Lettuce under the pillow.

Pixabay image.
@Kandae11 (57233)
July 1, 2018 6:17pm CST
Sixteen children or more, whether you wanted to have them or not!. Those married ladies of old didn't have it easy - and weren't given much choice - especially when religious beliefs deemed the use of contraceptive methods sinful. It was either abstinence or one pregnancy after another. In the historical novel "To Defy a King" by Elizabeth Chadwick - there is a chapter where a few married ladies discussed methods they had tried in order to protect themselves from the constant child bearing . One such method was the placing of lettuce under the pillow - with the expected result that the husband would be less amorous. However, the lady who made the suggestion admitted that she had tried it and it was unsuccessful. Isn't it great to be living in the 21st century ? My grandmother had nine children , my mother four - and I would have settled for four at the most if my marriage had lasted. Would you want to have sixteen children ? What would be your ideal number?
32 people like this
33 responses
@LadyDuck (502148)
• Italy
2 Jul 18
I can imagine that lettuce under pillow was not very effective. My maternal grandmother had 18 children, my grandmother 5 and my mom only 2... I had none.
6 people like this
@Kandae11 (57233)
2 Jul 18
Eighteen children! - all single births? Maybe twins or quadruplets among them.
6 people like this
@Kandae11 (57233)
2 Jul 18
@LadyDuck Awesome!
3 people like this
@Kandae11 (57233)
2 Jul 18
@LadyDuck All that child bearing, and she lived a long life.
1 person likes this
• Defuniak Springs, Florida
2 Jul 18
My mother had one. My maternal grandmother had three and her mother had 14.
4 people like this
@Kandae11 (57233)
2 Jul 18
No twins or triplets in the 14?
2 people like this
• Preston, England
2 Jul 18
My ideal number of kids is none - I like my peace and quiet too much
Skip navigation Sign in Search Loading... Close Yeah, keep it Undo Close Watch QueueQueueWatch QueueQueue The next video is startingstop Loading... Watch Queue Queue __count__/__total__ Loading... YouTube Premium Loading... Get YouTube without the ads. Wo
2 people like this
• Preston, England
2 Jul 18
@Kandae11 That's when I'd be happy to meet them, when they turn 20
2 people like this
@Kandae11 (57233)
2 Jul 18
They will grow up eventually.
2 people like this
@Kandae11 (57233)
2 Jul 18
2 people like this
• United States
2 Jul 18
My grandmother had four, my mother three (with atleast two abortions and a miscarriage). My great grandparents on all sides had many children. I had one marriage and zero children. I'm not married now, and by the time I next enter a relationship (if i ever do), I don't know that I'll have children. I'd rather have several dogs, a few cats and a good relationship.
2 people like this
• United States
2 Jul 18
@Kandae11 I think the majority of us grow up wanting children because that is what we are conditioned to want. Then when we don't, or can't, have them we feel as if we are somehow a failure.
1 person likes this
@Kandae11 (57233)
2 Jul 18
@ScribbledAdNauseum No one should feel that way. If it is a case where one can't have children , and want them - there is always adoption. If one can have children, but would prefer not to have them - then it is best not to. It is awful for a child to grow up feeling unloved .
@Kandae11 (57233)
2 Jul 18
It depends on what you want out of life. Having a good relationship would be great.
1 person likes this
@kobesbuddy (78833)
• East Tawas, Michigan
2 Jul 18
My one grandma had seven children and my aunt&uncle had 14 kids!(all single births)
3 people like this
@kobesbuddy (78833)
• East Tawas, Michigan
2 Jul 18
@Kandae11 I went through child birth twice and thought that was a big deal! LOL
1 person likes this
@Kandae11 (57233)
2 Jul 18
@kobesbuddy My plan was four - twins two times.
1 person likes this
@Kandae11 (57233)
2 Jul 18
Wow! I can't imagine going through pregnancy and childbirth 14 times
3 people like this
@FayeHazel (40230)
• United States
2 Jul 18
Oh dear. I'm so happy I don't live back then. Mostly because 0 is the ideal number of children for me. Nothing against kids, but I have had to be a caretaker for my dad since I was a kid. I don't want to do it again. I've already dealt with issues parents do - only I've had to do it since I was very young and now even. That and I just don't feel I would be a good mom to them. It seems sort of self centered of the men. To put their wives through that over and over and over and over again just for a few moments of selfish pleasure.
2 people like this
@Kandae11 (57233)
2 Jul 18
Some men who did not want to burden their wives - kept mistresses. And I suppose some wives were happy about that.
2 people like this
• India
3 Jul 18
@Kandae11 there is the PS Buck novel ..Pavilion of Women which deals with this
2 people like this
@FayeHazel (40230)
• United States
3 Jul 18
@Kandae11 Ha ha, yes I do wonder if there were some relief on the case of some wives
1 person likes this
@1hopefulman (45111)
• Canada
2 Jul 18
16 would be a lot! I only have two and I am happy with that.
2 people like this
@1hopefulman (45111)
• Canada
3 Jul 18
@Kandae11 I would need a big house and a big yard. That would not be a family but a small village.
2 people like this
@Kandae11 (57233)
2 Jul 18
Imagine having twenty.
2 people like this
@allknowing (153544)
• India
2 Jul 18
In the good old days for men producing children was the only entertainment And for women it was a sin to refuse.
2 people like this
@allknowing (153544)
• India
2 Jul 18
@Kandae11 We were a brood of nine and from what we could see our parents were very happy with each other.
2 people like this
@Kandae11 (57233)
2 Jul 18
You are right, they couldn't refuse. However, those husbands who were thoughtful of their wives abstained or sought 'entertainment' elsewhere.
