Service Animal Confusion

By DB
@dgobucks226 (37621)
December 24, 2018 5:02pm CST
Experts say the Americans with Disabilities Act, or ADA, allows people to bring service animals to hospitals and emergency rooms and many other venues. Recently a woman who visited an emergency room in New Jersey (U.S.) with a service dog was told she could not keep the animal there. Why did this happen? It seems legitimately disabled people have been put in an extremely tough situation because of so many selfish pet owners who want to bring their pets with them everywhere. These despicable people are willing to lie to bring their pets along with them wherever they go. They will claim falsely that their pet is an emotional support animal. This increasingly ridiculous behavior makes it more difficult for genuinely disabled people who actually need to have these service animals with them. Clearly the selfish who fake dogs and other animals as service or support animals could hinder the needy 's rights as it did in this woman's case. It needs to stop. With so many instances of people coming out of the woodwork to deceitfully take advantage of this law, a stricter identification system may be required. What are your thoughts? Is there a more effective way to protect the rights of the disabled? Source- New Jersey 101.5 Photo-nj.com
5 people like this
5 responses
@amadeo (111937)
• United States
24 Dec 18
that is sad to hear but not surprised what is going on in the world of ours.Things are changing so bad I am glad that will be not around for all of this.Our generation was the best.Today not so.
2 people like this
@dgobucks226 (37621)
27 Dec 18
I see more and more of this with dogs in stores. People just carry them in like a child?
@Hannihar (130150)
• Israel
29 Jan 19
@HeatherLader I feel that the handicapped get screwed anywhere but in this case it is not right what others are doing to them.
1 person likes this
@Hannihar (130150)
• Israel
30 Jan 19
@dgobucks226 Thanks.
1 person likes this
@dgobucks226 (37621)
30 Jan 19
Absolutely!
1 person likes this
@just4him (323168)
• Green Bay, Wisconsin
28 Dec 18
I agree. In some cases an animal as an emotional support animal is necessary, but keep them to dogs or common pets. No need to go to the extreme with peacocks. Those are the fake ones who go to the extreme and make it hard for people who need them. Stricter guidelines are needed and we'll most likely see them soon. At least I hope so.
@JudyEv (382052)
• Rockingham, Australia
26 Dec 18
I think somehow the authorities need to tighten the laws on service animals. Like political correctedness, it's getting beyond a joke.
1 person likes this
@dgobucks226 (37621)
27 Dec 18
Possibly a massive fine would be a deterrent. Also an ID carrying system. Thanks for your response.
1 person likes this
@Courage7 (19626)
• United States
31 Dec 18
Such a crazy world we live in.
1 person likes this
@dgobucks226 (37621)
31 Dec 18
It seems to me either some people think laws/rules don't apply to them or else they are entitled to bend them...
1 person likes this