Do You Like WWE Better or TNA?

I watch WWE more than TNA.WWE is more fun than TNA.I enjoy WWE more than TNA.

I definitely enjoy WWE better than TNA. TNA has alot of ex-WWE superstars like Sting, Kurt Angle, Kevin Nash, Bobby Lashley, Mick Foley, and Booker T. Oh yeah can't forget the Dudley Boyz aka Team 3D. I watch TNA sometimes.

I prefer WWE. Although, I do occasionally watch TNA. I like the women on TNA,they do more actual wrestling than the women on WWE. The WWE has the bigger stars, and the bigger production. TNA is okay as a secondary wrestling program.

I like wwe much better than tna wretling. As there is nothing else like wwe experience . All the fighters are involved so lively . Although tna must be having some great wrestlers but they all don't create much interest around there. And it doesn't have a big enough roster. Kurt angle was much liked by me when he was in wwe but after going to tna, he just changed his entire image and became more brutal.

I lile WWE better. I wont even watch TNA anymore. As for sting and Kurt Angle, I can take or leave sting but Kurt I have never liked him not even when he was with WWE.

WWE is 100x better than TNA!

My son in law watches every thing. But mostly WWE

I do not watch cable television and the only free wrestling shows that we have here around houston is on Friday nights when WWE comes on. I can see it for two hours. I really do enjoy wrestling, although lately there has been just too much talking and not enough wrestling going on. I never have had the opprtunity that i know of to watch TNA, so I am not in a position to compare TNA and WWE.

I hardly watch wrestling, but when we did, it was WWE. My father was a great wrestling fan, but that was years ago.

Um yes tna sucks and I dont even watch it. Especially after hearing how crappy it is from everyone. So I dont think I would even want to start watching it even though I saw a few episodes and it sucked so ill stick to wwe plus I dont think I can waste more money on pay per views a month.

i like the wwe better because i think that the superstars that use to be on wwe wind up going back anyway.

TNA used to be better when they had their weekly Pay Per Views and they first got onto FSN. I used to be a big backer of TNA but lately they have been going down hill and fast. At this point WWE is better. TNA needs better storylines and to start push their workers with real talent not just "the big names."

The main difference between TNA and WWE is money. Overall, to me, they are both pretty equal in my eyes. I know that if WWE RAW and TNA Impact ever ended up being on at the same time, I would watch TNA. I believe that they have more talented wrestlers, they just don't know what to do with them. TNA needs to put the focus back on the X division and secondly the Knockouts. These two groups provide the true talent of TNA. With WWE, they are basically doing the same thing over and over again. I don't think the new "pg era" is helping much either. WWE still considers the Divas to be jokes, regardless of the fact that some of them are actually VERY good wrestlers. Just like TNA, WWE puts all of their focus on about a handful of wreslters, while all the others are pretty much used as filler. The majority of the true talent lies with the "filler" but they are not given an opportunity to show what they got. Of all the promotions out there, if I could only pick one to watch the rest of my life, I would pick ROH (Ring of Honor). The wrestlers I watch TNA and WWE for used to wrestle with ROH. Plus one of my all-time favorite wrestlers works with ROH. The dvds are the same price as the TNA and WWE dvds, but unlike those, I can watch them over and over again and still be entertained.