The Rest of the Story

United States
July 22, 2008 9:54pm CST
I just watched a story on World News Tonight about Ford Motor Company's major losses. Of course, Ford would like to blame it all on the oil/gas crisis but there is another side to the story. Last year, Ford decided to become a major contributor to homosexual activists attempting to force the rest of us to change our perspective on morality and, as a result, a boycott went into effect against Ford Motor Company. In spite of losing billions of dollars, Ford chose to stand by its decision to try to tell millions of Americans what is right and wrong. They did this with absolutely no regard for their employees whose income depends on their solvency. As a business woman, I think that businesses should stick to providing a service or product and stay out of our country's moral decisions. Everyone has the right to stand behind what they believe in and I have no problem with the individuals of Ford Motor Company supporting whatever they feel like, even if I disagree. However, I have a big issue with a large corporation like Ford or McDonald's or Proctor & Gamble contributing huge amounts of money to organizations attempting to sway this country's morals. Actually, if truth be told, I think that large corporations shouldn't be allowed to contribute large amounts of money to any organization or political campaign that will have a moral or economical impact on our citizens. It's like they are buying their perspective and that's a scary place for this country to be in. Our country's legislature is living proof of how scary this is because they are making decisions that affect all of our lives but they are siding with people who have no concern for the citizens of this country. If you think the politicians care anything about your life, you're crazy. The only thing the candidates are interested in you for is to get elected. They only care about themselves and what they and their buddies want. I'm not overly thrilled with either candidate for President but I do believe that McCain is the better choice for a number of reasons. I won't go into that right now because I'm getting away from my subject. The point I'll get back to is that Ford is on the brink of going under mostly because it decided to ignore conservative voices that don't want businesses telling us how to live. McDonald's and P&G might want to consider the consequences of what Ford is going through because I don't intend to use my money to buy products from companies who are promoting what I consider to be an unhealthy and unsafe lifestyle. You also might want to consider the other side of the coin on this. What if some of these major corporations decided to start supporting radical organizations that want to take away your choices and your right to believe what you believe? I don't intend to force my beliefs on anyone but I will stand up against someone who is determined to undermine parents in the way they choose to teach their children right from wrong and try to force me to be silent because I think what they are doing is wrong. I will fight for my right to freedom of speech and freedom of religion as long as I am alive. What I don't understand is why so many people in this country are willing to let one group of people try to dictate how the rest of us believe.
3 responses
@bobmnu (8157)
• United States
23 Jul 08
This is a n example of the free market working. You disagree with Ford so you buy GM or whatever. I would not support restricting a company from supporting any cause as long as it is public support. When my son was deployed to Iraq The Family Support Group asked Target Stores to help the families with a donation for their Christmas party for the children. Target said that the military was not one of the targeted originations they supported. The Gay - Lesbian Task Force was their chosen group. I did not and do not buy from Target. My choice is because they refused to support our troops. The Free Market allows people to send a message to the company with out getting violent, yet still making sure the company get the message.
• United States
23 Jul 08
You misunderstood what I said. I don't have a problem with a company giving to something that is helping families or giving Christmas presents. I'm saying that when a large company donates large amounts of money to an organization that is actively attempting to change laws that have a major impact on our country morally or financially, they shouldn't be allowed to do so. I don't know why Target wouldn't donate to something like what you describe but there may be more to it than you are aware of that had nothing to do with the children or the troops. Keep that in mind. The issue with Ford and McDonald's and P&G is specifically involved with political activists attempting to make changes to our laws to benefit a specific group of people and discriminate against another group. I have big issues with that.
@bobmnu (8157)
• United States
24 Jul 08
If Ford Motor Co can't express it's views than why can a man like George Serios spend his money to finance a political cause. I have a problem with what Ford is supporting but I choose not to buy their cars. That is thee free market and the free expression of ideas. Once you start to restrict that you are in great danger.
@snowy22315 (171176)
• United States
24 Jul 08
I don think business has any authority in telling people what to believe or how to live their lives. I don tthink any business would have the right to do that. I believe in our first amendments as well. I would not support any corportation that tried to take away those rights in any way shape or form.
@sunkissed (4330)
• United States
24 Jul 08
Well if this is the case,I can see why ford motor company is losing money. They should keep their opinions to theirselves, and just carry on business as usual.Why try to forse their views of what is right and wrong and anyone, this is not their place to do this.