2 people like this
@Kandae11 (57233)
2 Jul 18
@allknowing My mother's husband was chosen for her - and I don't think they were very happy.
2 people like this
@BelleStarr (61463)
• United States
2 Jul 18
I would have had 6 had I been able. I did have 5 pregnancies, 3 live babies, 1 stillborn and 1 miscarriage and after 3 c-sections, the doctor said no more. I was very sad, I always wanted a large family. I am one of 7 and my mother is one of 10.
2 people like this
@Kandae11 (57233)
2 Jul 18
Six would have beem okay - and no doubt they would be loved and well cared for.
2 people like this
@BelleStarr (61463)
• United States
2 Jul 18
@Kandae11 My daughter has 5 and it is wonderful so I would have loved to have had those extras.
2 people like this
@rakski (156200)
• Philippines
2 Jul 18
No way! That is way too much for a mom and a woman. It will always be the woman's health at stake in pregnancy. Do you have kids?
2 people like this
@Kandae11 (57233)
2 Jul 18
I have one son - four would have been my limit. Many ladies in those days lost their lives during childbirth - mostly because medical techniques were less advanced in those days.
1 person likes this
@rakski (156200)
• Philippines
2 Jul 18
@Kandae11 I totally agree with you. Also lack of knowledge and education. At least you have a son. One out of three. I have two. That is enough for us
2 people like this
@Kandae11 (57233)
2 Jul 18
@rakski Yes it is.
2 people like this
@just4him (323168)
• Green Bay, Wisconsin
2 Jul 18
When I was a kid, I wanted a dozen. That changed after I was married. I was glad to settle for three.
2 people like this
@just4him (323168)
• Green Bay, Wisconsin
2 Jul 18
@Kandae11 I agree, though I would have liked more children.
2 people like this
@Kandae11 (57233)
2 Jul 18
Three is a good enough number.
2 people like this
@thelme55 (79311)
• Germany
2 Jul 18
I have not heard about that lettuce method. I would have love to have 3 but I am only blessed with one. So be it.
2 people like this
@thelme55 (79311)
• Germany
2 Jul 18
@Kandae11 me either.
@Kandae11 (57233)
2 Jul 18
I would have never imagined lettuce being used for that purpose.
1 person likes this
@YrNemo (20254)
2 Jul 18
In my impractical and naive days, (pre-marriage), I had thought of having 4 as the max (or was it minimum? ). Glad that I have much less than that. Religious or not, I think it is insane to not having some sort of contraceptive ways. (Guess I am not religious then? )
2 people like this
@Kandae11 (57233)
2 Jul 18
In those days, the sole duty for women was to produce children and mind the home.
2 people like this
@YrNemo (20254)
3 Jul 18
1 person likes this
@Jessabuma (31696)
• Baguio, Philippines
2 Jul 18
I would love to have 2 or 3 .. hehehe!!! 16 is too much for me..
2 people like this
@Kandae11 (57233)
2 Jul 18
Even if I had twins or triplets, I won't be able to care for so many.
1 person likes this
@Jessabuma (31696)
• Baguio, Philippines
3 Jul 18
@Kandae11 yes me too
@marguicha (230334)
• Chile
2 Jul 18
My ideal number was and is 2. I would have ended insane with more children.
2 people like this
@Kandae11 (57233)
2 Jul 18
I would hate having to accept one pregnancy after another and watch my body become worn out.
1 person likes this
@marlina (154103)
• Canada
2 Jul 18
Unfortunately, my aunt was one of the "unlucky" ladies who bore 16 children (on a farm) and my Mom had it "a little easier" as she had 6 children. I had the perfect number: 2 wonderful sons. Exactly what I wished for.
2 people like this
@Kandae11 (57233)
2 Jul 18
Did she have twins or triplets among that 16? I think if both parties want to have a great number of children and they can afford to - then they should go right ahead. However the ladies I am talking about had little choice in the matter.
1 person likes this
@DianneN (254949)
• United States
3 Jul 18
Ha Ha! Lettuce certainly wouldn't work. Most of our family only had two children each except for my mother. She had three. I am very happy with the two sons we were blessed with. Children are very expensive to raise. lol
1 person likes this
@DianneN (254949)
• United States
3 Jul 18
@Kandae11 If she put the lettuce somewhere else, she may have had a fighting chance.
1 person likes this
@Kandae11 (57233)
3 Jul 18
I really can't see how lettuce could have worked.
1 person likes this
@Kandae11 (57233)
4 Jul 18
@DianneN possibly, yes.
@JudyEv (381739)
• Rockingham, Australia
2 Jul 18
It must have been dreadful in those days. I cannot imagine trying to cope with more than a few.
2 people like this
@Kandae11 (57233)
2 Jul 18
Same here.
1 person likes this
@HazySue (39265)
• Gouverneur, New York
2 Jul 18
I would have never made it out alive way back then.
2 people like this
@Kandae11 (57233)
2 Jul 18
Me neither.
2 people like this
@nela13 (59367)
• Portugal
3 Jul 18
I love my children but I think sixteen was too much, thank God we live in the 21st century. I have two but sometimes I wish I could have another one
1 person likes this
@nela13 (59367)
• Portugal
5 Jul 18
@Kandae11 How many do you have?
1 person likes this
@Kandae11 (57233)
5 Jul 18
@nela13 One boy. My marriage didn't work out - and I had no plans to get married again.
1 person likes this
@Kandae11 (57233)
3 Jul 18
I would have settled for four.
1 person likes this