What Constitution Was He A Professor Of?

He thinks the Constitution is flawed.... he doesn't realize that the flaw is within himself. Alito should have thrown a shoe at him.

I believe that his perception of that line is the freedom of speech as I see fit.

As I've said many times before, I believe he has thoroughly studied the constitution. He's studied it the same way a general studies the opposing army or a terrorist studies national security.

Obama reads the constitution for the same reason W.C. fields read the bible...looking for a loop-hole. I presume this has to do with the supreme court ruling recently. I am still sorting this out and haven't fully formed my opinion yet, whcih is why I have avoided commenting on it much as of yet. I will say this stems back to a ruling long ago in which the supreme court ruled that corperations were considered the sams as people in the eyes of the law and are afforded the same rights. Now, just because the supreme court ruled on something doesn't make it "constitutional". look at roe-v wade for example, the ruling itself was unconsitutional, but it stands as accepted law just the same. the problem began when we began relying on case law and precidence rather than constructionism and base constitutional interpretation.

Perhaps you should write and ask him. What I am opposed to is an "entity"...a corporation...a union...a special interest group...being afforded the same rights to freedom of speech that was bestowed upon the CITIZENS of this country.