They did it all for me, and I am just an ingrate

@Rollo1 (16679)
Boston, Massachusetts
September 23, 2015 7:04pm CST
For about the umpteenth time I just read a comment on that other site from someone nameless in which they referenced people who were only there "for the money". Well... yeah. I mean, that's what the site was set up as, right? The social media site that pays you for participation. So you participate for five or six months. Every day. And then when you ask for the payment, you're just a greedy, ungrateful complainer.
25 people like this
21 responses
@LadyDuck (459170)
• Switzerland
24 Sep 15
What a stupid thing to say, of course we write also for the money. Do Arvind keeps the site simple because he want to be generous with the users who helped him make money? Surely not, he keeps the site ONLY for the money, there is no difference.
7 people like this
@Rollo1 (16679)
• Boston, Massachusetts
24 Sep 15
They built the site to become famous and rich. They moved on to Sweeble for the same reason. Everyone wants to be Mark Zuckerberg.
6 people like this
@Rollo1 (16679)
• Boston, Massachusetts
24 Sep 15
@Raelove I have just spent some time watching video interviews and reading press releases from way back when. The social media site that pays was the model. And they expressed a desire to make it possible for people in third world countries to earn some money to improve their lots in life. Then they blocked those countries.
1 person likes this
@LadyDuck (459170)
• Switzerland
24 Sep 15
@Raelove I completely agree, if he was honest and really in trouble and would asked us to help, I am sure that many of us would have accepted to work for a certain period without earnings. This is not the case he cheated us.
4 people like this
@shaggin (71663)
• United States
24 Sep 15
What site is this that you are talking about? I am guessing Bubblews? I am still writing on personapaper but I gave up on Bubblews after the second time I reached payout and they didn't pay me. That's a lot of work to not get money for in the end. Even though we are there for the fun of it we expect to get what we are owed! If I wanted to do things for free I would just write on facebook all the time.
6 people like this
@Rollo1 (16679)
• Boston, Massachusetts
24 Sep 15
Yes, the B site. I doubt the owners set it up out of charity. They expect to make money and somehow, we are supposed to do it out of love.
6 people like this
@shaggin (71663)
• United States
24 Sep 15
@Rollo1 Thats so true they are earning money off us for writing but then they are not sharing it with us like they promised. I've written on lots of sites over the years. I love the connection with others but once they stop paying it just becomes a waste of my time so I quit. I go on facebook and socialize that is the only thing I do online that I don't earn money for. I feel the rest of my time should be spent earning some extra money towards my kids Christmas presents and birthday presents and a summer of fun. Right now I am in need of another van so that is what all my money is going to be going towards. A little extra money from online sites will help.
@bookbar (1609)
• Sudbury, England
24 Sep 15
@Rollo1 So we provide our love of communication as an act of charity, so they can waste more money, travelling the world, trying to launch their stupid Sweeble toy...boy that's charitable,.. albeit we kept the site afloat through all that 'Class Act' kerfuffle that came close to taking the site to it's graveyard...so never mind 'money' not even, something as cheap as gratitude....
4 people like this
@valmnz (17099)
• New Zealand
24 Sep 15
That's another reason I walked away.
4 people like this
@mom210 (9041)
• United States
24 Sep 15
I would love to live in a place in my life where I did not have to worry about money. But I am not there, yes, I want to money and I want money that is promised and owed to me.
5 people like this
@Dragonairy1 (1722)
• Newcastle Upon Tyne, England
24 Sep 15
I don't think anyone who is still there, is there just for the money, but it's certainly a big reason many of us joined, and contributed so much. At the end of the day they breached our trust , we made our choices based on their offer of money, an offer they've not lived up to, so I think people are entitled to feel annoyed. I know for me now it's just a hobby I go on to see people I like, if I ever see my money that might change.
4 people like this
@Rollo1 (16679)
• Boston, Massachusetts
24 Sep 15
To some extent, I think that is a reasonable motive for being there. Except that they make money, even if they don't pay it to anyone else. Maybe they are making a lot less than they did even when the lowered the pay rate. Maybe they spent it on those two parties they threw this summer where the champagne flowed and nubile young women in bikinis draped themselves over the shoulders of the B -Team. Who knows?
3 people like this
@xFiacre (12631)
• Ireland
24 Sep 15
I suppose the complainer is contributing just to share their depressing complaints with the world and turns down any cash rewards!
4 people like this
@Rollo1 (16679)
• Boston, Massachusetts
24 Sep 15
I feel a little stupid for believing them and trying so hard to keep people there for so long. Now, I guess I am a complainer.
