Yet another Republican joins the "Enough Club"

United States
October 28, 2008 4:53pm CST
Former Republican Senator Charles Mathias has endorsed Barack Obama: "I have known John McCain for many years, even before he was first elected to the House of Representatives in 1982. And like so many other television viewers, I have come to know Barack Obama as he has made his spirited quest for the highest office in the land through this long and unprecedented campaign. Sens. Obama and McCain have vastly different backgrounds and strikingly different visions of how America should navigate these tumultuous times. For me, the decision on who should be the next president transcends private friendship or political affiliation. My decision is based on the long-range needs of our country and which of these two candidates I feel is better suited to recharge America's economic health, restore its prestige abroad and inspire anew all people who cherish freedom and equality. For me, that person is Barack Obama." -- http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/27/AR2008102702407_pf.html
1 person likes this
2 responses
• United States
28 Oct 08
I am a part of an "Enough Club" only it is I have had enough of both parties. All they do is fight, finger point and back bite and accomplish nothing but earmarks and pork barrel spending. Both sides are the problem to me now. I give up on anything good coming from this election whoever wins. Hopefully next time we will actually get some decent choices. I would like great choices but I am desperate enough to settle for decent.
1 person likes this
@minerc (1373)
• United States
28 Oct 08
For me its John McCain, I cherish my freedom and as far as equality goes if Im not willing to go out and work hard for the things I have then they shouldnt be handed to me that is not the way this country was set up its not the way God intended us to be.
• United States
28 Oct 08
Are you aware that your representation of Obama's plan directly contradict them? "I don't believe that government can or should try to solve all our problems. I know you don't either. But I do believe that government should do that which we cannot do for ourselves – protect us from harm and provide a decent education for our children; invest in new roads and new science and technology. It should reward drive and innovation and growth in the free market, but it should also make sure businesses live up to their responsibility to create American jobs, and look out for American workers, and play by the rules of the road. It should ensure a shot at success not only for those with money and power and influence, but for every single American who's willing to work." -- Barack Obama
2 people like this
@minerc (1373)
• United States
29 Oct 08
Then it simply comes down to a basic philosophic difference as to what we believe government SHOULD do for us. I believe that the governments only role is to protect us from harm, both internal and external. I need help to ensure that I am secrure in my life liberty and pursuit of happiness. I can and do educate my child, the government can set the standards, but I can educate. I believe that LOCAL government should be the ones to plan for new roads, the citizens of that area should be the ones to invest in them. Governemt does invest in science and technology. But so does the private sector. Usually the private sector comes up with new innovations. But will admit that the government has solved a few techonological problems, ie the moonshot and the nuclear bomb. Drive, innovation, and growth in the freemarket will be rewarded by themselves, by promotions, and more money. But this one staement by you represents the biggerst philosophic difference. "...it should also make sure businesses live up to their responsibility to create American jobs, and look out for American workers..." Businessess responsibility is NOT to creat jobs. Businessess responsibility is NOT to look out for the American workers (from a fiscal standpoint, not safety). So what is business responsibility? Simply to MAKE MONEY. That is the basic difference between a free market and a government controlled business. Yes business should play by the rules, they should not be able to take advantage of anyone through either force or fraud. As far as Obamas statement, "It should ensure a shot at success not only for those with money and power and influence, but for every single American who's willing to work", it already does. With the free education (k-12), all kinds of college assistant programs, affirmative action, EEO, I say that if a person dosent get "a shot at success" it simply is their own fault. Unfortunately, the democratic definaition of "shot at sucess" usually ends up meaning equal outcome. In that you should read my meaning to be the liberal term "living wage".