Can "Dewey Defeats Truman" happen in this election?  |
| |
| Weeks prior to the 1948 election, many leading editorial writers and political columnists relied on early Gallup Polls, which predicted Thomas E. Dewey's win over incumbent Harry S. Truman. In spite of all the media predictions to the contrary, even based on Gallup Polls a few weeks before the election, Truman still defeated Dewey in the presidential election. Do you think this could happen today, even with the more sophisticated forms of media and polling methods? | | | | | |
| |
| | Politics: Warren's site Official Website of the Elizabeth Warren for MA Senate Campaign. ElizabethWarren.com/
| Political Forum #GOP #Obama #Immigration #2012 Share Your Opinion with Others. www.livecitizen.com
| Local Coupons 1 ridiculously huge coupon a day. Save 50-90% on your city's best! www.Groupon.com
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| |
clrumfelt (1907)
|
4 years ago
| | Sorry, sirnose, my tv antenna doesn't pick up very well through these stone walls. I agree the polls are basically meaningless and the media mostly tells us what they want us to hear. Thanks for your response. | | | |
| |
| Politics: Warren's site Official Website of the Elizabeth Warren for MA Senate Campaign. ElizabethWarren.com/ | add comment | | |
|
|
2. redyellowblackdog (4040)
|
4 years ago
| | It is true polling is more sophisticated and potentially more accurate than in 1948. Unfortunately, pollsters do not seem as honest. I suspect what has been gained in polling technology has been lost to pollster's dishonesty. Vote McCain - Palin! | | | | | | |
clrumfelt (1907)
|
4 years ago
| | I think the MSM still try their best to make everyone believe the election is a done deal long before election day, just as they did in 1948. | | | |
| |
| Political Forum #GOP #Obama #Immigration #2012 Share Your Opinion with Others. www.livecitizen.com | add comment | | |
|
|
3. MSV1313 (2239)
|
4 years ago
| | I'm hoping that it does! I remember in 2004 the media was all about Kerry's lead in the polls... | | | | | | |
clrumfelt (1907)
|
4 years ago
| | I'm hoping, too. I'm beginning to think if we take the opposite of what the MSM are preaching during presidential elections, we will have the truth. What they do in trying to manipulate the thinking of the American people could be called mere wishful thinking. People should give more credence to their gut instincts than to the MSM and their polls. | | | |
MSV1313 (2239)
|
4 years ago
| | I posted this in another discussion, but I feel the need to share it here as an example of why you can't always trust what the polls say: Polls are more subject to bias than most people are aware. I worked for a market research company and used to call people to take surveys. My company would often do political surveys and here's is an example of how it works: Question asked to voter: Would you vote for candidate Mixlplic if you knew he donated every paycheck he ever made to feed and house homeless people, orphans and kittens? Most people say yes, even though Mixlplic never did such a thing, but it is not a lie because it is a "hypothetical" question. Question asked to voter: Would you vote for candidate Zippyflip if you knew that he routinely killed and ate kittens and wants to raise taxes to pay for contributions to groups that feed homeless people and orphans to alligators? Most people say no, even though Zipplyflip never did such things, but it is not a lie because it is a "hypothetical" question. Then the survey results come out and say that the majority of voters say that hey will vote for Mixlplic. The thing about statistics is that they can be manipulated to say whatever it is that you want them to say. And surveys such as the one I used for an example, not only give misleading results, but the hypothetical lies used to get the kind of answers desired also plants a seed in the mind of voters, who may actually now beleive that one candidate kills kittens and the other rescues them. Mark Twain said it best: "There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics." | | | |
| |
| Local Coupons 1 ridiculously huge coupon a day. Save 50-90% on your city's best! www.Groupon.com | add comment | | |
|
|
| |
clrumfelt (1907)
|
4 years ago
| | Thanks for responding, kenzie. This information is very encouraging. Routers is a well known news agency and I'm glad they are being thorough to try and get a lot of demographic information when they do their polls. In my opinion it gives a much more accurate view of how the American people are thinking. | | | |
| |
| Free Media Player Get MPlayer Media Player Free. Watch Movies, Videos, Clips & More www.PopularDownloads.com | add comment | | |
|
|
5. suspenseful (19611)
|
4 years ago
