Let's Discuss the Separation of Church and State
By anniepa
@anniepa (27955)
United States
July 9, 2008 4:33pm CST
...and hopefully, let's try to do it in a civil and mature manner. I realize there are some of us who consider this to be very important to our nation regardless of our own religious beliefs or lack thereof and there are others of us who will argue this separation doesn't even really exist so let's discuss it. I guess what I'm asking is for those of you who are opposed to the separation, how much influence do you think religion should have in our government and to those who are for it, how far do YOU think it should go? For myself I think Mike Huckabee's remarks about it being easier to rework the Constitution to fit the bible than the other way around were rather frightening simply because we don't all interpret the bible the same way even among those of us who are devout Christians or believers in another faith. I think every church or denomination has every right to make their own rules but, for example, because the Catholic Church doesn't believe in divorce shouldn't mean divorce should be ILLEGAL in the U.S. Any church who is opposed to gay marriage shouldn't be forced to recognize or perform gay marriage ceremonies but our laws shouldn't be based solely on religious beliefs of any faith. I think it's ridiculous that anyone should be hesitant to say "Merry Christmas" for fear of offending someone but at the same time if they choose to say "Happy Holidays" that's fine too!
What do you think? I'd like to hear from people of different faiths or no faith but let's keep it friendly.
Annie
6 people like this
10 responses
@lvaldean (1612)
• United States
10 Jul 08
It is simple - I believe in two things.
The Constitution of the United States of America as it was written and intended to be used as the framework for a nation.
The Bill of Rights as they were written and intended to be the framwork for a nation.
Neither of these were ever intended to be the full and complete "forever" laws but they were intended to define the full and complete framework for a new nation.
A nation founded based on the notion of secular laws.
A nation founded on the rights of the individual to pursue happiness.
A nation founded on the idea of freedom of and from religion.
A nation founded on individual rights over government rights.
A nation that nowhere in either the Constitution or the Bill of Rights is God in any form or fashion ever mentioned.
A nation that produced money where God was never mentioned until the last century.
A nation where God was never mentioned in the Pledge until the middle of the last century.
That is what I believe. In a secular nation where all men and women are free to worship any any way they choose but are not free to impose their beliefs on others through legal sanctions or Government adopted religion.
Merry Met!
2 people like this
@lvaldean (1612)
• United States
10 Jul 08
I was told recently that I am mean and cold. I was also told that I am at times emotionaless. I don't think either are true. I think I am pragmatic.
So to answer your question I think it is a lifetime of consideration of some of these issues that causes me to be clear on what I think.
1 person likes this

@Pose123 (21635)
• Canada
10 Jul 08
Hi annie, I thought that America was founded on the idea of the separation of church and state. Wasn't that why the first settlers left England, so they could worship as they wanted. I would keep church and state as far apart as possible. When religion and politics get together, there is always trouble. Blessings.
2 people like this
@Smith2028 (797)
• United States
12 Jul 08
This is a really tricky subject, as I have had to go back and re-formulate my thoughts as I typed. WHile my main stance never changed, I needed to tweak the concept a bit. Good subject.
Now:
I do not believe in the separation of church and state, as it has no basis in our constitution or in law. The constitution simply protects us from the government imposing a national religion that we all must practice. However, I do believe this is not a mandate for the government to mingle into church affairs.
I believe there should be a time in schools for morning prayer. That the words "In God We Trust" should stay on our currency and "One Nation, Under God" should remain in the pledge as these are basic pillars of why our country was formed. The brave men and women who came over here truly were Under God and trusting in him to push them through the bad times and develop a truly great nation.
I believe that in order to have a shining city on a hill, and preserve the American Dream, we must believe in basic family values and believe in basic religious values (sinning and the difference between right and wrong). I believe funding religious organizations to tackle basic social issues and problems should not only be allowed, but should be encouraged. These groups believe deeply in what they do and will take what they are given and return it to society tenfold.
However, I do believe that the government should stay out of religious issues. Marriage (both homosexual and heterosexual) and divorce are two areas the government has absolutely no rights to govern.
