eating kangaroos will help climate change
By vegegirl
@vegegirl (828)
Australia
August 18, 2008 7:10pm CST
Because of climate change and the realisation that the community is suddenly getting that beef farming is bad for the environment, in Australia some people are starting to call for more kangaroo farming for food.
This is far more beneficial for the environment than beef farming, but could you eat Skippy? - Kangaroos already live here naturally, eat local food etc.
I couldn't, but I don't even eat cows - I think this is just another easy way out for all those who just can't give up eating meat.
What do you think.
1 person likes this
12 responses
@speakeasy (4171)
• United States
19 Aug 08
The basis behind this it the simple fact that cows, pigs, and goats all produce huge amounts of methane gas which is bad for the environment; but, kangaroos don't produce methane gas. (Personally, I would not want to be the scientist who checked each of these species to see what they "produced".)
I think that this could be an alternate food source for places where they can be raised; but, I do not know if they could be raised in large enough numbers on continents other than Australia. I am not exactly sure what they require and they coould probably jump most fences. I also don't think they can be "milked" like cows and goats; so we would still need herds of cows and goats for milk, cheese, and ice cream!
Kangaroos may look "cute and cuddly"; but, they can actually be rather dangerous and one attacked an elderly woman who was near her home on a ranch in Australia just a few weeks ago. She was saved by her dog that drove the kangaroo off; but, she still had to go to the hospital.
1 person likes this
@vegegirl (828)
• Australia
19 Aug 08
thanks speakeasy
Yes rudimentary animals (ones that chew their cud)produce more methane gas, not just from their behind!
We can just have nut or soy milk and their won't be a dairy problem.
I hadn't heard that story. We have many types of kangaroos, I would guess that might have been a boxing kangaroo - I think they are largest. It is highly unusual for them to do something like this, but they do box each other - generally I thought it was a male thing for territory - so possibly it was that sort of thing or a mother protecting her young? It must have been scary for the elderly lady, but this isn't really the normal thing that kangaroos do and their are a lot of them so we would hear these stories all the time if they were really dangerous. I certainly don't think I would be approaching a boxing kangaroo in the wild though - but would you approach a panda?
We also have lots of smaller kangaroos and wallabies and pademelons - very cute.
@SummerChick (513)
• Philippines
19 Aug 08
This news about eating Skippy was sensationalized when apparently this doctor from Greenpeace was advocating eating kangaroos instead of the other meats. Greenpeace denies this report.
http://www.greenpeace.org/australia/resources/faq/climate-change#general_7
Kangaroos is not really methane-free. They released at least 1/3 as much as that of the cows, sheeps and goats. Methane was released from the digestive tracks of these animals and also the nitrous oxide from animal cesspools.
On global warming, if you really wanna contribute to stop this global problem, start by eliminating or reducing the meat in your meals.
So stop killing Skippy, you wont solve the problem of global warming eating the poor animal.
1 person likes this
@vegegirl (828)
• Australia
19 Aug 08
Thanks summerchick.
I think that information (or the bit about cows and methane) has come from many sources. Vegetarian literature has had this sort of information for a long time.
But the latest Skippy story was on ABC radio national on the "science show" a couple of weeks ago - 9th August (saturday). If you go to their website There are 2 transcripts from this show - 1. Animal farming and greenhouse gas emissions and 2. Kangaroos greenhouse gas emission better than cattle.
You can also listen to a podcast of the show.
I was happy that mainstream radio is at least recognising that animal farming is bad for the environment, maybe that will get a few more people to go vegetarian?

@singout (1008)
• United States
19 Aug 08
I couldn't do it. Besides being cute and unusual, I'd be afraid of developing an uncontrollable urge to hop everywhere I go. Seriously though, I suppose it would depend on how plentiful they are. In the states, hunting the deer has only resulted in overpopulation in some areas. I know that sounds unusual, but nowadays the hunters have been unable to keep up with the quota set forth by the game authorities. I believe I read somewhere that there are more deer killed by drivers than by hunters. The more there is for the deer to eat the easier it is for them to propogate which also makes for a healthier species.
@vegegirl (828)
• Australia
19 Aug 08
Thanks singout, don't worry most people I know eat meat too. A lot of them now don't mind eating a vegetarian meal occasionally though. In face often if a cafe has a vegetarian dish and a meat dish, the vegetarian dish runs out first (because the meat eaters eat it) and sometimes there is nothing left for the vegetarians to eat!
@peavey (16936)
• United States
23 Aug 08
So they'd start raising kangaroos instead of cattle? I'm sure there are other problems with that, probably not found out until many of the cattle operations have been dismantled.
Then, too, you'd have to create a market for kangaroo meat. There might already be one in Australia, but apparently not a very big one.
I eat meat and I would eat kangaroo, but eating it probably wouldn't make much difference in climate change! It might help a little if the whole world swore off beef and destroyed all the beef cattle out there, and that won't happen.
1 person likes this

@vegegirl (828)
• Australia
24 Aug 08
Hi Peavey
thanks, you have bought up some important points. Yes - I think hey will start farming them (if this went ahead) but you are right saying they'll probably get new problems they haven't found out about yet. We have already had these types of problems in Australia - for example they introduced prickly pear here in the early 1800's - it became a pest that even forced people off their land!
Why do human's not learnfrom past mistakes?

