The Whole Truth and Nothing but the Truth

@porwest (78759)
United States
February 11, 2024 7:02am CST
Finally, an important piece of the report released by special counsel Robert Hur tells a different story than the Biden administration was trying to sell in their recent press conference over it. They kept emphasizing the report saying no charges will be brought and therefore seeming to conclude that Joe Biden did nothing wrong with the classified documents he had. Granted, White House counsel spokesman Ian Sams did encourage reporters asking many questions about the report to, "Read the report." But the way that the White House was spinning the conclusions was a bit misleading. In fact, it was more than misleading. The report did not say Biden was not guilty of a crime. What it said was, "No charges will be brought against Biden." If you only read that part, or only focus on that part, you can spin the idea that nothing wrong happened. What Robert Hur actually concluded in this regard was that it would be difficult to get a conviction and therefore no charges would be filed. But not because Biden wasn't guilty of actually committing a crime according to their findings. In the report it read verbatim, "We have also considered that, at trial, Mr. Biden would likely present himself to a jury, as he did during our interview of him, as a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory." He went on to say, "Based on our direct interactions with and observations of him, he is someone for whom many jurors will want to identify reasonable doubt. It would be difficult to convince a jury that they should convict him — by then a former president well into his eighties — of a serious felony that requires a mental state of willfulness." In other words, Hur is saying he believes Biden committed a serious felony and that Biden did do it willingly. Or, more importantly, that he believes this is likely the case. Anyone is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law, and I will reflect that opinion in my own commentary. The point of this post is not to attempt to shed Joe Biden in a bad light or even to accuse him of anything. It is to illustrate how the news media and the administration will twist the truth as much as they can in order to convey a message that does not necessarily tell the whole truth. As Americas weigh in on the election as it draws nearer, I continue to believe that we cannot trust the media. We have to dig deeper into anything they try to tell us. Regarding Trump, or regarding Biden. In other words, we can't just take anyone's word for it. The truth is always somewhere in the middle. And I think it is more important than ever to actually look for it. Because few people have a desire to tell it to you. They are not necessarily lying all the time. They are simply picking out the pieces that they want you to see to draw a conclusion they have painted for you. We always say, "We want voters to be informed." The problem is that many voters are only informed by the media, and unfortunately the information presented by the media is not necessarily the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. Robert Hur's report and the way it is being "reported" on is simply another example of that, that I feel is important to point out.
3 people like this
4 responses
@NJChicaa (116040)
• United States
11 Feb
The report also states that there is no evidence or not much. Prosecutors don’t bring cases that they don’t feel they can wi.
3 people like this
@porwest (78759)
• United States
11 Feb
Please point me to where it says that in the report. I have not seen a single report of the report that suggested that. I am not disputing what you are saying. I am simply asserting I have not seen the report characterized that way. I have read, "No charges will be filed," and of course the statement I presented here in this post. And the statement I presented here clearly suggests, "We have evidence of a crime, but we are not convinced we can convince a jury of it who would not be sympathetic to the president considering his age and demeanor." To me that does not suggest, "We have no evidence."
@NJChicaa (116040)
• United States
11 Feb
@porwest If they had a significant amount of evidence they likely would have pressed charges or recommended it whenever Biden's term ends. I honestly am not going to read 375 pages of the report to find the line about them saying that there wasn't much evidence. Sorry. It is my day off and I'm still half asleep.
2 people like this
@porwest (78759)
• United States
11 Feb
@NJChicaa At the same time, who's justice department is it? That's an important thing to consider. My take on the issue is this; both the Biden and Trump cases are without merit largely. Classified documents being "accidentally or unwillingly removed" during fast paced transitions is SO common the government has FAQ pages fully devoted to what to do and how to deal with it. It's part of the reason I have a problem with the cases pursued against Trump over his documents. HE was gone after with a vengeance in a way no one before him ever has been, and therefore it calls into question the validity of the pursuit and the reasoning behind it. One KEY issue is this; a president CAN remove classified documents and without any formal process DECLASSIFY documents. A vice president does not have this authority nor authorization. These documents are from when Biden was vice president. Not the president.
• Northampton, England
11 Feb
It would be ironic if no charges due to him forgetting he had those files in his garage .I suspect they are one of many duplicates that he didnt bother to send back , a presidential practice going back to Lincoln
1 person likes this
@porwest (78759)
• United States
12 Feb
No one ever suggested that it is uncommon for classified documents to be gathered in error when fast-paced transitions occur, and things are just willy nilly boxed up as quickly as possible. I think to suggest Biden is completely off the hook is a bit of a stretch. But here's the thing...if I disagree with prosecuting Trump I can't agree with prosecuting Biden. But BECAUSE they set a PRECEDENT with Trump... I have to rethink my position on that. It also suggests to me that someone should have reminded Biden before the witch hunts went into full swing that he ought to make sure all of his own ducks are in a row before he accuses anyone else of anything and goes after them for it.
@BabeSays (8576)
• Mauritius
14 Feb
I don't know anything about that.
1 person likes this
@porwest (78759)
• United States
14 Feb
It does not surprise me.
1 person likes this
• Cloverdale, Indiana
11 Feb
I say the truth is the ONLY way to be heard & why the media isn't letting people know is cause they want B, to stay in office & we that have been watching knows he's not fit to be a pres. Fox said they wouldn't let him feed their fish or their dogs cause he's not fit or able to, & that right there isn't good we all know he's not fit, he's not able to be a president. You read some other post about this & you will see some are totally against trump being pres & he's the BEST 1 that can & WILL fix what B has put the nation in danger.
1 person likes this
@porwest (78759)
• United States
14 Feb
I really don't believe for a second that those supporting Biden are being rational in their decision to do that, and I also do not believe they have a real grasp of who Biden really is and have no idea how bad he has ruined this country. Or they DO, and just don't care. MANY liberals hate the country.