Made in America Again—Maybe.
By Jim Bauer
@porwest (111440)
United States
September 16, 2025 8:21am CST
We talk endlessly about solving poverty in this country—so you'd think, despite the hurdles, more Americans (especially on the left) would be celebrating tariffs as a tool for change.
Or, in reality, going back to the way things were.
But we've grown so accustomed to taxes, we've forgotten there's another lever to pull. The default assumption is tax more, fix more. Yet the hard truth is, you can't tax your way out of every problem. The math simply doesn't hold.
Just for perspective, if you seized every dollar from the nation's wealthiest individuals, it would only keep the government running for about eight months.
I said we should be celebrating a return to how things used to be. Before 1943, there was no federal income tax as we know it. That system was born out of wartime necessity—designed to fund World War II. But once the revenue started flowing, it didn't stop. The government found news ways to spend, especially in the postwar boom.
So, how did we fund the country before that shift? Mostly through tariffs. And if there was a tax, it was a modest 3%—paid quarterly, not siphoned off your paycheck before you even saw it.
But something else was different back then—our jobs. We were an industrial powerhouse with factories lining city blocks from coast to coast. We built things. And because we built things, wages were solid. A single income could support a family, buy a home, and still leave room for dignity and a little fun.
Then came the shift. Slow at first. But by the 1970s, it was in full swing. We wanted cheaper goods, so we opened the floodgates to imports. For a while it seemed like a win. We still had our jobs, and now we had cheaper stuff.
But the tide turned. Corporations realized they could chase bigger profits by moving production overseas—to China, Indonesia, the Philippines and Taiwan. The factories followed the money.
And the American worker? They were left behind. High paying manufacturing jobs gave way to lower wage retail and service work. The backbone of the middle class began to buckle.
Poverty has risen since the 1970s. If globalization had real benefits for the average American, they've been hard to spot. Cheap started as a novelty. Now it's a survival strategy.
Trump's new wave of tariffs may not be enough to dismantle the IRS or return us to the pre-income tax era. We've spent too much and borrowed too long. It'll take generations to unwind that tab. But what these tariffs can do is reignite something we haven't seen in over half a century.
A reason to build again. And with it, a rise in wages.
We're already seeing the early signs it could work. The conversation is no longer theoretical. It's on the table. We're not talking about ending poverty. Tariffs can't do that. But they can rebuild the backbone of the American middle class. It can open the doors wide to allow for stable, well paying jobs rooted in domestic industry.
Major players are stepping up with big bucks in hand. Johnson & Johnson has pledged $55 billion toward U.S. manufacturing. SoftBank plans to invest $100 billion and create 100,000 jobs. Taiwan Semiconductor is putting $165 billion into chip production on American soil. Apple is committing $500 billion to domestic manufacturing, including a major partnership with Corning.
This isn't just policy, it's a pivot. From outsourcing to reinvesting. From cheap to sustainable. From survival to strength.
At their core, these tariffs are about jobs. Not just the $15 an hour kind, but real jobs. Jobs with solid wages, meaningful benefits, and the power to support a family. Family supporting work that could help rebuild not just the economy, but the foundation of stronger families and enduring values.
Picture a world where one income covers the bills. Where parents raise their own children. Where work isn't just a grind to survive, but a path toward a future.
That's the vision Trump is aiming for. Not just cheaper goods, but a richer life. Not just policy, but possibility.
4 people like this
3 responses
@dgobucks226 (37008)
•
24 Sep
I had read the Federal Income Tax was created during Woodrow Wilson's (a Democrat) Presidency in 1913. It became part of the 16th Amendment. But I understand your point. It created a federal piggy bank for Congress to dip into to fund pet projects for both parties.
Another point you made I like is a good one and confirmed by some economists. America's decline can be traced to us becoming an importer rather than an exporter of goods. Businesses located overseas. We stopped building our products here. Why? Because Democrats imposed such high corporate taxes on businesses in the U.S. they relocated to other countries with more favorable conditions.
Trump has wisely made tax conditions more favorable for corporations (lower tax rates) to build factories here and will provide tax credits on American made products. This will unleash an economic boom and as you so rightfully state, create real paying jobs with a meaningful future.
1 person likes this

@dgobucks226 (37008)
•
24 Sep
@porwest Nicely said and explained! Yes, you can ask Former U.S. Senator Bob Menendez about that. Now serving an 11- year sentence for keeping those gold bars and other goodies for using his position to grant political favors to Egypt. I believe that is called corruption and the gains needed to be reported to the IRS.
1 person likes this
@dgobucks226 (37008)
•
27 Sep
@porwest Ha, ha. Not surprising. The Climate Czar who flew on a polluting PRIVATE JET to spread the word about the evils of oil and gas and its destruction of the environment. 

1 person likes this
@porwest (111440)
• United States
26 Sep
@dgobucks226 I do recall a story back in the day about Kerry when he was a senator. In his own state he pushed for a luxury tax, and as soon as it passed, he moved his yacht to a state without one. lol
Irony in motion...
1 person likes this

@FourWalls (80482)
• United States
16 Sep
As a music geek, I remember the days in the 70s when the RIAA (Recording Industry Association of America) pushed for a tariff on import records, which people were buying for (a) better quality, (b) more/different songs, and/or (c) the band wasn’t signed in America. They got it. And music geeks paid it because UK releases were there and the U.S. version was not.
Semi-related: I saw an interesting headline on CNN (hardly a “right-wind mouthpiece”), and AP reported it too: the economy was much weaker in 2024 than was reported.
1 person likes this




