Women in the Victorian Era ~ The Image of Women in the Victorian Era

@celticeagle (190157)
Boise, Idaho
January 7, 2026 1:01pm CST
Every step, every breath, and every word were all set by certain rules of conduct. These rules dictated how they should dress, how they should think, even what they should feel. The female mind was considered a threat. Societies ideal image of a woman was that of a weak, submissive and completely powerless entity where any attempt at individuality was unheard of. The body of the woman was tightly laced up and kept away from prying eyes. The mere desire to do something alone such as go for a walk or have lunch in a restaurant by herself could permanently scar her reputation. But what was lifelike for the young women after the debutante ball? She has found a suitor and now what?
5 people like this
4 responses
@just4him (323168)
• Green Bay, Wisconsin
7 Jan
I'm glad I don't live in that era.
2 people like this
@celticeagle (190157)
• Boise, Idaho
7 Jan
Me too. I'd have gotten in a lot of trouble.
2 people like this
@Fleura (35192)
• United Kingdom
7 Jan
The funny thing is that we talk about 'the Victorians', 'the Georgians' and all the rest as if they were different people, foreigners... it sounds mad to tell you that I only recently really put two and two together and really understood that my grandparents were Victorians; my great-great-grandparents were Georgians. And I have to tell you that my grandmother was definitely not weak or submissive. Neither was her mother nor any of her relatives. Yes they were limited in what they were allowed to achieve, but within those bounds they did well. They ran businesses, travelled to India and Australia, one was a headmistress. They were never debutantes, only the landed gentry experienced that, and they couldn't go for lunch in a restaurant alone or in company because there were none!
1 person likes this
@celticeagle (190157)
• Boise, Idaho
8 Jan
We do? Were they in London or another city? That could have something to do with it. London society was very strict. Other cities may not have been. What you are describing doesn't sound like women of the Victorian Era which was from 1837 until 1901.They couldn't own a business. It was all in the man's name.
1 person likes this
@celticeagle (190157)
• Boise, Idaho
9 Jan
@Fleura .......Yes, they did. They were cheap labor in so many instances. Some had similar celebrations as the debutante balls. Just not as fancy. They still go on today.
1 person likes this
@Fleura (35192)
• United Kingdom
9 Jan
@celticeagle I agree they couldn't own a business, but they played a big part in running family businesses (which most businesses were then). And in some cases they were running what we would nowadays call a business - my mother's two aunts, for example (sisters who were not married) ran a guest house. No they didn't live in London nor in any other city, they lived in small villages on the whole or in market towns. I know when the Victorian era was; my grandparents were born in the 1870s and 80s. Debutantes were only from the upper classes, ordinary people didn't have that experience.
1 person likes this
@JudyEv (382925)
• Rockingham, Australia
8 Jan
The lucky ones would have their own household to run I guess.
1 person likes this
@celticeagle (190157)
• Boise, Idaho
8 Jan
Yes, funny how they ran a household but supposedly had no sense for anything else.
1 person likes this
@LindaOHio (223158)
• United States
9 Jan
Today's world has a lot of problems; but I'm glad a woman has more freedom these days.
1 person likes this
@celticeagle (190157)
• Boise, Idaho
9 Jan
If you can call it that. They've had so many taken away recently.
1 person likes this