Democrats and Liberals Continue to Crusade for Illegal Immigrants

Tweet

The Radical Left and a portion of the Democratic Party continues its "insurrection" against federal and local police enforcing the law. More moderate Democrats have remained silent. From what I've been reading there have been many examples of this continued resistance with apparently (for now) no end in sight. Why do Democrats continue to support a losing issue, wanting to keep illegal immigrants in the U.S. The Democratic Party approval rating is at an all-time low, yet they continue this crusade even though the majority of U.S. citizens voted in favor of removing illegal aliens and stopping the flow of illegal migration into our country. Could it be their recruiting these migrants as future Democrat votes? Are Liberal Leadership Really Undermining Law Enforcement? Well, you won't see it reported in depth in your nightly news, but here are a few of the incidents reported by alternative news outlets: 1. Citizens and non-citizens have physically clashed with ICE agents and police in cities like Los Angeles, Chicago, Boston and New York. -These law enforcement officials are arresting "illegal aliens mostly violent and criminal offenders and are only doing their jobs. ICE knows the illegals they are seeking; they are not rounding up documented legal citizens as the "legacy media" insinuates. 2. Judges have gotten into the act, defying federal law by hiding illegals and obstructing agents. -An arrest and charges were brought against Judge Hannah Dugan in Wisconsin. She was indicted by a federal grand jury in May 2025 for obstruction and concealing an illegal immigrant from arrest. -An arrest of former Judge Joel Cano in New Mexico in April 2025, along with his wife for harboring an illegal alien with ties to Tren de Aragua (a dangerous criminal gang). 3. A female Democrat legislator charged with physically assaulting an ICE agent at a migrant detention facility in NJ. The news media tried to paint this as congressional oversight, but they arrived unannounced to create a photo op. The legislator's pretense of poor conditions in the facility had not been proven. 4. A California Senator verbally interrupting a live Homeland Security news event without identifying himself or having his Senate security pin on. He did not comply with officer's commands to back off when he moved toward Secretary Noem. -What mainstream media did not report was his disrespectful behavior and political theatre, and the fact that Secretary Noem did meet with him after the conference in a more private setting for 15 minutes to discuss his concerns. These are just a few of the incidents I've come across... When our political representatives encourage or stay silent to violent and inappropriate actions as some in the Democratic leadership did, it sends a bad message that disobeying the law is an acceptable practice. It's a "bad look" to support issues the majority of the country does not agree with. Why do they continue? Are they suffering from TDS too. Perhaps! Questions of the Day: Should our political leaders and the judiciary get personally involved to the point of encouraging violence, obstructing federal laws and aiding convicted criminals? Should the Dems admit they made a mistake on their immigration policy? What is acceptable intervention/behavior?