| | I have no idea who will win. I do hope that McCain wins, but it seems that the media prefers Obama. I also know that some are resorting to dirty tricks to help Obama by bringing up McCain's past or past associates and some of these people are here on myLot. So it could happen that the one you were expected to win might not. And the one expected to lose might win. That is why this is a scary election. If the one with the most charm wins, we will be in trouble. | | | | | | |
clrumfelt (1907)
|
4 years ago
| | I am believing McCain will win, just because I think that most Americans aren't that gullible, to choose charm over dedication when choosing a president. I think polls are highly changable and that they are manipulated in a variety of ways in their presentations according the the whims of the MSM. Obama's resume looks lame alongside John McCain's, so I think most people will realize he is the better candidate to choose. | | | |
| BKP100 (1)
|
4 years ago
| | I'm a McCain supporter, however (and unfortunately) I've come to believe Americans *are* that gullible. They respond to talking points parroted by partisan automatons, as opposed to doing the research for themselves. They listen to campaign mantras that have absolutely no substance or meaning. They believe what they hear, if they hear it enough times. They vote a party without even understanding what that party's platform *really* stands for today. They buy what an incredibly tainted mainstream media feeds them. They believe the indignation and outrage of fools like Barney Frank and Chris Dodd, in reference to the credit meltdown, when those two were probably more responsible than any other elected official. They believe the perpetually "edited" platforms of Barack Obama, whom's entire career has been all about his own advancement (he's never written biographies, or novels, or texts -- only *autobiographies* -- it's always about Obama). They would rather respond to elegant two-faced smiles, and empty polished promises, than disheveled substance, and awkward honesty. I've given up. They'll get what they deserve... | | | |
| |
| Media & Entertainment Find Media and Entertainment. Your Business Solution Business.com www.business.com | add comment | | |
|
|
6. evanslf (406)
|
4 years ago
| | Yes it is possible that we could have another Dewey defeats Truman, but I think it unlikely. Firstly, because polling is far more accurate than it used to be. In 2000 for instance, the polls showed Bush with a slight lead for most of the campaign but also showed Gore pulling closer come election day. There tends to be a last minute swing to the incumbent (VP in this case) so the election result was very close, as most of the polls had pointed out. Simiarly, in 2004, I believe that the polls got it dead right. Again it was close and again some polls predicted a Kerry victory whilst most others a Bush victory. Looking at pollingreport.com in the week before the election though showed that Bush had an average lead of 2 - 3% in the polls, and the election end up exactly that, a 2-3% national lead for George Bush. Again the polls correctly predicted Clinton's wins in 1992 and 1996 (ie I remember in 1992 they averaged at Clinton leading Bush senior by 5 points, and that is what happened - 43 to 38%) Of course if the race is very tight, then any individual poll will say McCain leads, or Obama leads as all are subject to a margin of error. The key thing here is to look at the average of all the polls to get a clearer picture. Here the average shows that Obama leads by 6 points, but there are always outlier polls (1 in 20) that will fall outside the margin of error, hence some polls will show Obama with a double digit lead wilst others may show McCain virtually neck and neck. The key thing though is to bear the average of polls in mind, and that average should be non-partisan polls as one cannot trust partisan polls to poll properly. Www.pollingreport.com and www.electoral-vote.com are useful websites for this. Of course polls are snapshots that reflect the way a campaign is going at this particular moment in time. There could be an October surprise that suddenly changes things. But if the average of the polls shows Obama with a 6% lead or so in the polls in the last week of the campaign, then he is very likely to win. If however this average shows McCain closing on him and Obama's lead is 2% or less (or even dead heat), then the election could go either way. | | | | | | |
| |
| advance blasting we do mobile soda blasting advanceblasting.com | add comment | | |
|
|
| | Free Media Player Get MPlayer Media Player Free. Watch Movies, Videos, Clips& More www.PopularDownloads.com
| Media& Entertainment Find Media and Entertainment. Your Business Solution Business.com www.business.com
| advance blasting we do mobile soda blasting advanceblasting.com
|
|
| |
| |
| |