1 person likes this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
13 Jul 08
Thank you for an obviously well-thought-out response. It's difficult to disagree with much of what you wrote here but I'll sum it up by saying it's hard to achieve what you wrote in your last two sentences without a total separation because there are always some who think the government indeed does have rights to govern when it comes to these personal issues. I also understand what you mean about the religious organizations giving back, however with Bush's "Faith Based Initiatives" it turned into something I don't think was intended with people being turned down for jobs if they weren't of a certain faith. I don't think if an organization is receiving tax dollars that any kind of discrimination should be allowed not to mention the fact that if a religious organization is give government funds who's going to be sure they don't discriminate when they're handing out the services to those in need? As for prayer in schools I think anyone should be allowed to pray whenever they want to but I don't think there should be a prayer led in the classroom by a teacher or other school official. "Under God" wasn't included in the Pledge of Allegiance until 1954 so I don't think that should be that huge of an issue. In my opinion, if someone wants to say those two words, that's fine, if they choose not too, that's fine as well.
Sadly, this whole question shouldn't be the big issue it is to some! Like with so many issues there are extremists on both sides that cause all of the problems that exist with it. People speak out about "taking God out of our schools" and I'll agree some of the things that have been made into major issues are ridiculous such as saying "Merry Christmas" or even actually acknowledging the existence of religious holidays in public schools although we know the vast majority of the students (in most schools) celebrate these holidays. However, with no limits you'll have a teacher like the one I'd mentioned in another post who told a class of small children that if their parents used birth control it was the same as murdering babies and that the parents would go to hell! There's always that proverbial "slippery slope" that someone will be waiting to push us down, isn't there?
Annie
@sarahruthbeth22 (43143)
• United States
13 Jul 08
I would willing die to keep the separation of church and state. I am not Christian and I would rather be killed than be one. So under a Christian Only United States, I would either be sent to a camp or be killed , right? I like that the separation protects the church more than the state. If there were an official religion, they would be forced to accept gays into their church or they would be sued because it is a tax fueled arm of government. Or to keep them out, they would have to make it so gay people Don't have to pay taxes. That would work.If it were a conservative religious group takes over, Sundays could be deemed the holiest day of the week. You know what that means? No Sunday Football.And if there was a official religion,what happens to people like me? Are we jailed, deported, or are we to be killed. And if wee were to be killed, how?
1 person likes this

@sarahruthbeth22 (43143)
• United States
15 Jul 08
The only true statement that starts all Christians ends with are Christians. There are so many that you can't assume they are all the same.
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
14 Jul 08
You paint a very scary picture there but probably more realistic than many would choose to believe. The fact is, it is the very conservative religious groups who aren't accepting of the whole premise of the separation of church and state and if they had their way, God only knows what they'd try to do. Before anyone gets offended, I'm not saying all Christians, all religious people or all conservatives are like this but there certainly are some who are and I think we all know it.
Annie
1 person likes this

@Rozie37 (15499)
• Turkmenistan
10 Jul 08
First I need to say that I do not follow politics the way most people do. So I do not want to be referred to as a leftest, extremist, or any of those other titles. I am simply a child of God.
In my personal opinion, there would be no need for seperation of church and state if people were not trying to legally live in sin. People already know the difference between right and wrong. Maybe they believe that somehow they will be able to blame the government for living in sin. NOT, every human being will have to take responsibility for the choices they made here on earth.
1 person likes this
@Rozie37 (15499)
• Turkmenistan
11 Jul 08
A lot of the things that you mentioned are not considered sins in my religion. People do not realize that things changed in the New Testament, as we are no longer under the law, but under grace. For instance, the New Testament states that all meats are good, as long as you give thanks.
1 person likes this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
11 Jul 08
"A lot of the things that you mentioned are not considered sins in my religion."
I realize that but my point is that they are according to some religions which is a good reason not to base our laws on any religion. There are some things that various people may consider to be sinful that aren't actually illegal because everyone doesn't feel the same way about them. I don't think anything good has even come from a nation being governed according to one particular religious belief.
