Cut Where? Where to Cut The Government Budget?
@valentinesdiner (1214)
United States
February 9, 2011 6:15pm CST
Congress is serious in looking to cut the federal budget and here in NY State our new Governor is figuring on $10,000,000,000 in cuts.
The Chair of the House Appropriations Committee wants to cut hundreds of millions from food aid to women, infants and children and President Obama wants to cut Energy Assistance to the poor by billions!
How would you cut the budget? Hey, should we be even having this conversation during a recession?
By the way... I'm baaaaaack!
2 people like this
8 responses
@valentinesdiner (1214)
• United States
10 Feb 11
Haven't been around for a while. Don't fit into a box all taht well, though I believe Obama is doing a good job, taht Ron Paul has some important points we should pay attention to and think Congresswoman Bachman is pretty nutty.
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
23 Feb 11
And if jb puts you in the nutjob box, you'll be in good company
as I'm sure I am there!
valentinesdiner, to answer your question, I'd cut everything but non essentials. Essentials being those that the federal government has business being involved in, maintaining infrastructure, support and food and medical care for our elderly and disabled and vets, military, law enforcement. I don't like the fact we've borrowed money from China. I think the people elected the Representatives and governors they did this last election cause the deficit scares the hell out of them. As a private person, I've tightened my belt. It's time Washington did so as well.
as I'm sure I am there!
valentinesdiner, to answer your question, I'd cut everything but non essentials. Essentials being those that the federal government has business being involved in, maintaining infrastructure, support and food and medical care for our elderly and disabled and vets, military, law enforcement. I don't like the fact we've borrowed money from China. I think the people elected the Representatives and governors they did this last election cause the deficit scares the hell out of them. As a private person, I've tightened my belt. It's time Washington did so as well.
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
10 Feb 11
If we really reduced spending to the levels they were at 10 years ago then yes, it really would be enough. Heck Rand Paul already has a clear plan to cut $500 billion in one year.
You really can't raise taxes enough to deal with a trillion dollar deficit. Even if you robbed the richest people in this country blind you wouldn't get much more than maybe $200 billion out of them and that's if you took EVERYTHING from them.
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
11 Feb 11
I guess I should have clarified how many of the richest I meant. If you rob everyone on the entire Forbes than yes, you could get about 1.5 trillion. So rob all of them, and you can balance the budget for ONE YEAR.
I agree on cutting the defense budget. We could just pull out of all those countries that don't need us like Iceland, Germany, Japan, etc. Social security should be axed in its entirety and people should get back all the money they put into it adjusted for interest and inflation if possible. Then people can get back to saving for their own retirements through private investments which are far more reliable than the ponzi scheme the government forces them into.
@trruk1 (1028)
• United States
10 Feb 11
Actually, if we robbed the richest people, we would get more like $1.5 trillion. That isn't enough if that's all we do. Some spending has to be cut somewhere. Cutting the defense budget in half would be a start. Cutting Social Security would work the wrong way. It would throw many people, maybe several million, on to the mercy of their local governments, and local governments have been just as careless at minding spending as the feds. Social Security is called an entitlement for a good reason. People pay in to it and they are entitled to receive the benefits.
We could also stop federal support of local projects. You need a new bridge? Fine. Go ahead and build it. Federal money should go for federal highways and only federal highways.
the real problem is that every federal dollar spent goes to somebody and that somebody wants to keep it.

@bobmnu (8157)
• United States
11 Feb 11
We need to look at the Constitution and fund those things that are required by the Constitution. I would privatize many of the Government agencies. Cut the congressional staff to one staffer for each congressman or woman. They can hire more if they need them using campaign donations to fund them.
@laglen (19759)
• United States
10 Feb 11
Hey, should we be even having this conversation during a recession?
If not now, then when? people are earning less, therefore paying less in taxes. there is less "other people money to go around". There is so much waste in government agencies and the feds are over reaching their role.
I like Rand Pauls ideas for cuts,
http://www.mylot.com/w/discussions/2486478.aspx
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
10 Feb 11
This is how I would reduce the bloated budget.
First, all departments and bureaus would be reviewed to justify their existence under the US Constitution. Each department and bureau that survives would be audited down to the penny. The budgets of all departments would be cut by 10%, then more cuts would be imposed (based on the outcome of the audits). Their budgets would be cut equal to the amount of fraud and waste. Obviously they have been running without those funds just fine, so they can continue to do so. This means all three branches, including both Houses of Congress, the White House and the Supreme Court).
No sacred cows, no special exceptions.
@sierras236 (2739)
• United States
10 Feb 11
Why shouldn't Congress be looking at cutting during a recession? Everyone else in the country is doing budget reevaluations.
Why should Congress continue to spend way more than they collect even if taxes were set at 100%?
The fact is cuts have to be made. Some of them are going to be extremely painful. It is unavoidable. Unfortunately, those social programs are the number one drain on many State budgets. Of course, a lot of those cuts won't be passed. But the Committees do have to evaluate the budget without involving emotion.
@Rollo1 (16676)
• Boston, Massachusetts
10 Feb 11
Welcome Back!
Look on the bright side - they cut more out of the IRS budget than they did the Energy Assistance.
The best thing that could come from cuts would be if the cuts forced these agencies to work more efficiently. The truth is that more money for assistance often gets eaten up in administrative costs and the increase to the needy doesn't have the impact it should have.
Some of the other cuts are fantastic and well overdue.








