Military Recuiting and Abortion

@ParaTed2k (22940)
Sheboygan, Wisconsin
June 2, 2009 12:42pm CST
Within the last few days an abortion doctor and a US soldier working at a Recruiting Center were killed by extremists for their cause. Both will be used as examples of extemism, and rightly so... the difference will be how their actions are used, and by whom. For some reason we lump whole groups by the actions of a few. Did the person who shot Tiller represent everyone who is against abortion? Did the person who killed William Long and wounded Quinton Ezeagwula (Can't seem to find their rank) represent everyone who has "religious and political" beefs against the US Military? Of course not, but that won't stop people from using these criminal acts to their benefit. Some "Pro Choice" people will try to make it seem that all "Pro Life" people identify with Tiller's killer... as if we're all just an excuse away from doing the same thing. It goes both ways though, there are people who will find ways to make political points out of the recruiting center shooting. Treating it as if anyone who speaks out against some military action wishes they were riding shotgun in Little Rock. They aren't alone. The anti gun crowd used the assassination attempt on Prs. Ronald Reagan to get all sorts of gun restrictions passed... none of which would have had any effect on the crime had they been in place at the time. So what is the lesson here? Some people will use any ammunition they can to make their point... even if it's a lie.
1 person likes this
6 responses
• United States
3 Jun 09
Well, let's not pretend the killing of abortion clinic workers, and the harassment of patients, are the works of isolated psychopaths. Of course, most Pro-Life people don't condone murder, and no one thinks they do. Polls show that time and again, and that's not really at issue. You're painting a Red Herring. What is at stake, though, is the fact that significant segments of the "Pro-Life" group operate in communities (churches, online groups, etc.) that ratchet up a rhetoric of vengeance, God's ire, countless "slayings of the innocent", etc. that many people can process responsibly, but that many other people cannot. Religion is the constant well at which these groups drink, and intoxicated with Terrible Vengeance of the Lord, they feel justified in demonizing abortion proponents not only as mass killers (sinners who are damning themselves), but as depraved monsters who will bring down all of the country and society under the fire of God's anger. None of this sort of rhetoric is the least bit relevant for the objective (and necessary) public debate over the medical technology, the role of family in decision making, the dignity of human life, and the social good. This killing was not isolated, and it was not (so far as I have heard, psychiatrically) the work of a sociopath. It is part of a well-documented pattern of violence, fueled by a mythological rhetoric and a deliberately intensified vehemence that takes special root in under-privileged sectors of society. Those who kill at abortion clinics are usually vulnerable in a number of ways: not well educated, steeped in church proselytizing, economically troubled, driven by an ideological "cause". These are not people who tore the wings off of flies or killed dogs as children--there was nothing inherent or inevitable about their violent outbursts. They were encouraged in this holy war against "baby killers" every step of the way by a community that has not yet learned to separate its own personal religion from the objective responsibilities of society.
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
3 Jun 09
Why do you twist my words to fit your agenda. They are the works of isolated psychopaths... Is the guy who shot the soldiers at the Military Recruiting Center in Little Rock indicative of everyone who has political beefs with the military? Don't hold others responsible for the actions of the few, unless you want to be lumped with every extremist wacko on your side of an issue.
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
3 Jun 09
I never said the word psychopath. Unless you are willing to be lumped together with wacko killers, not lump the rest of us with them, ok?
• United States
3 Jun 09
I am not trying to twist your words, but I am trying to situate this murder within its broader cultural and historical trajectory. Are you saying that there is no pattern to abortion clinic homicides? That they come from all religions, all economic strata, all demographics? That's what you would be implying, if you say it's just an aberrant mental pathology in human nature, and not a socially defined and encouraged process. What is your evidence that he is a psychopath? That is a psychiatric category, and unless you're a specialist, I don't think you're qualified to make the diagnosis. I actually have looked into the issue a little. People like the BTK killer are psychopaths, and there are well defined features that accompany it. This doesn't fit that profile at all, from anything I've seen. Not all killers are psychopaths. Most aren't, in fact. Inner-city gang killings usually aren't psychopathic, but they are targeted, within a socially-constructed set of values. That's what I'm saying this is. It was ideological murder, not sociopathic randomness. If it were truly psychopathic, rather than socially encouraged, then you would have an equal number of Pro-Choice extremists killing Anti-Abortion activists, periodically. It just doesn't happen that way. Nor did black people lynch whites once in a while, in the South. These are targeted hate crimes, supposedly justified by religious righteousness.
1 person likes this
@grammasnook (1871)
• United States
3 Jun 09
Lets not just leave it at some people Ted lets call it what it is, some government, some companies, some groups, some individuals, some religions, some races and I am sure the list can go on and on. Even if we have proof in black and white people will still tell you that it is a lie. Especially when it comes to the government. I do not have to prove anything because the people or the groups know the evil they spread when they spread it. All I have to say what goes around comes around so a lot of people better get ready!
