Celebrity Endorsements

@worldwise1 (14885)
United States
April 29, 2009 9:58am CST
I have sounded off about this particular topic once before, but I thought it deserved another review. While watching TV this morning I once again was treated to Magic Johnson pitching an ad for a nationally-known furniture rental chain. Why, I asked myself? Isn't the purpose of using a celebrity to pitch their product to convince the public that this person uses and approves of said product? Now, I cannot - in my wildest imagination - picture Magic Johnson strolling into a Rent-A-Center store to rent furniture, appliances, or other merchandise. So, I have to ask myself why he(and many other celebrities), would consent to represent these places when it is so obvious that they are filthy rich and would have no need of such a product. Do you think the driving force is financial reward? I believe it has to be so. These ads only serve to diminish the celebrity, in my opinion. What about you?
4 people like this
9 responses
@winterose (39887)
• Canada
3 May 09
well what you say is right but how do you know that magic johnson would never use rental equipment if he goes on a vacation he may rent a cottage in spain and rent the furniture to go with it he may not want to buy it, in the usa, maybe he would do the same, but behind all the reasons you mention is the fact that celebrities will endorse stuff they think is good, and the people are supposed to think will this magic says it's good then it should be good. just like when oprah got sued because she said beef red meat wasn't healthy because she was oprah and people will do what she says.
2 people like this
@winterose (39887)
• Canada
8 May 09
I won't buy anything unless I really want it I don't care who is promoting it.
1 person likes this
@worldwise1 (14885)
• United States
6 May 09
I, for one, am so glad that I'm not one of those people who blindly accept anything on anyone's say so, winterose. Maybe I'm naive, but I just happen to believe that any celebrity of Magic Johnson's stature would not be bothered with furnishing a rental place if he was vacationing anywhere in the world. The place would most likely come completely ready to occupy. I just don't see someone with all of his $$$millions ever needing to rent anything!
2 people like this
@stephcjh (38473)
• United States
5 May 09
I have often weandered the very same thing. I think they think alot of people will use these products, just because a celebrity is the spokesperson for them.
2 people like this
@worldwise1 (14885)
• United States
6 May 09
That does just about sum it up, stephcjh. They think the public is so gullible that they will blindly follow wherever they are led.
1 person likes this
• India
30 Apr 09
Well money begets money and the rich become richer (at our expense) its as simple as that! Here in India every celebrity worth his/her salt endorses soft drinks (no not the diet versions)! Just imagine, loaded with fats and with no food values, that’s the last thing any sportsperson or actor would touch to their lips…yet they are there everywhere, all over the TV just for money, of course. Apart from that, there are spices and clothes (prêt) and mineral water and bikes and what not…its obvious that none of them use whatever they endorse so I never get influenced by them.
1 person likes this
@worldwise1 (14885)
• United States
6 May 09
Absolutely, sudiptacallingu! I just wish they would realize how stupid they are if they think the public actually believes they use these products!
@celticeagle (159227)
• Boise, Idaho
29 Apr 09
I think they use celebrities because they can get attention to their product. It helps for the celebrity to be able to varify that the product is a good one but that is not very often the case I am thinking. Yes, financial reward would be a big one. On both sides even. Diminish the celebrity? No, I think their 'people' wouldn't do it if they ever thought it would. I don't think it does the ones I have seen.
1 person likes this
@celticeagle (159227)
• Boise, Idaho
7 May 09
Oh, maybe you are right on this one.
@matersfish (6306)
• United States
30 Apr 09
Celebrity endorsements are a win-win situation. First of all, I don't believe it has anything to do with money in most cases. Famous people all have one thing in common: They want to be famous. For many, especially the Magic Johnson type, they want their face in the public's eye. They're thinking it will lead to more exposure for their own causes, which often include larger acting roles and business driven to their own ventures. For the places like Rent-A-Center, even if it doesn't tremendously help immediately, it won't hurt at all. Most people do not believe that the Magic one has a by-the-week rental plan for his washing machine, but with Magic in the commercial, more TV stations will run it. More people will pay attention to it. People will talk about it. And if one day you need to rent something, you'll think, "Hey, what was that place Magic was promoting? Let's check that out." Voila, the second win. The only true thing that diminishes a celebrity is a lack of air time. There truly is no such thing as bad press if you're a celebrity. Even Mel Gibson, though he's been torn apart in recent weeks, is still a winner in celebrity land because people are talking about him.
1 person likes this
@worldwise1 (14885)
• United States
6 May 09
I stand corrected, matersfish! Your explanation makes perfect sense to me, because there really is no such thing as bad publicity.
@jellymonty (2352)
29 Apr 09
Every time I see a celebrity endorse a product I immediately lose interest in that product. I don't believe they actually use these products so its just a PR thing really. But I find it very annoying really when companies use celebrities to endorse their products. I don't think it's logical. As for the status of the celebrity when endorsing the product, doesnt bother me as I think celebrities in general are a waste of time.. Being a celebrity is degrading enough in my eyes... so them doing endorsements doesnt really up or down their status to me...
1 person likes this
@worldwise1 (14885)
• United States
6 May 09
Gee, jellymonty, now tell us how you really feel!I must say, though, that I agree with you - celebrities are pretty low on the totem pole.
@freak369 (5113)
• United States
29 Apr 09
I am always amazed when people do endorsements for things like this. But what really gets me is the celebs that do pitches asking for donations; like the Feed A Child program. If they kicked in a couple million they could end that situation real quick. I wonder if they ask for a paycheck for being in those types of commercials. I guess you have to stop and ask, "When is enough enough?" At what point do you have enough money? Just look at Madonna and her power when it came to adopting a child. If she didn't have the fame and money, she would have never gotten the adoption to go through so quickly. I have no problem with celebs making money or doing endorsements but you hit the nail on the head with MJ. Can you see him walking in there every week to make his payment? This was a great post .. hope you get a lot of replies
1 person likes this
@worldwise1 (14885)
• United States
29 Apr 09
Absolutely, true, freak! They could at least try to keep it real! Nobody who knows anything at all about Magic Johnson would ever believe that he would need to shop at such a place when he has millions and can afford the very best.
@brandon22 (163)
• United States
29 Apr 09
I agree as well. It must be the money. I would imagine that 90% of celebrities don't use the products they endorse.
1 person likes this
@Elixiress (3878)
29 Apr 09
There are two types of celebrity endorsements, those of companies which pay a celebrity to say "oh this brand is so good" and then the one where the celebrity makes the brand, or at least has input into it. I hate the first type, where celebrities will say that anything is good just to make money, but then again if the celebrity actually uses the product and actually thinks it is good then that is fine eg Kate Moss and Rimmel, because she has been known to wear that particular brand, therefore she must actually like it. The second type is okay, as it makes sense for someone to promote their own range, celebrity or not. However it annoys me when a celebrity perfume is £10 more expensive than another perfume just because it has their name on it and not because it is £10 better smelling.
1 person likes this
@worldwise1 (14885)
• United States
6 May 09
It all comes back to the believability factor, Elixiress! I would never, in my wildest imagination, believe that he shops at this store.