lady luck!
@bestboy19 (5478)
• United States
14 Dec 10
People tolerate the excesses of capitalism because they know that without it, there's no money to pay for the social programs some think they deserve. The chunk of the pie many want is what someone else has worked hard to pay for. If that sweatshop worker wants to be CEO of Nike, he's going to have to learn more than just how to build a shoe. Contrary to what many believe, mental labor can be harder than physical labor, especially when you're the CEO. Hard work leading to success depends on your definition of success or your definition of hard work. Social programs that don't encourage achievement but rather dependency aren't about justice or freedom either.
@jb78000 (15139)
25 Mar 11
"If that sweatshop worker wants to be CEO of Nike, he's going to have to learn more than just how to build a shoe. " yes, like how to be born into the right place.
@K46620 (1986)
• United States
10 Dec 10
What is extreme capitalism? I wonder if you mean corporatism, instead.
@jb78000 (15139)
10 Dec 10
well, what definition are you using for each?
@K46620 (1986)
• United States
14 Dec 10
I don’t know what you mean by extreme capitalism. Corporatism generally means large corporations and government “are in bed together”, and scratch each other’s backs. It is characterized by significant government controls over the economy, which usually benefit corporations with political influence. None of that is characteristic of a free market.
@millertime (1394)
• United States
11 Dec 10
I agree that some people have an advantage in this world. The rich have an advantage over the poor and would have a better chance of success. I do have a couple of questions though. What do you mean by "extreme capitalism"? You also said that the "hard work leads to success myth is not true, and in very class stratified societies (like the United States) even less true." Are you saying that nobody can achieve success through hard work? And if it's "less true" in the U.S., where else in the world does anyone have a better chance at achieving success?
@jb78000 (15139)
12 Dec 10
i answered a couple of your questions above. and to answer the other question: germany, sweden, canada, australia, the uk (just), finland, norway, france (just), etc.
• United States
12 Dec 10
I was going to compose a detailed response but I think it would be a waste of my time to argue with you since you seem to have quite a cynical view of the world and the U.S. so I'll suffice to say I disagree with you...
@trruk1 (1028)
• United States
10 Dec 10
People who have done well in their lives (financial stability is doing well; not rich, just stable) almost without exception attribute their success to their own hard work. Therefore, in their minds, those who have not done well are struggling because of their lack of effort. If you believe that if you are affluent, it is due to work (and work only) then anybody who is not affluent is lazy. the concept is that if you deserve what you have, then other people (who may have nothing at all) deserve their status as well. People with that attitude never consider that if they had been given a different unit of blood during that transfusion they would have AIDS. If the driver of the car they were riding in had not seen the guy running the red light, they would be paraplegic. Much of what happens in our lives is the result of happenstance and circumstances beyond our control. Bill Gates is actually not very bright. If he had grown up in the 1940s he might have made assistant manager at a furniture store. But nobody ever says, "I am doing well because I was born in 1954. If I had been born in 1934 I would be dirt poor." Nobody says it. Nobody thinks it. The only way to attribute success to any endeavor entirely to your personal efforts, with no luck thrown in, is to assert that those who failed did so because of lack of effort. Here is a fact of life: Nobody ever got rich just by working hard. Nobody. Ever.
@jb78000 (15139)
10 Dec 10
quite right. that is a very, very common way of thinking. you'll also find if those same people experience a run of bad luck suddenly it will be bad luck, not their own mistakes. which is probably true, but the same is true the other way around. not good for self esteem though.