@Raja_Franklin (683)
• India
19 Aug 08
Eating kangaroos? I don't think that eating animals like kangaroos will help climate change.
@sanjana_aslam (4187)
• Malaysia
19 Aug 08
sorry this is not intended to hurt anyone ... i have heard than some countries (not naming) actually include the kangaroo meat with their beef exports .. I am not sure how far it is true ... will the beef eaters actually taste the difference between the two ...
But in a very neutral note : when people eat chicken,cow, fish another living being it does not make different if they eat kangaroo, rabbit or human right ? why suddenly should they feel when it is kangaroo
By the way ... i eat chicken and seafood .. yummy ... yummy
1 person likes this
@sanjana_aslam (4187)
• Malaysia
19 Aug 08
... the human law says .. they will hang a person if he committed murder once... what if he murdered 2 person or more , are they going to hang him twice or more times ... only once right ... so eat all the animal you want ... (not you vege girl ...)
1 person likes this
@TheNeverMan (44)
•
19 Aug 08
I would eat probably anything once (more if it was nice lol) but i heard they are looking to control the cows dna to stop it producing so much methane. Thats why they are looking at kangaroos they don't fart (or not as but i can't remember).
1 person likes this
@vegegirl (828)
• Australia
20 Aug 08
I think cows as ruminants also produce more methane from their "top" end, as they "chew their cud", they regurgitate their food to chew it a second time so they can digest it. This causes them to produce methane from their mouth as well.
I think kangaroos still "break wind" but they don't chew their cud so they wouldn't produce as much methane. The other logic behind this is that the kangaroos are already there and eat food that is natural to Australia, so they may as well be used for something beneficial for humans, and we won't need to farm as many cows which aren't natural to our country and environment.
I'm not saying I agree with killing kangaroos, I am just explaining some people's logic to this reasoning.
@ronaldinu (12422)
• Malta
9 Nov 08
I don't think that eating kangaroos will help climate change. The two subjects are not related. Climate change is effected by other sources such as gas emissions not by animals. © ronaldinu 2008
@oscarbartoni (2581)
• United States
19 Aug 08
Deer populations have risen in the United States of America because the predators have been almost entirely eliminated. And then there is the question of hunting only the males of the species which leaves us with more females to reproduce. It is not a thing that calls for much brain power to see.And in may place they are eating moat of the vegetation and causing great damage to their environment. Around the man made lakes they are eating the foliage of of the evergreens that help to keep soil from washing away when it rains. I think that kangaroos could be ranched and harvested in a way as to keep the population under control. I think that as long as a population is healthy then there should be no reason that some of the animals can be harvested. This would take some of the pressure off of less populated animals.
1 person likes this
@vegegirl (828)
• Australia
19 Aug 08
Thanks oscarbartoni
Good points.
I think it is a shame though that man caused most of these problems by farming the wild land in the first place, killing predators and destroying the natural balance of the land.
Then after we have done things that ruin this balance we say "wow, there is hardly any good land left and the animals are destroying it lets do something about it. Maybe we could now eat the kangaroos and deers, that would fix it!"
yet we are still building, polluting, mining and driving! Will we never learn.
@vegegirl (828)
• Australia
19 Aug 08
Thanks Ashar
I haven't eaten kangaroo either. At the moment it isn't widely eaten her but it is available, I think more of a delicacy here(because I don't eat meat I don't know too much about it) and I think it is available for pet food. The way the talk is at the moment kangaroo meat may become more available for people that do eat meat.
I think Australians eat most of the same meat you eat as well. We probably don't see goat or buffalo meat that much here. We do have goats cheese here though.
@hiddenwing (3719)
• China
19 Aug 08
People eat kangaroos?
This is unbelievable!
I guess kangaroos are of important social status such as pandas in China.
@vegegirl (828)
• Australia
20 Aug 08
I agree hiddenwing, it is terrible that people eat kangaroos - I guess if they'll eat one poor animal, they'll eat most others (for some reason a lot of Australians seem to thing that eating dog or rat is bad though).
Kangaroos aren't protected enough, some species maybe, I think tree kangaroos could be (but I would have to check in to that to be certain). People tend to think of kangaroos in the wild as a pest as they come into their farms.
Of course kangaroos were there before farmers and they probably think humans are a pest!
@lixiaos77 (1030)
• Shijiazhuang, China
19 Aug 08
I don't think take wild animals as food is a good idea. I often worry about if they are still live on the earth 20 year later. But some experts say that if you take them as food, more people will feed them as commodity and they population will be enlarged. Maybe it is not bad to take kangaroos as foods.
1 person likes this
@veganbliss (3895)
• Adelaide, Australia
3 Aug 11
Yes, this has been a fairly controversial subject Down Under, probably for quite some time. I didn't see it on the telly, but I don't watch it much at all these days. I tend to agree with you that meat eaters may see this as an easy way out - but really it is not! The reason for this lies mainly in the amount of meat available on each kangaroo that is fit for human consumption - sorry, that experts claim is fit for human consumption! I sighted one report that claimed this figure to be roughly 15% of the roo, whereas a larger percentage of cows are used.
If people still wanted their meat so badly, they could grow it in a laboratory like the solution, or rather the million dollar competition, that was run by PETA some time ago.











