Decline in casual restaurant dining, lets blame the millenials!

United States
June 10, 2017 2:32pm CST
No, let's not, please. Just a few days ago, I came across an article in my Facebook news feed that blames the millenials for the decline in the casual dining chains such as Chili's, Applebees, and similar restaurants.  Back when I was in my early twenties, (which was only just over 15 years ago) I used to frequent these establishments.  Of course, this was back before the recession happened.  The food was more bang for your buck, and the food was also delicious and not quite as mainstream.  So why now, the decline? Why are we blaming the millenials for the sudden decline?  The article stated that more millenials are opting to cook at home, or opting for more of the fast casual stuff like Chipotle, Cafe Rio, or Panera.  I started thinking about other reasons for the decline and my reasons for not going to these establishments anymore.  One, and this is a big one for me, is that the cost has skyrocketed.  Ever since the recession has landed me in a smaller town, I no longer have $15 to drop down on just one meal.  That's $15 that I can spend on at least 4 meals to cook at home. I usually budget with price points, once a thing or meal hits above that price point, I no longer can afford it.  I guess I'm thrifty that way. The next reason I don't go to these establishments anymore is that the quality, quantity, and taste of the food has gone downhill.  You don't get much for your money, and with more cultural dining on the rise, the food at these establishments have gone mainstream, meaning they all start to taste the same.  The last reason I don't go to these establishments anymore is that I now live in a smaller town with not much in the way of variety when it comes to eating out.  In fact, all we have is just a few fast food joints, and Wingers and a Costa Vida.  I mean, they are all really good, but there's not enough of a population here to support much more. (Buuut, we have a Starbucks here finally!)  I guess the moral of this story is, that every 10 years, theres always something to blame for a decline, but in reality, the core has always stayed the same. We do what we need to do to survive.
4 people like this
4 responses
• United States
10 Jun 17
Yes I get that..it is income to me. I would be going all the time if I could, but income, not my generation dictates what I do.
1 person likes this
• United States
10 Jun 17
Absolutely, I am too broke now to go to these places. My generation don't dictate what I do individually either.
1 person likes this
• United States
10 Jun 17
@librarygeek1980 I think most of us are that way to heck with generational identity and more to do with what we can afford.
2 people like this
• United States
10 Jun 17
@TiarasOceanView agreed, it's tough to afford much of anything extra anymore, no matter where you live or what generation you're from.
1 person likes this
@NJChicaa (127127)
• United States
10 Jun 17
Maybe the blame should be in the face that the food is $hit
1 person likes this
@NJChicaa (127127)
• United States
10 Jun 17
@librarygeek1980 it is horrific
1 person likes this
• United States
10 Jun 17
That too I agree, most of the food there has gone mainstream, plus once you have gotten a taste of local and cultural foods, I can't go back to these places.
1 person likes this
@GardenGerty (169449)
• United States
10 Jun 17
Great analysis. I live in a really small town, so any time we eat out, add the cost of a thirty minute or more drive. I do not care for chain restaurants, mostly, unless we are traveling. It seems easy to say "let's eat out" but the cost of our time, our gas and then the cost of the food makes it a luxury we need to put on the shelf. I love your frugality by the way.
1 person likes this
• United States
10 Jun 17
Absolutely, im in a smaller town myself, and the only time I eat out is just on coupons. The cost just gets eaten. And thanks, I have to be frugal just due to how much I can afford. I was raised frugal, due to the fact my dad was out of work most of the time.
@JohnRoberts (109841)
• Los Angeles, California
10 Jun 17
I read that same article. You are right in that costs are so high. That $15 you mention is just one person. Times that by two and if you have kids....
1 person likes this
• United States
10 Jun 17
Oh lord, the last time I took all of us, me plus my three kids, it ended up costing close to $60 aint got no time for that anymore.
1 person likes this