9 people like this
@xFiacre (12631)
• Ireland
24 Sep 15
@Rollo1 I've no faith in them whatsoever and the site is bound to die soon.
1 person likes this
@OneOfMany (12150)
• United States
24 Sep 15
@Rollo1 Well we were all hopeful for a rebound. They said that the site was making more money than it was giving out. If that were true then paying people would be to their advantage. That's why I asked them to explain their business model yesterday because what they are doing and said don't match at all.
2 people like this
@rusty2rusty (6751)
• Defiance, Ohio
24 Sep 15
I refuse to write for many months and not get paid. It seems sites like that only burn members anymore. I take to site I know will pay with in a months time or less. With lower payout.
1 person likes this
• Defiance, Ohio
24 Sep 15
@Rollo1 Yes, I am aware of Bubblews. I still have an account with them. However, I no longer write for them. As I will no guess if I will be paid or not. They did people dirty. I do not like doing business with websites I know that are shady. Bubblews is hady.
• Defiance, Ohio
25 Sep 15
@Raelove They are selfish and want all the money for themselves. More like scammers who don't care about their members. As long as they get their money.
@Rollo1 (16679)
• Boston, Massachusetts
24 Sep 15
A lot of sites have payment dates and all payments are issued weekly or monthly. Bubblews never did that. They've been having this payment trouble since 2013.
1 person likes this
• United States
24 Sep 15
Right? Those people get on my nerves. Like they're not there for the money too. Sure, there is more than money, but doesn't everybody expect to receive what they've spent time earning?
3 people like this
@Rollo1 (16679)
• Boston, Massachusetts
24 Sep 15
Without our writing, they wouldn't have a site. But they act like they are doing us a favor and get all hurt if we want the money after a year of writing for them.
3 people like this
@glenniah (1197)
• Mandurah, Australia
24 Sep 15
How Rude! I wonder do the people who write this stuff say 'No' when they have earned their money. I think not.
3 people like this
@Rollo1 (16679)
• Boston, Massachusetts
24 Sep 15
It's highly unlikely that they've been starving and living in an attic for the last three years. In fact, they've been partying by the pool . They threw two huge parties this summer for their new project, complete with champagne and scantily-clad girls.
1 person likes this
@suziecat7 (3350)
• Asheville, North Carolina
24 Sep 15
We were all there for the money at first. Many of us stayed because of the people even with no money. But the glitches have become ridiculous and the staff truly doesn't seem to care about the posters at all.
2 people like this
@Rollo1 (16679)
• Boston, Massachusetts
24 Sep 15
We stayed to support one another and we accepted the slow earnings. But since it's not so easy to redeem, they can't be overloaded with requests.
2 people like this
@thea09 (18305)
• Greece
26 Sep 15
I never understand those types that rush to defend sites that break their payment terms. It was the same when Helium started stealing the royalties we were still due when they suddenly plummeted to nothing, there were old stalwarts defending Helium.
2 people like this
@Rollo1 (16679)
• Boston, Massachusetts
26 Sep 15
Helium changed terms almost as often as the B-team did. I gave them a second chance, more fool me and it's all on me that I did. But even I reach a point where I have to give up any hope. There is one who defends all the time, but is now a member who is part of management, so defense is her job. I wouldn't do it. I couldn't do it.
2 people like this
@thea09 (18305)
• Greece
26 Sep 15
@Rollo1 Is she paid for it tho' or does it just make her feel important?
2 people like this
@Rollo1 (16679)
• Boston, Massachusetts
26 Sep 15
@thea09 I couldn't say for sure but based on what I saw said, it may be that she is compensated. I don't know which is worse, really. I suppose it could be need or naivete. I mean, true believers have worked against their own best interests before.
1 person likes this
@hereandthere (45651)
• Philippines
24 Sep 15
i keep thinking of it as a chicken and egg situation. there was an invitation (from them), there was a promise (from them), so why are they surprised that members had expectations (and later demands) after they did their part? then they say they never owe members anything at all, not even a decent explanation on why sometimes they're paid and sometimes not. people did their part to help and gave many suggestions, but the rules had various interpretations and enforced inconsistently so people started saying there are 'hidden rules'. people also used words like 'lottery' and 'lucky' when it came to being paid.
3 people like this
@Rollo1 (16679)
• Boston, Massachusetts
24 Sep 15
It is my opinion that if you have a contract, then say the rules and terms have changed, but still pay people according to the contract, then you've affirmed the contract and the duty to pay.
