Inclusive sizing
By NJ Chicaa
@NJChicaa (122744)
United States
November 24, 2023 12:50pm CST
Well that is now what UnderArmour is calling "plus sizes". 
Like the big folks know that they are large and it isn't like it is a secret. "Inclusive sizing"? Give me a break.
I was looking on their website for gifts for my BIL and stuff for myself. I had to laugh when I saw a label for "inclusive sizing" though. I'm able to just wear their XL women's size now which is fine with me. (they size things small) I don't need the plus sizes which is a good thing.
Like the big folks know that they are large and it isn't like it is a secret. "Inclusive sizing"? Give me a break.
I was looking on their website for gifts for my BIL and stuff for myself. I had to laugh when I saw a label for "inclusive sizing" though. I'm able to just wear their XL women's size now which is fine with me. (they size things small) I don't need the plus sizes which is a good thing.7 people like this
6 responses
@DWDavis (25809)
• United States
24 Nov 23
This reminds me of the stories of how women's dress sizes morphed over time from the 1930s to the 2010s.
A size 14 in 1937 miraculously became a size 8 in 1967 and by 2011 was a size 0.
You can read more about it here.
https://glamourdaze.com/2016/10/a-short-history-of-womens-dress-sizes.html
1 person likes this
@RasmaSandra (84712)
• Daytona Beach, Florida
24 Nov 23
When I do buy clothing with tops and pants I love getting the XXL sizes because of how comfortable they are on me,
1 person likes this
@LindaOHio (188173)
• United States
25 Nov 23
That's getting as bad as the gender thing. Maybe they don't want to offend people by calling them plus sizes. Have a good weekend.
