Rick Perry and the "I don't listen to myself" movement

Tweet

Perry is emerging as a legitimate Republican candidate. Many of his ideas are gaining support but not all of them for the right reasons. We need look no farther than his own logic. Supposition number 1: the Federal government needs to return power to the states wherever possible. This commonly held concept, popular not only with the Republican Middle Right, Far Right and Tea Partiers is such a constant war cry that Everyday Americans ARE paying attention. But unlike Ron Paul, who embodies this concept, Rick Perry is far more selective. The biggest error in hypocrisy comes from his proposal for two new Constitutional Amendments: Define marriage as between a man and a woman and Make abortion illegal in all 50 states. Alot of people don't have a problem with either of these, but if Perry REALLY cared about the States' rights to govern he would not be trying to dictate these decisions to them. Like alot of politicians, I fear he is only for the States' rights when it is expedient for him. Supposition number 2: Perry believes a "wave of populism", to paraphrase, swept the country when the 16th and 17th Amendments were added. These amendments created the basis for the Federal Income Tax and the direct election of Senators by the public instead of State Representatives, respectively. He wants to see both overturned by new Amendments. I'm not going to argue he is wrong. I like the idea of having the Senators responsive to the States again as they were meant to be. I can even see the hatred of the Income Tax bringing about its demise despite my personal misgivings in that area. The problem is both would need to be caused by a popular, venomous and reactionary movement exactly like (despite moving in an opposite direction) the movement that brought the 2 amendments into being in the first place. It is nonsensical for Perry to attack the origin of these amendments if he hopes to use the same tactics to destroy them. His exact words were "The American people mistakenly empowered the federal government during a fit of populist rage". Of course, he doesn't seem to mind using the "fit of populist rage" that we have today to accomplish his own goals. He just wants to "mistakenly" disempower the federal government. (And if anybody has read me before at all, they'll probably not be surprised to read this prediction: It will be the last mistake we ever make to completely disempower the federal goverment!) His points are decent enough. He needs to just spell out his ACTUAL reasons and leave the sound bites out. If we're learning anything from the Tea Party movement, it's that the public is fed up with business as usual in politics. I'm afraid Perry is proving to be just that: more of the same politics, just more platable to the Right. Comments, dittoes and arguments welcome. Anybody else want to point out some hypocrisy from our favorite people: the politicians?