Is it time to reduce the transition time between US Presidents?

Tweet

It is laid down in the US Constitution that there must be a period of 11 weeks between an election being held and the new President being sworn in. Hence the huge gap between 3rd November and 20th January, when all sorts of shenanigans can take place - not usually the case, but certainly true on this occasion! The reasons for such a long transition go back to a very different era, when transport was much slower, there was no electronic communication, and change necessarily took a long time. But surely those conditions have changed so much that a long Transition is no longer either needed or desirable? Other democratic countries often have transition periods, but they are nothing like as long as that in the US. In the UK there is no transition period at all. As soon as it is known that a general election has been lost - often the day following the vote - the losing Prime Minister tenders his/her resignation and the leader of the winning party makes a trip to Buck House to "kiss hands" and take up their place in Downing Street. There is often a hurried arrival of removal vans at No 10! The business of forming a government then takes place in the days following - the new PM invites certain colleagues to No 10 and they leave a few minutes later to announce what job they have been given. It is all very quick and civilised - the contrast with the American version could hardly be more stark - I know which one I reckon works better!