Nature Exposes Al Gore's Fraud...  

Only thing I don't like about the article they aren't addressing the melting ice caps issue. From the very limited knowledge I have on global warming (just from word of mouth) is that is causes extremes not necessarily only warmer temperatures but I do admit I know very little on the specifics of global warming.

I do think we need to tread a little nicer on our environment than we currently do but I do not like Al Gore at all. I saw something on tv about him making an unpatriotic statement (about America) in a foreign country after he won the Nobel but I haven't been able to locate the quote online.

yea i dont like all these algore fanboys..

but i have a feeling that global warming is true because scientists were discussing it before it became wrapped up in political bs...

and the sollutions that they have for saving the environment, whether or not global warming is true, is idiotic.. increasing state powers, stopping free market, etc etc.

The earth has been cooling since the 1998 el-nino ended.

As far as record highs, the revised NASA data put it in the 1930's somewhere, so the temperature hadn't really been going up at all.

In 2003 there was like a 3 degree drop in the temperature that year.

CO 2 has very little impact on the climate as the biggest factors are the sun and water vapor.

The man made global warming hoax is nothing more than an attempt by Al Gore to make a whole lot of money off of Carbon Credits, and the UN is hoping to become world dictator by passing all of those international environmental laws and then assessing fees and fines to participants and who they view as polluters.

Our government is hoping to raise a lot of taxes by passing their environmental and climate change prevention legislation, and the scientists are hoping for large grants to continue their "research" on this manufactured and non-existent problem.

From some of the articles I have seen in the last few months, the climate change we should be concerned about is a cooling driven by reduced sunspot activity.

Either way, a lot of people have bought into this hoax and have deluded themselves into thinking that man can control the weather.

We can't even forecast it, let alone even think to control it.

All you have to do is follow the money and you find both the cause and the culprits.

There have been several discussions on mylot pointing out Al Gore and company for whats really there. And even some responses/discussions point out errors in the findings and also important errors in the movies (even schoolchildren could pick up on at least a couple of the errors... well if not taught by stateside education systems -_-) Even if people still aren't convinced on the topic of warming (or lack of), there's still a more underhanded and sham-like debate going on.

If you aren't with Goreacle, you are [insert any sham you want here].
If you question Goreacle, [again insert any sham here].
If you bring up valid or reasonable facts that raise other questions, [insert yet another sham because the debate is "over" -_-]

B-b-b-b-but the poor polar bear! ;p

I thought that An Incovenient Truth was a very uh... interesting movie, yet it missed the point by trying too hard to scare people into action. I don't know, or claim to know, enough about climate change to make a definitive point one way or the other, but I can throw up a few thoughts.

Whether or not global warming exists should not be the only reason to seek cleaner and more efficient ways of manufacturing, energy production and other uses of the resources we have.

You have said it yourself: We aren't really able to forecast the weather; moreover, who is to say that one year can refute a theory? Come now...

We can wait and see, but in the meantime perhaps a little bit of responsibility won't hurt. Do we really have a need for negative reinforcement?

Well there is almost nobody who can predict future correctly expect the "God" himself. Prediction will always be there some may be right and some will always be wrong. Because human is not a God who makes future. If humans can predict future correctly then they will start calling themselves as God. So there has to be some distinction between God and Human.

Thanks for reading my response.

Goodbye

hmm i'd say al gore's graph was not 100% perfect so i think its up to each one of us to think for ourselves and make our own conclusions..

i'd like to see what he has to say about this year 2008 global cooling though...

If we were Muslim we probably would resort to stoning.( let him who is without sin throw the first stone!) I think Al was thinking more about his bottom line than about Mother Nature. Its sad that America is going to the Dogs. Never mind the bulls and bears! Aren't you glad Bush's Oil Money got Him elected? Imagine America after 8 years of Good Ole President Gore?

Are you really sure about you motive here? The world is really getting crazy and we have a lot of events going on on South America like huge waves and tremors. On Asia there are earthquakes and change of weather and it´s all because we, humankind, are detroying our own environment. It really doesn´t matter to me if was Al Gore or Michael Jackson that stood against it, but it´s already a good thing that we have people thiking about it, instead of being against like USA who stay againt projects like Kyoto. Do you really think it´s all going well with the world?

No matter what your opinion is about Al Gore, global warming is a fact. I think the debate is over. The world's scientists have to come to an overwhelming consensus that it's real. If people don't believe it, they will approach it the same way that the 9/11 conspiracy theorists do, they will continue to search for only the information that supports their theories.