Flags burnt on vet graves, replaced with swastikas

Saddam didn't claim to have weapons of mass destruction. He did in the 90's, but many believe he was misslead by his men, because they were too fearful to tell him otherwise, and so his weapon's capabilities were exaggerated. However, in the 90's UK and US forces went into Iraq and destroyed the WMD. Then in 2003 the Bush Administration claimed to have inteligence that proved Saddam had WMD and weapons making capabilites. Saddam said that this wasn't true and allowed UN inspectors into Iraq. The inspectors found nothing. The Bush administration threatened to bomb Iraq, but the UN suggested strongly against it and said it would be illegal. Bush's administration took America and the US to war there anyway. They found no weapons or anything and still havn't found any. That's why so many people think the war is illegal and all the stuff about WMD was a big exaggeration made by the Bush Administration who just wanted to go into Iraq to bring about regime change.

4ftfingers: We also had a ceasefire agreement with Iraq that Hussein continuously broke. Isn't it the responsibility of the parties involved in a ceasefire agreement, so enfore the terms of that agreement?

I think Saddam did have weapons of mass destruction. What about the mobile biological lab that they captured and the high background radiation in that underground bunker? Saddam probably managed to get most of the actual weapons across the border into Syria and destroyed the rest. After all, it's not like he didn't have any warning that we were coming.