Annie
@CherylsPearls (1269)
• United States
9 Jul 08
I believe in total separation of Church and State. Anyone who knows the history of our country should know why. I have been appalled at the Republican party for years; some of them would like nothing better than to have a religious government. I wonder which model they would like to follow? If you look at the Middle East, you will find how having a religious government has worked for them (and those of us who are their "enemies.")
Bush's efforts to pass tax revenues onto religious organizations has been really frightening. I hate than now, I have to wonder what Obama is thinking when he says he may carry out some of Bush's ideas about funding religious-based charities. He aims to separate the money, he says, but that won't work. Either our revenues go to private, religious organizations, or they don't. There is no middle ground. I am totally against this idea of funding "helping" organizations. What do you think of Obama's ideas about it? Just curious.
Below are some quotes for you. Like I stated, I don't want any involvement between my government and any religion. None at all.
"Let us labor for the security of free thought, free speech, pure morals, unfettered religious sentiments, and equal rights and privileges for all men, irrespective of nationality, color, or religion;.... leave the matter of religious teaching to the family altar, the church, and the private school, supported entirely by private contribution. Keep church and state forever separate." Ulysses S. Grant's Speech to G. A. R. Veterans, at Des Moines, IA 1875.
"I hold that in this country there must be complete severance of Church and State; that public moneys shall not be used for the purpose of advancing any particular creed; and therefore that the public schools shall be non-sectarian and no public moneys appropriated for sectarian schools." Theodore Roosevelt, Address, New York, October 12, 1915
2 people like this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
9 Jul 08
I agree 100% with both of those quotes. thanks so much for posting them.
I'm also uncomfortable with Obama's ideas about "faith based" organizations and I also wonder what he's thinking. It's that famous, or infamous, slippery slope in my opinion. You're right, there is no middle ground when it comes to these things.
Annie
1 person likes this
@irisheyes (4370)
• United States
11 Jul 08
Of the thirteen original colonies, twelve had official or unoffficial state religions (The Calvinism of New York, the Puritans in new England, the Catholics in Maryland etc.) There was one notable exception. Pennsylvania was under William Penn's "Holy Experiment" that guaranteed religious freedom to all and THAT was the ideal used by the founding fathers when framing the consititution. Of course Mike Huckabee and the rest were not around back then but even if they had been, I'm certain the framers in their 18th century humanistic wisdom would still have chosen William Penn's experiment. It was a brilliant choice at the heart of this nation's freedoms and should never be changed
1 person likes this
@Samanthavv (1380)
• United States
10 Jul 08
I'm not religious at all, but you know, it dosen't bother me if other people are. Our entire country was founded on principles from the bible whether people like it or not. Don't steal. Don't kill. Don't lie. Don't cheat.
1 person likes this
@newtondak (3946)
• United States
11 Jul 08
For those who are not familiar with the Separation of Church and State, here is a link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Separation_of_church_and_state_in_the_United_States
1 person likes this
@LovesTravel (303)
• United States
11 Jul 08
I think that the Founders showed great wisdom in their efforts to separate "church and state." Much has been written by religious fundamentalists about how the Founders incorporated christian principles into our Charters of Freedom. In fact, what they attempted to do was to incorporate Enlightenment principles--secular values derived from the best philosophical ideas of the time. While these principles acknowledged a Higher Power (many of the Founders, including Jefferson, were deists), they honored different traditions and held different opinions about the rationale for formal religious practice. Jefferson even tried to rewrite the Christian Bible (or New Testament) in a "rational" way.
I think that most of the Founders would be horrified by recent trends to formalize narrowly constructed religious practice into our federal system--and rightly so. In my opinion, such efforts, such as those advocated by Huckabee, are contrary to the Constitution. Moreover, I believe they constitute a significant threat to religious freedom in the United States.
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
13 Jul 08
Welcome to myLot and thanks so much for a super response! I couldn't agree more with everything you wrote, especially your comments about Huckabee. That really scared me when he said that about reworking the Constitution to fit the Bible and the thought that some people agreed with that scared me even more.
Annie