1 person likes this
@OneOfMany (12150)
• United States
24 Sep 15
How could you just write for money?! Shameless! After all, we write for charity and never think about the pennies we're not getting after a day of posting and commenting and trying to get others to do that same... of course. And if that's how people really felt they'd be chatting on Facebook or writing a personal blog. It's just hypocritical rhetoric.
2 people like this
@Rollo1 (16679)
• Boston, Massachusetts
24 Sep 15
Even my blogs are monetized. I don't need to get people to see what I write, I do it for pay, and that's just how shallow I am.
3 people like this
@OneOfMany (12150)
• United States
24 Sep 15
@Rollo1 It's how we all are in this world of wanting more. We don't write just for pleasure unless it's at a write-for-pleasure site. I did that for years and had fun, but now I like a monetary reward even if it's pennies.
1 person likes this
@Inlemay (17714)
• South Africa
24 Sep 15
I just tried to log in and it tells me the site is under maintenance again?
3 people like this
@Rollo1 (16679)
• Boston, Massachusetts
24 Sep 15
Glad to hear it. Every time I can't get in, I wonder if I am banned
2 people like this
• Canada
24 Sep 15
Yes, I was just there, too, and keep getting the blue screen. Do you think it's because they want to slow down people deleting their posts?
2 people like this
@Inlemay (17714)
• South Africa
24 Sep 15
@Rollo1 my thoughts as well - I have tried all afternoon and evening. Its the third time this week - tells me something is BREWING again!!! I am so close to that 50 - i will be so pisssssssss$$ if they CRASH!!!
2 people like this
@pumpkinjam (8539)
• United Kingdom
24 Sep 15
I've given up even thinking about doing anything for the money. Although I understand the frustration. Nobody would think us ungrateful for asking for wages after we'd done a job so it doesn't make sense that people get all snotty about it when they've not paid as they promised. They've obviously had the same idea as when this place was taken over by people thinking, mistakenly, that they'd keep the good contributors and get rid of those only here for the money if they stopped paying.
1 person likes this
@Rollo1 (16679)
• Boston, Massachusetts
24 Sep 15
The majority of people who join a site that pays, join because it pays. Simple and logical. But they get all hurt and wounded if people are unhappy because they weren't paid, telling us how hard they are working.
1 person likes this
@loki1982 (780)
• Dallas, Texas
24 Sep 15
I stopped writing for them when they made the payment change. I've literally made like 5 cents on the 400 articles I have written there in a year. They need to be sued. If they cant pay what they promise, they need to make it clear what they can pay and let people decide if what they CAN pay is worth it.
1 person likes this
@Rollo1 (16679)
• Boston, Massachusetts
24 Sep 15
I don't think you can sue them, most place have it in the TOS that you will use mediation or arbitration.
@Beatburn (4287)
• Philippines
24 Sep 15
There is a special place in hell for those who make people trust and hope and abandon them just like that. If hell were real. If it isn't, there is a special place in jail for those kinds of people. That's it! They should be sued.
1 person likes this
@Rollo1 (16679)
• Boston, Massachusetts
24 Sep 15
I don't want to send them to hell. I don't even want to sue them. I would like it though, if they stopped acting as if we did something wrong in asking for payment.
1 person likes this
• Canada
24 Sep 15
It does grate on your nerves when they play that card. WHO is in it just for the money?? Not the administrators, right?
1 person likes this
@Rollo1 (16679)
• Boston, Massachusetts
24 Sep 15
Well it's just stupid. It's like I invite you over for dinner and then express surprise that you expected food to be served. And then accuse you of only visiting me when you're hungry. They seem to forget, they invited us.
@bluesa (15023)
• Johannesburg, South Africa
24 Sep 15
Of course earning matters. Yes the social part is great, but then they should never have said they are a paying site!
1 person likes this
@Rollo1 (16679)
• Boston, Massachusetts
24 Sep 15
Exactly. They told us they paid for content and interaction and we believed them.
1 person likes this
@pgntwo (22408)
• Derry, Northern Ireland
24 Sep 15
Somebody's all riled up - lots of 'em.
1 person likes this
@Rollo1 (16679)
• Boston, Massachusetts
24 Sep 15
Well... yes. I really hate dishonesty. And just being silent when people ask questions is a form of dishonesty. Tell me terrible truths, but don't tell me lies and never pretend you didn't hear me ask the question. Riled. Yes.
1 person likes this