Miracles- impossible?

You have a typo at the beginning of your discussion my friend. You wrote " If I said that I saw a seventeen year old baby read fluently, would you believe me?", I suppose you wanted to write 17 months baby. I have heard about "genius" babies, some were musicians, others were able to speak in public like adults.

It could be hereditary and the parents being experts might have stimulated something in her although it's unintentional i would believe

I have heard that children can read at an very young age. This baby might be one of the youngest..

In kindergarten classes, many babies start to read at 18 or 19 months old. Reading fluently at 17 months is certainly impressive, but I would not tell that it is a miracle. Personally I believe in miracles : I have been the beneficiary of a little health miracle in the city of Lourdes when I was 6 years old. I remember it perfectly, and somewhere it changed my life.

Lol their is a typo, im like any 17 year old should be able to read but an 17 months is very rare

Nonbelievers tend to question everything. Is that video authentic?

I have heard about few children who started to read from early years- but not from their seventeenth month or so. I think kids can start to read from their second year -if they are trained properly.

That is awesome! Now kids are much smarter at a younger age. When I was a child - I didn't have all of this technology, trends and such! I think it is possible! Example by 4 kids should be potty trained but some even start as little as a year or less than 2 years old! Kids are much more smarter and capable now.

I think it is a typographical error. It appears to be impossible if read this title for the first time.

I think anything is possible with God.

Christian faith is predicated on the resurrection of Christ-that is what the Apostolic testimony is concerning, the identify of Christ, the resurrection of that proof, and the Apostles testimony to that. Contrary to what many have thought, there are very rational reasons for that, which certain modern apologists have pointed out, and which even critical scholarship admits, that the Apostles belief in the resurrection happened from their at least beleiving that they had seen Jesus alive again-critical scholarship stops short of saying that as fact, but at least admits the "belief" of that event. The question always remains, why did they believe that? They were either delusional, lying, or they had encountered the resurrected Jesus-that they were delusional is not likely, because we are not talking about one man's witness-that they were lying is also unlikely, because for that many people to have suffered for what they knew to be a lie is a psychological improbability-many rational minds have concieded the latter, that it was a real event. But there is also another witness, as Paul speaks of the Gift of the Holy Spirit, and what a person experiences of God in the Christian life.