film series  |
|
Have you ever thought I wish they had stopped making sequels after the first film had been a hit. Just because the first one was good why make more? Take the Matrix, I feel the first is by far the best, and there is no point in making the second or third, and the original Matrix could stand on its own In the same way Rambo and Rocky, had good starts but the sequels add nothing What are your feelings?
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Phaedra_Scythe (1330) | 6 months ago | You know I read the first sentence of your discussion and was already thinking, "The Matrix". I enjoyed the first one rather a lot, but the second two were so boring I actually fell asleep in the cinema watching one of them. I can't even remember which one it was that I was dragged along to! The idea that there's another Rambo out is rather laughable. Stallone is a dreadful actor and could pull off the stoic action hero when he was younger, but he really does just look foolish now. Nonetheless, my partner is determined to go and see it for some reason!
| |
| |
|
|
mrtimharry (577) | 6 months ago | Think I'll watch Rambo just for the laughs, I guess Stallone will just kill as many people as he can to avoid any chance of acting
| |
|
|
|
Audi A5 Discussion Find Other A5 Owners Audi A5 Forums & Photos. www.InsideLine.com | add comment |
|
|
|
2. redrover (321) | 6 months ago | I disagree. I enjoyed Rambo 2 much better than one, the third O.K. There are many movies where the sequels are better then the first. Like Nightmare on Elm Street.
| |
| |
|
|
mrtimharry (577) | 6 months ago | With the Rambo series, I don't mind the second one, although I have to say the first one has more of a drama element to it.
| |
|
|
|
Map Control for ASP.NET Easy To Use SDK For Programmers. Download Your Risk-Free Evaluation. GIS.ThinkGeo.com | add comment |
|
|
|
|
mrtimharry (577) | 6 months ago | Have to say didn't even realise there was a sequel to Dirty Dancing - which is probably for the best
| |
|
|
brimia (5696) | 6 months ago | You're correct in that assumption:)
| |
|
|
brimia (5696) | 6 months ago | You're correct in that assumption:)
| |
|
|
|
Find It at Local Pages Looking for aspx web hosting? Search LocalPages.com. Localpages.com | add comment |
|
|
|
4. dangermouse (1993) | 5 months ago | I think that one follow up is fine it is when they do sequel after sequel then it gets really boring and as you say how often is the sequel any good?
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
5. deedee30 (217) | 5 months ago | The problem is that if you like a film then you will watch the sequel and maybe buy it so the producers get their money and then go on to do another and another, not always good ones but some are ok.
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
6. wolfie34 (10260) | 5 months ago | I am probably about the only one who didn't understand The Matrix and it bamboozled me, that after the first film I thought seeing another is not going to make any different in understanding the concept and what the film is really all about. I thought Pirates of The Caribbean went on for two long, I think they have got the shell of a story and it's so much easier to build upon it than start something from scratch, it's like cheaply cashing in on the original. Jaws was a shining example. One film about a killer shark is enough but to actually do 3 of them? Or was there 4? The second and third films were stupid and lost the interest because you knew damn well what was going to happen.
| |
| |
|
|
mrtimharry (577) | 5 months ago | Which Jaws had Michael Caine in it - seem to remember laughing at that one
| |
|
|
wolfie34 (10260) | 5 months ago | Jaws 4 The Revenge LOL! Michael Caine, blimey I think the shark would have committed suicide just to escape him not many people know that
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|