Banks are starting to charge us to bail them out!

@coffeebreak (17797)
United States
November 15, 2008 8:50am CST
And while the government bails out the banks that made such greedy and bad choices that caused the current recession.... now the banks are putting it back on the people... http://finance.yahoo.com/banking-budgeting/article/106142/Banks-Boost-Customer-Fees-to-Record-Highs Keep an eye on your bank as to what they are charging. They won't come out and tell you face to face, they will just send a little small type 'brochure" to you in the mail mentioning the new charges in near-complicated legal mumbo-jumbo. ANd if you don't read it, you will be "surprised" when the higher fees hit you. Funny, ever wonder why when you go into a bank they have the huge posters telling of all their great offers to you and how they can help you - - yet you never see a poster saying "and here is what we will be charging you for our checking services"?
1 person likes this
4 responses
@drannhh (15219)
• United States
16 Nov 08
Thanks for the heads up. I guess if they start charging me for any checking services they can find themselve a new customer, as I will certainly find a new bank!
1 person likes this
@coffeebreak (17797)
• United States
16 Nov 08
I think they all have charged for over drafts and bounced checks although they are raising the fees for both - my bank give me 2 "free" bounced check fees per year. But I bet the day of the free checking account is coming to a close - $12 a month for hundreds and hundreds? Lot of money to be had there! And since we all need banks, they are not going to be at all concerned about loosing customers!
1 person likes this
@drannhh (15219)
• United States
16 Nov 08
Maybe we need to rethink the idea that we all need banks? It is like back in the 70's when the price of coffee shot up and hubby stopped drinking the stuff and still doesn't. You, I think do not have that dependency nor do I, but many people do. If we should ever have to end up paying a monthly fee for a checking account, which I doubt, I'd rather pay a credit union than a bank.
1 person likes this
@coffeebreak (17797)
• United States
16 Nov 08
I think they'll have them free as long asyou keep $1,000 or more balance, If less, you get charged. And since there is online bill pay, why not just open a savings account and pay from there? And tie your debit card to the savings account - it all works that same way a checking account does, and since so many places don't take personal checks anymore....maybe the savings account is the safe harbor of a resolution!
• United States
17 Nov 08
Our bank now charges $37 for a bounced check - up to three times for the same check. It's $37 when the check is first presented. If you haven't brought the account current within 3 days, it's another $37 and the check is returned. If the check is presented again, it's ANOTHER $37. Last year, my roommate suffered a stroke and one of the effects of the stroke was a lowering of inhibition about money affairs. Before I knew what he was up to, his bank account was nearly $2500 in the hole - and nearly $1800 of it was in overdraft fees! I managed to get them to waive most of the overdraft fees and we did manage to catch up, but it took us months and his credit is irrevocably affected. Not too long ago, there was a bill or set of regulations floated that would have required banks and lending agencies to state all their fees in simple, layman's terms and display them prominently on their web sites, in billing and statements and in brochures. Three guesses what happened to that bill when it was opened for public comment. In a nutshell, the banking industry and related industries freaked out about "additional regulations" and what a heavy weight it would be on them to print up all these notices, and how much business they'd lose by being more transparent. I lost track of what happened to it, but I'm pretty sure it was defeated. Interestingly, just last week there was an article in the NY Times Sunday magazine about a bank that has bought one of those neighborhood check cashing and payday loan companies - and decided to keep the founder on as CEO because he understands the market for the product. The reporter visited one of his check cashing places and found that signs in the lobby clearly displayed the services offered and exactly how much those services would cost the customer. He spoke with people in line and asked them if they understood that they were paying outrageous interest rates to take out loans this way, and that they could cash checks for free if they had a bank account. The response he got was really interesting - and telling. Every single one of them knew that they were paying high interest rates - but they said that at least they knew -exactly- what it would cost them, unlike a bank where they could never get a straight answer about how much it would cost to get a loan (of course, that also assumes that someone could go to a bank and get a loan of $200 for a month - which you can't). The UK has required banks and credit card companies to simplify their language and to post their fees and rates prominently for a few years now. It only makes simple sense - but then again, we all know how rare it is that banks use simple sense. The more complicated they make things, the easier it is for them to fleece the rest of us.
1 person likes this
@coffeebreak (17797)
• United States
17 Nov 08
I know ... it can bite you fast and hard! YOu really have to be careful and make sure you literally don't spend more than the balance that is in there. Your friends situation of course we not forseeable, but still - they don't care. They could have worked with you on it. And I have seeen the neighborhood check cashing stores - would never use one myself simply cause if I can't afford it now, how do I expect tp afford it later? And they do have posters telling what they "offer". But I mean banks - actual banks - they don't display posters about fees they charge - like as you just mentioned - have you been in that bank and seen a poster about those accumulative fees? YOu get a little notice in the mail that is in very small print in half a lanugage that only a business graduate or the CEO that made them up, can understand.
• United States
17 Nov 08
Nope, you're right, you don't. That was my point. Not only do they not tell you what it will cost and how, they actively lobby against any regulations that would require them to explain their fees in simple language that anyone can understand. As far as using check cashing places, I've used them to cash my paychecks and tax return checks for years for one main reason: Banks will only cash a check for you if you have enough money in your account to cover the check. Since we live paycheck to paycheck, that meant I had to deposit my paycheck and let it sit in the bank for 3-5 days before I could use the money to pay bills or rent or buy food. That's more and more true among working class families. We just can't afford banks and paying $3 to cash a $300 paycheck is worth it. We didn't abandon the banks - they abandoned us by eliminating services that we need and deciding that our money wasn't worth it to them.
@bfarrier1 (2082)
• United States
16 Nov 08
I guess I am lucky my bank dont charge any fees for checking,unless they start now that every thing is so messed up.You have a great night.
1 person likes this
@coffeebreak (17797)
• United States
16 Nov 08
Mine has minimal charges. For over draft and bounced checks, there is a fee, but I can understand that - it isn't their fault a customer bounced a check but at the same time, it wasn't customers fault the bank issued bad mortgage loans! But my bank has no monthly fee and 2 "Free" bounced check fees per year and something for overdraft..don't remember what it is as I refuse to ever do an over draft - if I don't have the money in the account, even if I do have checks in my check book, I won't do the transaction!
@goldeneagle (6743)
• United States
15 Nov 08
That is the way it always works...the rich play their games, and the poor foot the expenses for it...
1 person likes this
@coffeebreak (17797)
• United States
16 Nov 08
Yep - thats the way it goes - the little guy always has to pay cause they are the ones that are dependent on the big guys.
1 person likes this