1 person likes this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
6 Jun 09
You're so right, Ted, there will always be those who try to lump everyone who has the tiniest bit "in common" with an extremist into the same group as that extremist. The examples of this could probably go on into infinity. There are certainly those who call anyone who happens to be pro-choice "baby killers". Any woman who even remotely considers herself a "feminist" is a "man-hater". All of those who were against Prop 8 advocated the violence that occurred, including the beating of elderly women. As I said, the list can go on and on. Now I'm going to be VERY careful about how I say the rest of what I'd like to say on this subject because I know it will be very easy to word it wrong or for those who want to read the wrong thing into it to do so. First of all, I KNOW 99.999% of those who are against a woman's right to choose abortion in any or all cases are also against the kind of violence that took place last Sunday and the other times when abortion providers, clinics and those who worked at them have been shot, killed or bombed. HOWEVER...and this is where I'm taking a risk by saying it...there ARE some extremist activists who may not have ever actually taken part in an act of violence but I think they've contributed almost as much to the deaths and injuries as those who have pulled the trigger or set off the bomb. Randall Terry immediately comes to mind with his "He reaped what he sowed" remark after saying he disagreed with the murder. Unfortunately, it's people like him the public sees and remembers and I think that contributes to the stereotyping of anti-abortion activists. I really don't think it pertains to the average anti-choice person but more to those who are very active in the movement. Annie
• United States
6 Jun 09
Hi Annie, I think that was very well put. You have nuanced the situation very well.
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
3 Jun 09
"Some "Pro Choice" people will try to make it seem that all "Pro Life" people identify with Tiller's killer... as if we're all just an excuse away from doing the same thing." Well those morons just love to pretend every pro-life person is like that despite the fact that pretty much every major pro-life organization as well as Sarah Palin has condemned what happened to Tillman despite the fact that he was a despicable human being. One jerk on these very forums compared pro-life groups to al Quaeda. I don't know about you but I stopped waiting for prominent Muslim leaders and the Nation of Islam to condemn the 9-11 attacks a long time ago.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
3 Jun 09
yup, the bigotry knows no bounds.
@xfahctor (14118)
• Lancaster, New Hampshire
3 Jun 09
"Some "Pro Choice" people will try to make it seem that all "Pro Life" people identify with Tiller's killer... as if we're all just an excuse away from doing the same " You are indeed prophetic ted: http://www.mylot.com/w/discussions/2027569.aspx
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
3 Jun 09
I should have known that Masdebater would be so small minded.
@Adoniah (7513)
• United States
2 Jun 09
Th truth here is that there are fanatics in all walks of life. They make up a very small percentage of the population but a huge percentage of the headlines. Garbage is always newsworthy. Heroism is always backpage if at all. People want sensationalism. They want to be shocked and it gets harder and harder to shock people because there is so much garbabe in the news. A really good reporter would have put that on the back page. Don't feed the fanatics. They want their stories on the front page that is why they do what they do. Shalom~Adoniah
• United States
3 Jun 09
Really? A career Anti-Abortion activist, already caught once for having a pipe bomb in his car a decade ago, and spewing hate speech all over Anti-Abortion websites, kills one of three doctors in the country who performs a legal medical procedure that is at the heart of the "culture wars"--and you think "a really good reporter would have put that on the back page"? They used to hide the lynchings of blacks in the South as the work of a few isolated extremists, before it became more widely known that it was the product of a culture of hate that fueled such violence. I think that's the real story here--and it's not back page at all.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
3 Jun 09
seacaucus4 You forget that one of our President's mentors was once just an extremist with a pipe bomb in his car, spewing hate speech all over. He is now a respected professor who still spews hate speech... and advises the president.
• United States
5 Jun 09
Hi ParaTed-- I guess you mean Bill Ayers. Can I ask when he was ever Barack Obama's "mentor", or in what capacity he now "advises" the President? I think you are misinformed on this point, as were many right-wing bloggers during the campaign. Those mis-characterizations are not only deliberately over-stated, but I think more to the point, they do deliberate misservice to Obama's consistent philosophy of peace, reconciliation, and mutual understanding. Bill Ayers was an extremist lunatic--you and I are on the same page there. Can you cite one word of Obama's writings, or show one of his political actions or decisions, that in any way show any trace of radical violence? It's ludicrous, and the American people saw through those scare tactics. On the other hand, if you want me to start showing evidence of Extreme Right Wing acts of violence, that are actively fueled by conservative philosophies of militarism, I'd be pleased to oblige.
1 person likes this