Why does America want to be ruled by old men?

@indexer (4852)
Leicester, England
March 4, 2020 2:47am CST
It is now looking as though the next POTUS is going to be a septuagenarian, whoever wins the election in November. The Democrat field is being whittled down to Joe Biden, who will be 77 on polling day, Bernie Sanders (79) or possibly Michael Bloomberg (78). You will have to add four years to those ages to the position they will be in when seeking re-election for their second term, should they live that long. The alternative is to vote for the comparatively youthful Donald Trump, who is a mere 74 and will only be 78 when he ends his second term. What is going on? Before the Trump era, only two previous American presidents even turned 70 when in office, namely Ronald Reagan and Dwight Eisenhower. We used to think of Reagan as a doddering old fool when he left office at the age of 77, after two terms, but that is the age which all of the Democrat candidates will have reached before they even start, should they win! Does this preference for geriatric presidential candidates have something to do with the fact that the people who actually vote in American elections are much more likely to be old than young? In 2016, 71% of voters aged 65+ cast a ballot, whereas only 46% of those aged 18 to 29 did so. Have the younger generations simply lost faith in the political system and left the field wide open for the greyheads to play their inconsequential games?
7 people like this
6 responses
@JudyEv (382483)
• Rockingham, Australia
4 Mar 20
Maybe any of the younger men have too much sense to want to govern. I think anyone would age quickly in such an environment.
2 people like this
@indexer (4852)
• Leicester, England
4 Mar 20
There was a much younger man in the field, namely Pete Buttegieg, but he couldn't garner enough support. Let's also remember that there are a few women in the race as well, but they don't look likely to succeed either.
1 person likes this
@xFiacre (14800)
• Ireland
4 Mar 20
@indexer Interesting. Boris is 55, Theresa is now 63, Cameron is now 53.
2 people like this
@JudyEv (382483)
• Rockingham, Australia
4 Mar 20
@xFiacre At least they are younger than the Americans. Our Prime Minister is 51, and apparently that is the average age of Australian politicians.
1 person likes this
@LadyDuck (502759)
• Italy
4 Mar 20
I think that in the United States only those who can collect plenty of public money can run for President, it is a weird system that they have.
2 people like this
@LadyDuck (502759)
• Italy
4 Mar 20
@indexer It is surely a country where money is seen of the only important feature to have to be elected President.
@indexer (4852)
• Leicester, England
4 Mar 20
It is certainly a country that worships money and its citizens have the weird idea that if you are filthy rich you will be a good politician. It probably accounts for the general attitude they have that governments have no role in alleviating the distress of poor people.
1 person likes this
@RebeccasFarm (91297)
• United States
4 Mar 20
I dont want that I think they are doddery old farts
@JohnRoberts (109841)
• Los Angeles, California
4 Mar 20
Part of the answer is that at that age they have acquired enormous wealth, power and influence that younger politicians have yet to establish.
1 person likes this
@indexer (4852)
• Leicester, England
4 Mar 20
So what you end up with is both a plutocracy - government by the rich - and a gerontocracy - government by the elderly. To what extent these count as democracy is a matter for debate!
1 person likes this
@mrki444 (15162)
• Croatia (Hrvatska)
4 Mar 20
Why never young people don't have chance on elections?
@sh2ker (503)
• Bury, England
4 Mar 20
I think you’re right it makes sense that the politicians are representative of the people who vote. Though from my understanding of American politics Bernie Sanders is popular with younger voters. The youth do tend to be more idealistic.
1 person likes this